Results 1 to 40 of 57

Thread: Massive Type-Me Thread

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    FoxOnStilts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    TN
    TIM
    Fi-SLE 3w9 so/sp
    Posts
    790
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Massive Type-Me Thread

    Okay this is a lot, but if anything isn't covered that you want to know, feel free to ask. I hear I'm pretty easy to type, but some people seem to think IEE over ILE so I threw this together in hopes of getting 'whys' and 'hows' from sources other than just my video.

    Questions
    Pick 5 words or short phrases (or as many as you want, but no less than 5) to describe yourself, and explain.
    -I am quick. I am quick-witted and sarcastic, but also a quick learner. I don’t always remember things spatially unless I read them (I have an atrocious memory for my surroundings), but once I decide to learn it, I pick up on it very quickly and can retrieve it years later if need be. Unfortunately, I also tend to speed through things. I speed through work cutting corners if it doesn’t matter to me, and I quickly lose interest in something once I feel that I know enough of it or just get bored with where I am in it. I also enjoy and am good at problem-solving and puzzles. Usually if I don’t do well in them, it’s because I skipped over something obvious instead of just not being capable of that sort of thinking.

    -Engaging. If I’m in a new group of people, I am usually cracking jokes (generally at my own expense, but I won’t say everyone gets away unscathed ). I don’t mind taking charge and motivating people. I’m an optimist, and I think that people generally get more work done when we have fun working together. I’m definitely a class clown, which probably helps to encourage the “fun” atmosphere. It also leads people to underestimate me, though. I usually have a few random facts or props stored in a pocket for when I go out.

    -Independent. I have my own life and interests. I don’t need anyone else to do something. I am female, yet I manage to go to the bathroom without a pack. I don’t rely on other people or tell them my problems, and prefer to figure it out by myself. I got a great opportunity to study out-of-country and now I’m 4,000mi away from anyone I’m close to. I go to the movies by myself, I think I’m awesome, and, though I like to talk to people, don’t always need to be in constant contact with them. In fact, I’d probably prefer NOT to have to talk to people all the time. Extroverted or not, I definitely need my space to think.

    -Straightforward. I am what I am and that is that. I’m very WYSIWYG. I don’t have any deep-dark secrets or hidden motivations, and I’m willing to talk to almost everyone about everything. I don’t bring it up, but if asked, I will generally answer and talk to them about my past, no matter how sordid. Even if I did some shameful things in the past, they’ve made me who I am. I also can be very blunt and straight to the point. I don’t like mincing words to save people’s feelings (that and I’m a terrible judge at telling when a “line” has been crossed in regards to emotions, especially when joking) when I can just be direct and get it done faster. Which you probably can’t tell judging from how wordy I’m being in this questionnaire. And my video.

    -Knowledgeable-
    I know a lot of things. Once I learn something, I know it for a very long while. I’m also good at taking what I know and extrapolating on it. If someone asks something, I might not know the exact answer, but I can take what I DO know and somehow piece together bits and pieces to make a reasonable guess that more often than not turns out to be correct.

    Now pick the direct opposite of those and explain how you could be the opposite, and what could be good about it.

    -The opposite of quick is slow. I can be slow when I don’t want to do something. I hate feeling boxed in or like I’m being constrained by obligation in any way, spoken or unspoken. I can be slow at making decisions, because I generally don’t care what we do as long as it’s fun/exciting/novel.

    -The opposite of engaging is disconnected. Which I can also be a lot. I can be incredibly superficially charming, but sometimes I just float off into my own little world for a little while or say something that seems utterly non-sequitur to those around me. Sometimes, I also get tired of talking and need to retreat a bit. And a lot of time I come off as scatterbrained, too, and that could be related to ‘disconnected’. Also, if I’m in a one-on-one situation, I’m totally different. I can entertain a group, but if it’s just me and someone else, I’m a completely different person. Very awkward, always saying the wrong things, nervous, etc. I need multiple points of data to play off of and engage the crowd, I guess.

    -The opposite is dependent. I guess I’m financially dependent? I owe the government my life in loans. Hmm. And I always need new things to learn/think about, so I’m dependent on outside sources for that (yay internet?) I can spend hours laying around thinking about something new and how it all pieces together, but once I feel that I know it thoroughly, I need something else.

