Results 1 to 40 of 45

Thread: Could the Function Ordering be Different from Model A?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Professional Turtle Taknamay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    United States
    TIM
    EII-Ne
    Posts
    857
    Mentioned
    20 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default









    ..."symmetry"? Is there something I am not getting here? >_>
    What is a utopia? A dream unrealized, but not unrealizable. -- Joseph Dejacque
    EII (INFj) - 9w1 - INFP - Scorpio - Hufflepuff
    Johari - Fediverse

  2. #2
    jason_m's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,309
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Taknamay View Post








    ..."symmetry"? Is there something I am not getting here? >_>
    See how the left column is (supposed to contain) all judging functions and the right column all perceiving functions... That is what I mean by "symmetry"...

  3. #3
    Coldest of the Socion EyeSeeCold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Holy Temple of St. Augusta
    Posts
    3,682
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Does it matter?

    Superficial and cosmetic ordering is different from the actual dispositions caused by psychological orientation. I can't tell if you're referring to the former, latter or both.
    (i)NTFS

    An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
    and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI

    31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
    My work on Inert/Contact subtypes

    Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
    Socionics Tests Database
    Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites


    Fidei Defensor

  4. #4
    jason_m's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,309
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EyeSeeCold View Post
    Does it matter?

    Superficial and cosmetic ordering is different from the actual dispositions caused by psychological orientation. I can't tell if you're referring to the former, latter or both.
    How do you distinguish something "cosmetically superficial" from something "mathematically elegant"?
    Last edited by jason_m; 01-21-2012 at 02:50 AM.

  5. #5
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,937
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    no.

  6. #6
    jason_m's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,309
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by labocat View Post
    no.
    What am I to make of an answer like that?

  7. #7
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,937
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    it's a simple and straightforward empirical fact that the function we currently know as the 4th is the vulnerable one, whereas the 3rd is not.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •