No, I won't. I'm going to "prove" it, it will be fun. You said "you're raising a vacuous distinction." This is true, but only when you look at my question from a Ti-perspective on things. But there are also other perspectives to things, e.g. Fe, Fi, Ne, Ni, Te, Si and Se perspectives. You take my question "Would you want to be another type?", process it only by means of a Ti filter and apparently reach the conclusion that it is an invalid question. Now that's pretty autistic in my dictionary.

But I'm willing to soften my statement: lets just say you're narrow-minded.
people like you always wishfully think their way into expecting their opposition to be simple-minded when the reality is they see a plethora of nuances as to how you are wrong. unlearn that habit and stop echoing this disgrace of an exchange with anti-realist socionics-inspired tripe.