    -The opposite of straightforward is roundabout. If I am lying about something (which happens on occasion.,) I’m good at picking words in such a way that I don’t outright lie. Not because I have any qualms about it, but I know it’s easier to stick as close to the truth as possible. And if it comes up, I can just tell I never lied, which is true, so it’s a way of covering my bases. Also, if someone asks me something that I’m not comfortable about doing/answering, I can be very roundabout in how I answer. I can talk circles around something to the point that the inquirer doesn’t even realize I didn’t answer.

    -The opposite of knowledgeable is ignorant. Ignorance is just not knowing something, and there is a lot out there that I don’t know. I’m working on changing that, but more and more keeps developing. Plus, some things I’m just not very interested in and don’t explore, so I remain ignorant of those. I have little-to-no interest in the workings of electronics, for instance, but how we see and categorize color in languages across cultures....mmmpfff. Sorry, I got a little excited for a minute.
    I’m also pretty ignorant at how people feel a lot of the time. I can’t tell the emotional states of people unless...well, generally unless they tell me. If someones crying, I can probably guess that they’re upset, but anything other than that I have no idea. I’d much rather just have someone tell me their state so I can adjust accordingly.

    3) What are your interests? Why?
    This week? It switches up a lot. I guess an over-arching interest is why people behave the way they behave, which encompasses everything from cultural motivations to behavioral genetics. I also like looking at bones and archaeology (or at least one would hope I’m interested in it, since that’s what I’m studying.) The “why” is probably just because we are unique to this planet and it’s fascinating that we’re capable of such amazing things, but also terrible, nonsensical things at the same time. And I’m supposedly a part of this group.

    What do you want out of life?
    Variety. I’d like to be able to do a lot of different things, even if I don’t make an impact on the world with any of them. I don’t really think anyone really changes things, so as long as I’m happy and enjoying myself, that’s a life best fulfilled.

    What can you not do, because it might jeopardize your survival?

    See, here’s that ridiculous question. I also can’t do a menial office job. :\ I’ve tried, and that would jeopardize my survival in the most literal sense. And I can’t be chained down to anything/anyone. I just wanna be free, baby! I also have trouble opening up to people emotionally. Everything with me probably comes off as shallow on the surface because it takes a long time and I have to be approached in just the right way for anyone to know how I really feel about something. It’s something I’m trying to get over, but I really think it just leads me to talk about emotions in a sciencey way instead of an emotional one and just sounds really fake.

    What do you like in other people? Why?
    Excitement/passion about something. It doesn’t matter what, but I really enjoy listening to people teach me about something they love. Oh, and they have to be able to deal with political incorrectness and able to handle being the butt of a joke. I show affection by making fun of people.

    What do you dislike in other people? Why?
    I dislike people who are satisfied with the mediocre and have no ambition in life. It’s fine if you’re just doing something so that you can get a job because that counts as a goal. But I hate people who are content with not going anywhere.

    What would your ideal partner be like?
    Someone who can give me feedback on ideas. Only about 1-in-6 of my ideas are actually good and plausible, but I can’t tell which one is the good one when I get on a roll. Someone grounding. They have to be able to listen to me rant and go off on a monologue of “what if” and “what could be” but then just make me stop when I get too wound up. Someone to remind me that I need to shower or sleep when I’ve been up for days because I really, really want to draw pictures for every bone and landmark in the human body, but also just brings me some pizza when I need a break from this. Someone who encourages me to be open emotionally, specifically by being patient. It takes me a while to find words, but the right environment and encourage that. It generally helps if they’re open as well; that’s something I really respect in other people because it’s the hardest thing for me to do, but some people do it with such ease. And someone who understands, or at least tries to understand, my abstractions in the way I think. Oh, and I would love it if they could teach me something about anything. I’m specifically enamored with people who are artists and/or can make things with their hands, even if it’s just like changing a tire. Age and appearance mean next to nothing.

    Do you enjoy comfort, sensory indulgence, relaxation? Are you physically hedonistic (parties, dancing, binges, good eating, etc.)? Do you focus finely on physical sensations, carefully savoring them?
    This is one of those questions that I feel like I need to expand on, but there aren’t really any words other than “no”. I enjoy some things, but I don’t “focus finely” on any physical sensation at all. I have to force myself to “be in the moment” because my mind always feels like it’s three steps ahead. And not in the psychic Ni way, but a scattered, disorganized way.

