Most of us are really skinny.
Look for casual and comfortable dress, usually we like our hair up in public or completely down; we look and walk kind of stoopy like this:
Have an enigmatic look like this:
Most of us are really skinny.
Look for casual and comfortable dress, usually we like our hair up in public or completely down; we look and walk kind of stoopy like this:
Have an enigmatic look like this:
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Nope.
IEE 649 sx/sp cp
Have a serious face like this:
show a beautiful smile:
Looks like me in my avatar.
dress to impress and give a really nice smile:
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Maritsa, unless you can find evidence to support your claims, I'm going to write them off as fallacies. So far all I see is subjective generalizations being paraded as fact ("I'm EII, and this is how I look, thus EII's look like this, I know this because I'm EII"); circular thinking accomplishes nothing
EII INFj
Forum status: retired
And this is how male LSEs look like:
Note they look similar to me, that is the photo of me I posted in unofficial member's pics thread.
EIIs are creepy as hell. They devour souls.
So so wrong. I hope the newbs dont fall for this.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
A few other typical EII looks:
Sultry:
Intellectual:
Empathetic:
Concerned about your health:
LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”
Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”
LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”
This is Balzac. Balzac is a chubby little man even though he is typed ILI by many people, he isn't even sensing nor does he value Si.
He drank buckets of coffee, though.
Body types might influence your impression of ones type, but I guess this shouldn't be overestimated or used as an argument. (Like: "You're fat. IEIs are never fat! You're not an IEI!!!")
Last edited by Pa3s; 01-23-2012 at 07:15 PM. Reason: punctuation
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
Lol, you had me confused in the first two.
I was like
.. Sultry? How is that sultry, it's more like sulky...who would think that was sexy??
... Intellectual? Is he making fun of F types now?
But I finally got it with the empathetic one! Lol
Though, the last one could very well apply to being concerned about his partners health.
"If you,ve got no stds, we could have some fun..."
Or ..."blue balls is bad for your health, lemme take care of that for you,"
Etc.
IEE 649 sx/sp cp
Sulking:
This is the fatness scale according to my private data:
ISTp - 0.61
ESFj - 0.61
ESTj - 0.60
ISFp - 0.59
ESFp - 0.58
ESTp - 0.54
ENTp - 0.49
ENFj - 0.48
ENTj - 0.46
ISTj - 0.44
ENFp - 0.44
INFj - 0.43
INTp - 0.42
INFp - 0.41
ISFj - 0.36
INTj - 0.34
As you can see, according to my private data, it is the Si types who are typically the fattest.
This is how feels right now!This message is hidden because Maritsa33 is on your ignore list.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
Me neither, WA. I think betas and alphas are a little more likely to be fat valuing +Si.. but enviromental factors/ emotional coping style, have much more influence over weight than sociotype does.
LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”
Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”
LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”
^ there's nothing like a big, fat chunk of sarcasm in the morning.
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
Johari/Nohari
"Tell someone you love them today, because life is short; shout it at them in German, because life is also terrifying."
Fruit, the fluffy kitty.
Si isn't just about instantaneous hedonistic fulfillment, it's also about avoiding discomfort. Some Si valuers will process this by equating an unhealthy lifestyle to negative sensations, "if I don't take care of myself, I'm going to feel uncomfortable and look horrible"
To be quite honest, I think you can use any IE to make excuses for being overweight or as a motivating tool to be healthy/look better
*facepalm*
EII INFj
Forum status: retired
LOL @ thread.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
Looks like an attempt at a serious thread failed just a little bit.
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor