edited for gayness
edited for gayness
Last edited by kopyk; 10-29-2012 at 06:02 PM.
I think u look Se-POLR. That's why i voted for both EII and LII. cant make more of a distinction than that.
EDIT: on second look, i lean LII > EII. It's up to you to decide which one fits better though (if any).
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Obvious LII is obvious.
okay then... i will have to learn to be more decisive next time!
i was on the right track though!
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Cannot see IJ-ness in any shape or form. ILE.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
I have thought you were LII since day 1 and nothing has changed my mind about that.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
You guys should at least charge for these services. I mean, you are all appearantly right(by the row of dominoes principle), so why waste your talent coming of as an internet in crowd of typers instead of actually making some money? If the conviction you all give off really is worth anything, it should work.
Join my Enneagram Discord: https://discord.gg/ND4jCAcs
Undoubtedly LII.
edit;
EII could work as well. I would have to read more about you to be sure.
Your pictures are far too close to type; you need to take a few from further away and from the side so we can see your profile. Thanks.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
you VI introverted & sickly
You have a Se-PoLR, but you don't simplify and systematize like LIIs do, instead you create elaborate chains of reasoning which fits well with Causal-Determinist style of thinking that only 2 intuitive types possess: EII and ILE. Choosing between these two types, rational > irrational and introvert > extravert, thus EII is the best fit.
By enneagram you are 6w5, double-head triad, which imparts a more dry-ish, intellectual slant, a head-first orientation, and this is likely why many people will consider a logical type for you.
p . . . a . . . n . . . d . . . o . . . r . . . a
trad metalz | (more coming)
As for VI goes, the biggest thing I got there is Se devaluing and Intuitive. Definite on those ones. You're an Ne subtype of some type. You look looser and less settled than IJ types; EP and IJ are difficult to pin on you, but EP works far better. Your stance and your eyes remind me of HaveLucidDreamz somewhat, pretty sure he's ENxp something...
Ne-ILE it is then
Last edited by woofwoofl; 01-04-2012 at 10:56 AM. Reason: forgot to WRITE MY TYPING DOWN of all things
p . . . a . . . n . . . d . . . o . . . r . . . a
trad metalz | (more coming)
yeah i noticed NTs don't usually ask a bunch of questions (about the theory at least), i think they generally like to figure things out for themselves. NFs are more likely to ask a ton of questions.
i think Athens looks ethical too, so i wouldn't guess LII. maybe EII, IEE, IEI.
Bwahaha, there are pics.
I think your ILE from how you come across in chatbox and from your photos.
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
you VI so Ji-IJ it's ridiculous, INFj > INTj.
this photo of you reminded me of Cirnech a whole lot, there is a lot of semblance, he got typed INFj by many forum members afaik
Tests are shit.
Tests are best when you've developed enough knowledge of socionics to get whichever result you want.
VI-wise I find you ESI, owever I think you are SLE, based on your interaction in this thread. Hmm now the hard part, to develop (a bit): you are concise and to the point and don't let people derail, you seem single-focused and also you easily publicly express your likes/dislikes (who annoys you) consistently with my observations on SLEs. Do you usually take on people's appearance, criticizing their style, in a joking manner, though it can be perceived as inappropriate or offensive? This is a peculiar detail I found common among the SLEs you remind me of.
Polikujm come up with a posts equating knowledge with Ti once and I see you most knowledgeable in one of the threads.
You look like INTp and very much like MegaDoomer member P3S ...something. You talk a lot of the things from the past as well and how you are in a more of a process fashion.
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 01-13-2012 at 05:43 AM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Robyn, comparing an all around respected member like Slacker to a member like Maritsa is insulting.
As she said, she has typed him LII since he came to the forum. The pictures have not changed her mind (although I believe she has stated on the chatbox that she does not put much weight in VI). That doesn't mean she is ignoring new information and will not reconsider, it means all information that is given still aligns with LII.
Athens decided to be a nitpicky asshole, saying the thread is only for VI. What's the point in that? Is VI the only valid method of typing a person? No, it isn't.
If the thread is ONLY VI, then why did he answer Bolt's questions that weren't VI related at all? Why did he make that post about his test results and interrelations? Those things don't relate to it. He also did not say the same thing to the other members when they gave input that was not VI related. This leads me to believe he actually only said this because has a bias against Slacker and her opinion.
What Maritsa said is just further proof that she's an idiot who should probably be on everyone's ignore list. Saying that means she is ignoring new information that may be beneficial for the sake of never wanting to admit being wrong. Not at all what Slacker was doing, which anyone with half a brain should be able to see.
Jenna, you just landed on "ignore list" island...
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
As far as Athens type, I voted LII, but I'm now thinking EII is more likely. He seems to put a lot of emphasis on Te, by really focusing on getting input from others on tangible evidence (his obsession with VI results). Te seeking? I think perhaps he feels that it's the most factual or something? Through text you can interpret many things but a face is a face, it doesn't change. He also lumps things together, like saying ____ mental disorder = xx type. He doesn't seem interested in the theoretical aspects of socionics, like most of the not-so-social NT types here. The more social ones don't seem to care much but he is pretty obvious one of the not so social people here...I'm not sure though, i will stay inconclusive about this for right now
- Truth-seeking dialogue requires the clear communication of grounded facts to reach objectively valid conclusions. However, the observant participant appreciates the salutary nature of errancy and fallaciousness; their antithetical relation with the Real discloses a vivid borderline to the outré zones of rational inquiry. That is to say, exposure to various species of bullshit engenders their easy recognition, and furthermore this teaches an aversion to bullshit in kind. And so by this means one is rendered less likely to step in said bullshit, or pick it up in the mistaken belief that it is something other than it is.
- If a tree falls in the woods and no one is there to laugh then is it still funny? Oh hellllllz naw.
Thusly, ergo, concordantly, and vis-a-vis:
To honor her inadvertent contributions to the fields of science, art, and their go-between, philosophy, I hereby proclaim Maritsa the thinking person's least rightly ignorable member of 16chan.
Nah, I wouldn't say it's the most accurate, though ideally it would be. Most have their own method of using it, it's not something that is concrete. If there were more definitive ways to type people via VI, then that would be what everyone used. It's too easy to misinterpret and too easy to justify those misinterpretations. Someone may say that one trait is common in one type, or something along those lines, but the problem is when they don't quite grasp the type and how that type actually is. I'm going to get way off topic if I continue explaining this and I'll forget how any of what I'm saying actually relates to the point I am trying to make so I'm going to stop now lol