    Do you find yourself neglecting bodily concerns and pushing your body beyond reasonable limits (like skipping sleep or meals or the like)? If so, do you appreciate being encouraged to slow down and take care of yourself, or does it make you feel annoyed or mollycoddled?
    -Yes, I do neglect my body. I have oftentimes forgotten to eat or sleep because I’d be so wrapped up in something and not realize it til I pass out or double-over in hunger pain.
    -I appreciate non-verbal encouragement to slow down. I don’t like having someone just tell me that I need to stop and go do something or go to bed or eat (I’m guessing it’s back to the control issues), but if they’re just bringing me a sandwich or putting a blanket over me so I realize I’m tired, then I accept and appreciate it. Otherwise, I could stay up for days. And I have. But I got a lot done.

    11) Do you focus more on what you need to take care of at the moment, or on the end goal? Do you prefer an attitude of leaving no stone left unturned, or do you only focus on what you feel is necessary to reach your end goals? Are you thorough or sloppy? If neither applies to you, which do you prefer in other people?
    -I focus more on the end goal. As in, I think more about it. Oftentimes, I’ll think about it so much that I keep adding things to make it MORE AWESOME without realizing how much work that actually entails and then run out of steam before I’m almost completes. And I only focus on what I need to achieve my goals, though usually more sloppy than thorough. I’m not very detail-oriented, and appreciate it when other people don’t get so bogged down in the details that they can’t get the general point across.

    Are you forever chasing after new ideas and possibilities, or do you prefer dreaming up imaginative scenarios and fully fleshed-out plans? If neither applies to you, which do you prefer in other people?
    -I think both apply to me? I am always chasing after new ideas and possibilities. I dream about them and then flesh out plans on how to get there, though I would never call them “fully” fleshed out. For instance, if I’m planning a trip, I’ll plan how I’m getting there and (sometimes) where I’m staying and I’ll have a few ideas of what I want to do when I get there, but any more in-depth planning would really ruin the fun of it.

    Do you look for the hidden implications of concepts in analysis, and what they lead to? Or do you prefer to examine how concepts relate to each other? If neither applies to you, which do you prefer in other people?
    -How they relate to each other. I like having two ideas or theories and then comparing and contrasting to see how they each affect things differently and the implications of each to, ideally, determine which is better. Or how to combine them so that there is an even better theory that explains everything. I hate it when people insist on using a theory even though there are inconsistencies. “It works in this context but applying it to this one doesn’t work...” just stfu. It’s not a universal theory in that case. Sorry, it’s a sore issue. But um, definitely how concepts relate to one another.

    Do you solve all variables, difficulties and contingencies as they come up? Or do you prefer to pick the most likely outcome or most likely conclusion and plan with it in mind?
    This is a hard question. I come up with all possibilities possible, then figure out which one is more likely and go with that when faced with a problem. If I’m making a plan or something, however, I have my end goal in mind and come up with all the ways that it could go wrong, and then plan how to make them get back on par for the course.

    15) Are you prone to uncertainty or indecisiveness? When you have multiple opportunities to choose from, do you analyze them all? Or do you want to cut out the ones that aren’t likely or are least likely; pick just one?
    If I don’t have an opinion, I can be indecisive because I genuinely don’t care. But first I analyze everything and decide which one is the best logically and go with that. I start off by narrowing it down to what is Obviously Not Likely if nothing immediately jumps out at me and go from there.

    16) Are you open to any avenue that might offer potential opportunities? Or do you prefer to make sure the odds are in favor of a new avenue bringing benefits?

    The latter. I like to try new things, but I’m careful about the risks. I’m not going to just jump into something when there is a 50% chance of failure. Unless there is a 50% chance I get $100,000,000,000,000 and then the other 50% is having my hair cut a few inches.

    17) Are you assertive? Aggressive? Do you like it when other people are?

    I’m very much assertive. I don’t seem to be, but if shit needs to get done, I have no problem being the one to get it done, especially if it’s important (ie, the wellbeing of a friend is at stake.) I’m generally not aggressive, and even when people are aggressive to me, I tend to be more stable/assertive. I don’t really like when other people are aggressive, and I’m iffy on the assertiveness. There is such thing as too much and sometimes when other people are assertive, it just leads to us butting heads, but I don’t like it when others are passive and roll over on their backs at every turn, either.

