IEI vs SEI: The Mediator Debacle

[Aquagraph]

Genetically, IEI have upturned yes at the outside lids and SEI have downturned...you're morphologically SEI and you're Te PoLR is very apparent with this thread (they keep doubting their type). Join Allie, you guys can hang out.

Not again with the maritsagenetics... Thought you stop showing off your expertise about genetics since you edited out the part of the post from where I got my current signature.

[Leader]

It isn't genetics, but Maritsa is on the right track. Shes basically just talking about the subtle facial expresses common in each type. Shes basically just using VI Identification. Due to the individual's DNA ----> Information Metabolism ----> Appearance and Behavior common among that type. Its not genetic, since genetics pertains to traits received from heredity.

Maritsa does have some sound logic, I like her....but her typings seem way off. I think her "problem" is that she types people based on how they make -her- feel subjectively (like for example how she glorifies/exaggerates LSE's for being fun, emotionally empathetic, w/e), rather than what is actually going on in reality. Which messes with her typings.

And many of you need to hop of the "letsmakefunofmaritsa" bandwagon. Its not that serious.

[Aquagraph]

And many of you need to hop of the "letsmakefunofmaritsa" bandwagon. Its not that serious.

That's right. It's not serious. It's fun.

It's propably very true that people form their faces the way the make facial expressions. There has been studies showing that even some sort criminality can be seen from face.

Yet, as a son of two biologists I have a strong want to call out this shit. And as an asshole, I have a strong need to make fun of stupid people I don't like.

[Leader]

That's right. It's not serious. It's fun.

It's propably very true that people form their faces the way the make facial expressions. There has been studies showing that even some sort criminality can be seen from face.

Yet, as a son of two biologists I have a strong want to call out this shit. And as an asshole, I have a strong need to make fun of stupid people I don't like.

You're a very confused individual.

[Aquagraph]

You're a very confused individual.

Or maybe you're just confused about my individuality.

[Lotus]

i've known kam for a while, we're even texting buddies. however, i'm certain he's not IEI. i just don't see duality with an SLE, he needs a sexy ENTp nerd girl in his life. <2

[Hot Scalding Gayser]

You seem kinda cutting compared to a lot of the isfps I know, not as soft & gentle but it's also like you are 'acting' for the camera a bit, I can still see the isfp softness kinda.

SEI over IEI, definitely, at any rate.

I can act like you on cam too though sometimes.

[Absurd]

There has been studies showing that even some sort criminality can be seen from face.

I'm afraid 18th century physiognomy was abandoned and discredited in 20th century. Among famous ones were eugenicists, anthropologists and so on.

It isn't genetics, but Maritsa is on the right track. Shes basically just talking about the subtle facial expresses common in each type. Shes basically just using VI Identification. Due to the individual's DNA ----> Information Metabolism ----> Appearance and Behavior common among that type. Its not genetic, since genetics pertains to traits received from heredity.

That's incorrect. One of many physiognomy pioneers believed it is hereditary. I mean you should know that already seeing you fancy the great supporter of negative eugenics, namely ******.

Next!

[Suz]

I'm afraid 18th century physiognomy was abandoned and discredited in 20th century. Among famous ones were eugenicists, anthropologists and so on.

That's incorrect. One of many physiognomy pioneers believed it is hereditary. I mean you should know that already seeing you fancy the great supporter of negative eugenics, namely ******.

Next!

Thank you for saying what was in MY head!

[Jinxi]

No Fe.

[Mediator Kam]

@wa, lol it seems to me i've given my suggestion and you've given yours, in fact you've stated same thing in 3-4 different ways saying dude is not intp - what's the need for such emphasis, may i ask? nothing else to add on my end, of course i could do what you do and just reiterate til oblivion. seriously wa, lol.

/ps: look at your own post here:"ILI is not consistent with pleasantly exuberant Fe in the joy + kam vid.

And no, not even consistent with this vid... I totally disagree with an ILI typing--that's coming from left field imo. Just being serious and talking serious for a few minutes =/= Fe-POLR. " - > gee, how many different ways do you need to say it....?

???? a quien le importa?

[Leader]

I'm afraid 18th century physiognomy was abandoned and discredited in 20th century. Among famous ones were eugenicists, anthropologists and so on.



That's incorrect. One of many physiognomy pioneers believed it is hereditary. I mean you should know that already seeing you fancy the great supporter of negative eugenics, namely ******.

Next!

You are a psychopath. You don't know what you're talking about.

[Absurd]

You are a psychopath. You don't know what you're talking about.

Keep repeating it, betoid. You have a lot stupid in your blood system.

[Leader]

Keep repeating it, betoid. You have a lot stupid in your blood system.

Betoid? I have a lot stupid?

J00 no speakeh de inglis?

[Aquagraph]

I'm afraid 18th century physiognomy was abandoned and discredited in 20th century. Among famous ones were eugenicists, anthropologists and so on.

That's incorrect. One of many physiognomy pioneers believed it is hereditary. I mean you should know that already seeing you fancy the great supporter of negative eugenics, namely ******.

Next!

Don't give me a ****** card, I want raw study material. I can give you a study for my basis. And look! It's from this century!

[Absurd]

Don't give me a ****** card, I want raw study material.

Didn't give you one.

I can give you a study for my basis. And look! It's from this century!

Great. I don't look like a criminal.