I still say Ti-EXTp 3w4 sx/so
ILE (ENTp)
SEI (ISFp)
ESE (ESFj)
LII (INTj)
SLE (ESTp)
IEI (INFp)
EIE (ENFj)
LSI (ISTj)
SEE (ESFp)
ILI (INTp)
LIE (ENTj)
ESI (ISFj)
IEE (ENFp)
SLI (ISTp)
LSE (ESTj)
EII (INFj)
Alpha
Beta
Gamma
Delta
I still say Ti-EXTp 3w4 sx/so
after I saw a vid of him around here, I was sure he´s Ti creative (with Se much more likely) and nothing is going to change my mind.
E 3w2 imo.
RIP Transkar. 10/08/2014. His death was caused by his big mouth.
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
By learning more information about this delightful person, I decided he's E3w2 sx . And probably Se base.
I can't tell the difference between 3w2 sx and 3w4 sx. Someone clue me in? I imagine 3w2s are more comfortable grabbing the spotlight in a more overt "look at me I can do the thing" way.
Transkar does look similar to Ezra.
I had him as ILE-Ti sx/so 7w8.
And Ezra as SLE-Ti sx/so 7w8.
Figured they must have had similar instinct stackings, but there was something off about a SLE typing for Transkar/Ron Mexico. A kind of nebulousness, an imaginative quality and an overly trusting nature as per his story of getting scammed and left with the party bill. Both Ezra and Trans also wouldn't know how to moderate and manage their "image" if their lives depended on it, so I'm not really seeing any of the image triad types, rather misdirected attempts to one-up and dominate others of the 8 wing. And of course the adventurer and experience seeker drive of the e7.
I wish I wasn't so goddamn compatible with this douchebag but I am, our chemistry online is pretty funny.
I'M SORRY STRAIGHT GIRLS FOR ALL THE TIMES I MADE FUN OF YOU FOR THIS BULLSHIT. I AM. PLEASE FORGIVE ME. PLEASE FORGIVE ANOTHER STRAIGHT GIRL. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE. I WON'T EVER MORALLY JUDGE A STRAIGHT GIRL AGAIN. I HAVE NO RIGHT.
Hmmm, sx/so 8w7 SLE-SE? Idk but I guess you chat with him more huh, @Elina? He seems more 7-ish to me.
He does fit those roles. Dude was trying to whip people into physical shape but is pretty bony so I had to let him know, lmao. I said I hesitated with SEE because he doesn't strike me as someone with a good grasp on the impersonal/inanimate aspects of life. Maybe if he's SLE,subtype could make him seem more ethical, bolstering his
or something. I may meet him and SEE for myself.
en inglés por favor? How does the bolded part manifest in real life scenarios?Originally Posted by Ollyx2OxenFree
He does fit those roles. Dude was trying to whip people into physical shape but is pretty bony so I had to let him know, lmao. I said I hesitated with SEE because he doesn't strike me as someone with a good grasp on the impersonal/inanimate aspects of life. Maybe if he's SLE,
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Oh, I meant that I didn't get strong vibes from him as someone being really logically attuned, more attuned to rules, laws, impersonal aspects of the world, you know? Rather than animate aspects such as emotions and sentiments.en inglés por favor? How does the bolded part manifest in real life scenarios?
Hmm, I think he is attuned to more than people realize.
Edit: reread as instructed. Ok I see what you are saying now.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
SLE, same type as DJA and point, reasons given in chatbox:
InvisibleJim Today 04:43 PM
However radio has a point there are striking similarties between the thought process of transkar and point.
InvisibleJim Today 04:43 PM
They are both internally conflicted between their need to please their ego and their need to play the popularity card.
InvisibleJim Today 04:43 PM
Similar to DJA another well known SLE
InvisibleJim Today 04:43 PM
I think it rather more clearly questions points type, than the others?
InvisibleJim Today 04:46 PM
They all through their toys out of the pram when they don't get what they want, whether Transkar, DJA or point. Very similar traits are apparent. Whether its Ep or something similar.
InvisibleJim Today 04:46 PM
They invent rational explanations for their irrational behaviour.
The ban is seemingly likely to be a manifestation of points need to be the dominant Beta and to avoid competition.
Point is now SLE...
My typing of Transkar is based primarily on my personal chats with him and some of my observations. I am trying to find you duals, Jim, duals! I want him to go to Mexico and have drinks with you on the terraza. Is that too much to ask??? No wonder Merc nominated me under-appreciated!!!
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I were talking about his type earlier in the shoutbox before the whole drama thing.
I told truck I thought Transkar was SEE.
Transkar supporters
Hitta - IEI
Truck - IEI
Invisible Jim - ILI
zap - probably IEI
Coincidence I think not.