    Are you able to relax? Or are you restless and fidgety?
    I tend towards restless and fidgety. I can sit still and nap, but as for just sitting around...I really can’t. I’m always doing multiple things at the same time, even if it’s just watching TV and being on the computer, or reading a book while I’m smoking. If I’m stuck having to do only one thing, I do get fidgety.

    Do you prefer concepts, principles, rules, procedures, etc. to be precise and lack ambiguity, or do you prefer simple solutions that offer (or as long as they offer) greater efficiency and productivity?

    I like generalities. Too many details and it gets tedious and boring. Give me a few things and let me get a general idea on how to use it and apply it as I see fit. The more efficient something is, the better.

    20) Are you a practical person in general? Elaborate.

    -It....depends. I think I’m practical, but I’m often told that I’m not. I tend to bite off more than I can chew with things and then fizzle out halfway through.

    21) Are you passionate? Emotional? Given to performance or histrionics? Do you enjoy those qualities in other people?
    
I get passionate about certain things in short bursts. Unfortunately it’ll burn fast and quick and then just burn out and I’ll find something new. I’m good at holding an audience and being charming and making people like me, but I wouldn’t say I’m over dramatic or prone to drama in the least. I wouldn’t mind someone who was excited about different topics, but I would prefer them to be able to teach me. As for the being charming and likable, I feel like that’s competition, really. As for other people+drama...I don’t mind listening to it so long as I’m not in the middle of it. I think it’s more of the “why people do what they do” interest that I have.

    22) Are you aware of when you're stepping on other peoples' toes, or offend them? When you're not liked?
    No, I’m not aware of when I’m stepping on toes or offending some one. As for when I’m not liked, I have no idea, which makes the weird “we’re acquaintances but not friends yet” phase a real pain for me. I have to be directly told “Hey, I like to hang out with you. Let’s go do something. It sounds like a lot of fun.” I tend to just assume that people don’t really like me unless they tell me otherwise. It makes it easier in the long run.

    23) Are you sensitive to others being emotionally hurt or offended?
    I’m bad at changing who I am to fit circumstances, so I do tend to “go to far” or step on toes. I try to understand that people react differently to different things, but mainly I can’t help but think that they really shouldn’t be so sensitive. I usually try to make sure everyone gets along and I crack jokes and make sure everyone is happy, but if I make a joke and someone is offended, I won’t apologize. If it’s a situation where I have to apologize, I twist it around and say that I’m sorry they were offended, but I won’t be sorry that they took a joke in an insulting way. Basically, I hate apologizing. Especially when people are being unreasonable about something.

    24) Would you say that the status of your personal relationships with people, your distance to them, is an important criterion for guiding your behavior?
    Yes? Maybe? I’m not quite sure what this question is asking.



    Pictures
    Not a lot of candid photos, I apologize, but hopefully here is a range:
    On the left; brown coat
    Fedora
    My natural environment
    On the right
    Most recent
    Archaeologist at work
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Video
    Last edited by bg; 11-20-2011 at 04:34 PM.

  2. #2
    under the bridge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    TIM
    Ne-LII
    Posts
    30
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    All this info leads me to think ENTp; Ne-ILE is my personal opinion.

    Where did you get this form, by the way? Did I miss seeing it here?

  3. #3
    FoxOnStilts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    TN
    TIM
    Fi-SLE 3w9 so/sp
    Posts
    790
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by under the bridge View Post
    All this info leads me to think ENTp; Ne-ILE is my personal opinion.

    Where did you get this form, by the way? Did I miss seeing it here?
    I janked it off of PersonalityNation

  4. #4

    Default

    You sound scattered. Thoughts seem to run all over the place - in a cool way, though, haha.
    I'd agree with ILE.

  5. #5
    Banned Jinxi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    TIM
    IEI-Ni 4w5 sx/sp
    Posts
    973
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Never mind ILE...watched the video, IEE it is.

