edited for gayness
What do I VI as?
edited for gayness
Last edited by kopyk; 10-29-2012 at 06:02 PM.
I think u look Se-POLR. That's why i voted for both EII and LII. cant make more of a distinction than that.
EDIT: on second look, i lean LII > EII. It's up to you to decide which one fits better though (if any).
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Obvious LII is obvious.
okay then... i will have to learn to be more decisive next time!
i was on the right track though!
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Cannot see IJ-ness in any shape or form. ILE.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Your pictures are far too close to type; you need to take a few from further away and from the side so we can see your profile. Thanks.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
you VI introverted & sickly
You have a Se-PoLR, but you don't simplify and systematize like LIIs do, instead you create elaborate chains of reasoning which fits well with Causal-Determinist style of thinking that only 2 intuitive types possess: EII and ILE. Choosing between these two types, rational > irrational and introvert > extravert, thus EII is the best fit.
By enneagram you are 6w5, double-head triad, which imparts a more dry-ish, intellectual slant, a head-first orientation, and this is likely why many people will consider a logical type for you.
You look like INTp and very much like MegaDoomer member P3S ...something. You talk a lot of the things from the past as well and how you are in a more of a process fashion.
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 01-13-2012 at 05:43 AM.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
He doesn't look like me.Originally Posted by Maritsa33
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
Jenna, you just landed on "ignore list" island...
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Can you post a picture taken from directly side shot, shoulder's up? and face forward as someone takes this picture of you, please.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
You're a rational type; LII or LIE;
You seem to be constantly engaged with the objects you're filming with and you're not within yourself, which tells me your unsteadiness must be due to Se, perceiving sensations around you and moving around constantly. EII are a lot more steady, calm, and in tuned with their internal self, but also very choppy in their style. You seem to be fluid.
I would go with LIE.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I could take that as either creative Ne or demonstrative Ne.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
athww, you rickrolling son of a bitch!
Moonlight will fall
Winter will end
Harvest will come
Your heart will mend
Posting Permissions