(i may have forgotten some ppl)
I don't know if it's type related.
I find this permaban exaggerated overall.
Hitta - LII
zap - LII
Coincidence you type them beta? I think maybe not, lol.
Honestly, you could be the spitting internet-image of William aka snaps, aka all sorts of names he's used.
Edited to add: from what I've seen, admittedly little of here and there, you seem to want people to set aside their own emotions/values to foster a positive happy-happy-joy-joy atmosphere for everyone. Some comments I've read of yours seemed Fi Ignoring.
IEE 649 sx/sp cp
SEE 3w2 so/sx looks right for his socionics/enneagram type....(like bill clinton & jordan belfort in terms of look...my immediate gut response)
even more threeish is that all his projections revolve around identity issues:
that youtube video he made was about how to present/perform in front of a group.[Today 03:23 PM]
Transkar
: I think everybody here is in an identity crisis
[Today 03:23 PM]
Transkar
: It's time for me to help you all
[Today 03:23 PM]
Transkar
: Pull you out of this identity Crisis.
[Today 03:23 PM]
William
: @transkar - projection much?
[Today 03:23 PM]
Transkar
: So let's start with step one of getting out of the identity Crisis
This screenshot was captured before Transkar/Ron Mexico erased it....
his approach to hitting on her (intentional or not) has a more feelerish, emotionally manipulative quality...SEE > SLE
note the line where he says "which isn't actually ridiculous but is rather attractive on every possible level imaginable"...
he's got one eye sizing up how his behavior looks in front of the 'mirror,' even as he does it...very typical of SEE 3w2.
an all right guy, but neither an 8 nor SLE.
People who show some "real" personality end up getting banned from this place.
at least you can take consolation in the fact that pretty much everybody agreed on your instinctual stack
There's something about the combination of him being 8w7, sx/so, SLE-Se and having his strongest fixations with all the assertive types that I'm not sure about but I can easier see why people think type 3. We aren't trying to duel with you about your macho dual.
Not sure about him though despite the brief meeting.
Don't shoot the messenger! I just went with the semi-official descriptions.
I just see his Fe as more demonstrative and playful/trickster energy than a HA and he asked for people to justify their perceptions so I used those two sites to do it. It's not like I wrote them myself.I could have went into what I SEE in him personally on here but I already have told him one on one. At that point he asked me not to type him until I saw him for myself so this thread was a bit of a surprise to begin with and I am not sure how serious he was when he created it.
I don't want to battle-type anyone. I was just giving justification like he asked for. I did get more insight into him and how he used his demonstrative Fe after everything that went down on the site.
A person uses this element mainly as a kind of game, or to ridicule those who he thinks take it too seriously. They often intentionally go against its conventional usage simply to prove a point in favor of their creative function. However, this function is used quite often in private, to produce information of its element to support their creative function when focusing on making contact with the external world.A person will often have just as sophisticated an understanding of this function as his or her leading function. Unlike the ignoring function it plays a major part in a person's worldview, since as the vulnerable function of one's dual it requires especially delicate attention. Thus, when a person is given information regarding the element in the demonstrative function by someone else, they will tend to take it as obvious information that is irrelevant to completely focus on. One will often use the demonstrative function to defend and further support their beliefs made in the vulnerable function.The demonstrative function is easiest function to use (after the base function) yet often occurs sporadically. When one experiences a problem regarding this function, one must correct it as it does play a vital part in a person's worldview.- See more at: http://www.sociotype.com/socionics/f....0Kr807ko.dpuf
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
It's peacocking like this that made me think SEE. I find SLE a bit more subtle and less dramatic while peacocking it . They show it by their presence more than their words.Don't shoot the messenger! I just went with the semi-official descriptions.
I just see his Fe as more demonstrative and playful/trickster energy than a HA and he asked for people to justify their perceptions so I used those two sites to do it. It's not like I wrote them myself.
I don't want to battle-type anyone. I was just giving justification like he asked for. I did get more insight into him and how he used his demonstrative Fe after everything that went down on the site.
Edit: Apparently thread was deleted while I was posting.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Lol you're so sensitiveI was actually feeling playful when I responded but I did want to link some things up and kind of explain that I was using the other sites for the justification part without having to reinvent the wheel. I do not agree with a lot of the descriptions but I can see what the are trying to get at. I rewrite things in my head all the time so they make sense to me but trying to explain seems futile without explaining details of how I think. Oy!!!
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
While reading your post ENxp stood out to me; ILE is quite likely. The more you learn about personality theory and study/interact with people the better you will get at typing people. Welcome to the forum!
P.S. - What kind of dancing are you into?
I usually make up my own stuff. Not a big fan of group dancing. I try to be as ridiculous as I can while looking good.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