  6. #6
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,955
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Uncertainty View Post
    You sound scattered. Thoughts seem to run all over the place - in a cool way, though, haha.
    I'd agree with ILE.
    Both Ne ego types are scattered one is scattered AFTER their internal structure of what will play out doesn't and then they give up and become scattered; watch this video shot by an ILE and how she plans to go to the chocolate store, and assumes things will play out in her mind, but when she's forgotten to take her money, is resorted back to just doing, whatever she can to finish off her video, hoping that ideas will come to her, but they don't so she ends the rest of the video in mumbo.

    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  7. #7

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    Both Ne ego types are scattered one is scattered AFTER their internal structure of what will play out doesn't and then they give up and become scattered; watch this video shot by an ILE and how she plans to go to the chocolate store, and assumes things will play out in her mind, but when she's forgotten to take her money, is resorted back to just doing, whatever she can to finish off her video, hoping that ideas will come to her, but they don't so she ends the rest of the video in mumbo.

    So you're saying ILEs are scattered when things don't work out the way they planned? Just clarifying, since I found what you wrote a bit difficult to read. How are IEEs, then?

    I personally don't find any reason to doubt her description of herself (like the idea of not being aware of emotional boundaries and when a line has been crossed as well as straightforwardness/bluntness), so wouldn't ILE make more sense?

  8. #8
    FoxOnStilts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    TN
    TIM
    Fi-SLE 3w9 so/sp
    Posts
    790
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by felafel View Post
    could you make that video *longer* ? lol. i see no prob. w/entp tbh, although i didn't read your *essay* and skipped through most of the video
    I can try to do part two of the video! That was only half.

    I do wish that more people would skim the essay though. I think it's a lot more descriptive of what I think/feel/react to things, whereas the video is just me trying to be entertaining and maybe say a few things here and there.

  9. #9
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,955
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    What ideas do you find yourself fitting or placing into systems?

    Do you have difficulty finding words for your thoughts/feelings?
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  10. #10
    FoxOnStilts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    TN
    TIM
    Fi-SLE 3w9 so/sp
    Posts
    790
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    What ideas do you find yourself fitting or placing into systems?
    I think this is another badly worded question (either that or I just don't relate to a lot of what you say), but ideas on everything fit into systems somehow, wouldn't you say. I'm always coming up with different ideas on the whosits and the whys people do things or I'll wonder why it rains more at night than during the day and come up with an explanation that I think makes sense with what I know, then try to confirm it.

    Another big one would be what I learn in school. I just did an article review where I had to take a professionally published article and critique it without using outside sources. This mean taking apart all the little details and pointing out what was inconsistent about it. Which was actually a lot more fun than I expected. I may have been too harsh on it, but really it was very sloppily done.

    Do you have difficulty finding words for your thoughts/feelings?
    Feelings definitely. That's why (as addressed in my video) it's better if I'm coaxed into explaining how I feel instead of just asked. "Hey, FoxOnStilts, how did this make you feel?" wouldn't work. I need someone who can say, "Hey FoxOnStilts, I bet this made you feel xyz" and then I can confirm or deny and eplain.

    Thoughts I don't really have trouble with. I'm good at the making connections between them. My favorite bits are taking an incredibly complex, jargony subject and relating it to others in simple terms. I wouldn't mind teaching because I'm good at getting people excited about my subject and dumbing down the most complex parts. I really don't think you can say you *know* something unless you can explain it to someone who has absolutely no background in it and have them understand.

  11. #11
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,955
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yeah, it is badly worded, because it's an abstract idea. Let me try again.

    Do you feel like you find ideas to optimize existing systems? Like broken or poorly functioning systems like school system, etc.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  12. #12
    FoxOnStilts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    TN
    TIM
    Fi-SLE 3w9 so/sp
    Posts
    790
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    Do you feel like you find ideas to optimize existing systems? Like broken or poorly functioning systems like school system, etc.
    No. I don't really work within a system, as it were. I find *my* way of doing something that works for me and I do it. If I have to, I can make it more streamlined, but not "efficient" in a way that would work for everyone and certainly not anything that could apply on a large scale. It's really just me being lazy and finding a way to get the most personal pay out from doing the least amount of work (because I am suuuper lazy). To use an analogy, it's like I make up my own shorthand that only I can read. It wouldn't work for everyone, maybe some people can do it, but in the long run its only real use is to make me get things done faster while other people have the same results going just a little bit longer.

  13. #13
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,955
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    "Such a view, however, would be quite false; the truth is, her feelings are intensive rather than extensive. Whereas, for instance, an extensive feeling of sympathy can express itself in both word and deed at the right place, thus quickly ridding itself of its impression, an intensive sympathy, because shut off from every means of expression, gains a passionate depth that embraces the misery of a world and is simply benumbed. "

    http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Jung/types.htm

    That's why I type you Fi
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  14. #14
    FoxOnStilts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    TN
    TIM
    Fi-SLE 3w9 so/sp
    Posts
    790
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Really, how is that related at all to anything I said? I genuinely have no idea where you get these crazy interpretations of yours. I don't offer sympathy, I'm not sympathetic, and I certainly don't consider myself as embracing of misery. Is Chapter X even directly relevant to socionics? I would much prefer a socionics source from you considering how out-of-context chapter X is with the rest of Jung's work.

    Just to entertain you, however, you can't pick and choose a sentence to fit. You can type me as Fi if you wish, but all sources (including chapter X) describe Fi in a way that I really don't relate to at all. I'd pick an Fe type over the ridiculousness that is me being Fi ego. If you want, I'll go through chapter X for you and highlight what doesn't fit, but that would be a very bright passage. Additionally, nothing about being delta makes sense, I'm not Te-seeking, and every relationship I have with people fits very well with ILE.

    It would also be better if you could try and read what I wrote and pick out specific points that suggest Fi over...well, any other function. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't glad that you are typing me IEE, though, because I hear you never type anyone correctly, so I'm probably on the right path with ILE.

  15. #15
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,955
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FoxOnStilts View Post
    Really, how is that related at all to anything I said? I don't offer sympathy, I'm not sympathetic, and I certainly don't consider myself as embracing of misery. Is Chapter X even directly relevant to socionics? I would much prefer a socionics source from you considering how out-of-context chapter X is with the rest of Jung's work.

    Just to entertain you, however, you can't pick and choose a sentence to fit. You can type me as Fi if you wish, but all sources (including chapter X) describe Fi in a way that I really don't relate to at all. I'd pick an Fe type over the ridiculousness that is me being Fi ego. If you want, I'll go through chapter X for you and highlight what doesn't fit, but that would be a very bright passage. Additionally, nothing about being delta makes sense, I'm not Te-seeking, and every relationship I have with people fits very well with ILE.

    It would also be better if you could try and read what I wrote and pick out specific points that suggest Fi over...well, any other function. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't glad that you are typing me IEE, though, because I hear you never type anyone correctly, so I'm probably on the right path with ILE.
    Fi doesn't offer sympathy. It's empathetic type;

    Your inability to relate what I wrote to what you said is weak Ti. Because Ti is a function that takes two documents, and eliminates contradictions and walks away with things that relate to one another.

    I have much better use of my Ti than you and I can take what you said and what I quoted and relate them to one another walking away with the essence and meaning of the two.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  16. #16
    FoxOnStilts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    TN
    TIM
    Fi-SLE 3w9 so/sp
    Posts
    790
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    It's empathetic type;
    That's another point in my favor then. What on earth have I said that suggests I'm empathetic at all? I outright said that it's impossible for me to read peoples faces.

    edit- to clarify, reading emotions on faces is inherently empathetic; "I see them with this expression, I know what it's like to have something cause this expression on them; feeling empathy."

  17. #17
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,955
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    And, this is why I don't type you ENTp and instead ENFp:

    ENTp "the seeker": "The Seeker is critical towards everything created earlier. He looks for new ways and alternatives. Having analyzed the situation and finding its dubious aspects, he may provoke split in an organization and create his own group of adherents." they try to make new ideas and systems of those ideas.

    http://socioniko.net/en/1.3.rels/dual-1p.html

    ENFp "the psychologist: "The Psychologist is just the kind of person who notices talents of the others, inspires them with belief in their capabilities, readily tells compliments. He notices even hidden capabilities and willingly encourages their development."

    I think ENFp fits you better
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  18. #18
    FoxOnStilts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    TN
    TIM
    Fi-SLE 3w9 so/sp
    Posts
    790
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    I think ENFp fits you better
    I think very not. I'm too impatient to play psychologist and I hate motivating people. And I'm terrible at giving compliments. I inspire people with beliefs of my capabilities and theirs when we're working to a common goal and it is beneficial to me to do so. It sounds selfish, but if I'm not getting anything out of it, I generally can't be bothered (I don't think anyone can, but that's another topic for debate).

  19. #19
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,955
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FoxOnStilts View Post
    I think very not. I'm too impatient to play psychologist and I hate motivating people. And I'm terrible at giving compliments. I inspire people with beliefs of my capabilities and theirs when we're working to a common goal and it is beneficial to me to do so. It sounds selfish, but if I'm not getting anything out of it, I generally can't be bothered (I don't think anyone can, but that's another topic for debate).
    You just said you were bad in Fe. Fe is the activation function of ILE; they are very good at it. The quote is directly from Jung's types.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  20. #20
    FoxOnStilts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    TN
    TIM
    Fi-SLE 3w9 so/sp
    Posts
    790
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    wikisocion on Activating function:
    The subject is more comfortable using this function than the suggestive function but still can only use it sporadically. If he isn't careful and directs it at an individual who does not value it, he will likely meet a harsh response, since they are almost sure to see it as a puerile gesture (more so than when he uses the suggestive function, usage of which comes off as more mature and well-considered, since he takes it more seriously in the first place). The subject's innate lack of balance in the mobilizing function can easily cause him to indulge in it recklessly or to sorely neglect it. It is best used in support of the suggestive function.

    If too much of this element is ambient, the person will get bored or even become repelled. He sees it as a necessary part of good living, but not a primary life goal.

  21. #21
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,955
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Do you have difficulty finding words for your thoughts/feelings?


    Feelings definitely. That's why (as addressed in my video) it's better if I'm coaxed into explaining how I feel instead of just asked. "Hey, FoxOnStilts, how did this make you feel?" wouldn't work. I need someone who can say, "Hey FoxOnStilts, I bet this made you feel xyz" and then I can confirm or deny and eplain.

    Thoughts I don't really have trouble with. I'm good at the making connections between them. My favorite bits are taking an incredibly complex, jargony subject and relating it to others in simple terms. I wouldn't mind teaching because I'm good at getting people excited about my subject and dumbing down the most complex parts. I really don't think you can say you *know* something unless you can explain it to someone who has absolutely no background in it and have them understand.

    My quote asked you if you were weak in Fe, you said yes because someone who is strong in Fe has a good ability to express their emotions and feelings in words.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  22. #22
    FoxOnStilts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    TN
    TIM
    Fi-SLE 3w9 so/sp
    Posts
    790
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    My quote asked you if you were weak in Fe, you said yes because someone who is strong in Fe has a good ability to express their emotions and feelings in words.
    I would really love to see some backup for this claim, because that goes against pretty much everything I've read/discussed about Fe.

  23. #23
    Darn Socks DirectorAbbie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Southwest USA
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    7,123
    Mentioned
    383 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    I just watched it. You spew -base like a pro. But you didn't get a good shot of the chocolates. I wish I could raise my eyebrows independently. I think you're ILE.

    LSE
    1-6-2 so/sx
    Johari Nohari

    Quote Originally Posted by Ritella View Post
    Over here, we'll put up with (almost) all of your crap. You just have to use the secret phrase: "I don't value it. It's related to <insert random element here>, which is not in my quadra."
    Quote Originally Posted by Aquagraph View Post
    Abbie is so boring and rigid it's awesome instead of boring and rigid. She seems so practical and down-to-the-ground.

  24. #24
    Blaze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    5,714
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    welcome foxonstilts, to the small club of female entps on this board! you do look like ILE in your pix....gorgeous.

    ILE

    those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often

  25. #25
    UDP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    "Come with me if you want to live"
    TIM
    LSE
    Posts
    14,907
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default



    This thread sort of reminds me as to why I faded out here.

    Anyway, Fox strikes me as very ILE > IEE.

  26. #26
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,955
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    My quote says that Fi becomes shut off from providing sympathy or expression of, you just said you don't provide sympathy.

    I'm reading from the BIBLE of socionics not an interpretation.

    " I don't offer sympathy, I'm not sympathetic, and I certainly don't consider myself as embracing of misery. "
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  27. #27
    FoxOnStilts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    TN
    TIM
    Fi-SLE 3w9 so/sp
    Posts
    790
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Maritsa; I don't see Chapter X as the "BIBLE" of socionics, and if you do, you should probably go read some other of Jung's work. If Chapter X is considered the end-all-be-all of socionics to others besides yourself, then that's a strike against the system itself.

    However, As delightful as this has been, I'm pretty much going to have to disregard most of what you say. It seems that you've been back-pedaling most of the time to see what you want to see, ascribing motives/reasonings/traits to me that don't exist at all, and, it's a waste of my time. Your definitions and sources are inconsistent with each other and anything else I've read, and these questions of yours grow more tiresome (mostly, I'm sure, because they were all answered in the OP.)


    Abbie; I obviously need to go back and rewatch this video because people keep mentioning this chocolate and I have no idea what they're talking about. O_o

  28. #28
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,955
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FoxOnStilts View Post
    Maritsa; I don't see Chapter X as the "BIBLE" of socionics, and if you do, you should probably go read some other of Jung's work. If Chapter X is considered the end-all-be-all of socionics to others besides yourself, then that's a strike against the system itself.

    However, As delightful as this has been, I'm pretty much going to have to disregard most of what you say. It seems that you've been back-pedaling most of the time to see what you want to see, ascribing motives/reasonings/traits to me that don't exist at all, and, it's a waste of my time. Your definitions and sources are inconsistent with each other and anything else I've read, and these questions of yours grow more tiresome (mostly, I'm sure, because they were all answered in the OP.)


    Abbie; I obviously need to go back and rewatch this video because people keep mentioning this chocolate and I have no idea what they're talking about. O_o
    You're disagreeing with the source that all Socionics, even wikisocion, which is just an interpretation of the original source; maybe you don't want to do socionics. Maybe you want to do your version of whatever.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  29. #29
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,955
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    You're going to continue guarding your thread from people who disagree with your type and you're going to garner support for your current typing (that's my Ni). I'm not changing your typing, because what I used, I typed you and that's it for me. I hope others who read what I wrote can decide between what I quoted and what you said and make up their own minds instead of being drones.

    You don't want the facts, you just want people to agree with your assumption.
    Last edited by Beautiful sky; 11-23-2011 at 06:35 AM.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  30. #30
    Local Hero Saberstorm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Isle of Man
    TIM
    Robespierre
    Posts
    2,125
    Mentioned
    68 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ok, I tried listening, but I could not hear all of it, even in a silent house with the volume on max. (You talk very quickly. So says the deaf US Marine...) I could go for ILE. You seem Alpha.

    (Now will you marry me?) J/K!!

  31. #31
    Decadent Charlatan Aquagraph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Continental Vinnland
    TIM
    OmniPoLR
    Posts
    3,961
    Mentioned
    127 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Forgive maritsa, she has issues with most things not Delta. Even people who were typed right, become wrong if typed so by Maritsa as well.
    You're a beautiful ILE creature. Just say something blunt, inconsiderate and hurtful to her (extra kudos if it's witty as well), show us your truly magnificent PoLR and prove your strong sways your .
    “I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in — and the West in general — into an unbearable hell and a choking life. - Osama bin Laden

  32. #32
    FoxOnStilts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    TN
    TIM
    Fi-SLE 3w9 so/sp
    Posts
    790
    Mentioned
    30 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Aquagraph View Post
    Forgive maritsa, she has issues with most things not Delta. Even people who were typed right, become wrong if typed so by Maritsa as well.
    I tried a few times, but I think it just went over her head. She seems to be lacking in a sense of humor.

  33. #33
    Decadent Charlatan Aquagraph's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Continental Vinnland
    TIM
    OmniPoLR
    Posts
    3,961
    Mentioned
    127 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FoxOnStilts View Post
    I tried a few times, but I think it just went over her head. She seems to be lacking in a sense of humor.
    Among other things, such as logic, non-imaginary boyfriend and charisma. But she doesn't have to care about my constant insults as she sees my weak and understands that it's just my insecurity speaking.

    Oh, did I mention I'm real good at PoLR? And growing even more so?

    Btw, I think you misquoted a bit.
    Last edited by Aquagraph; 11-23-2011 at 08:14 AM.
    “I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in — and the West in general — into an unbearable hell and a choking life. - Osama bin Laden

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •