I got way too much fear in my life already but I say that with the utmost reverence for king
I got way too much fear in my life already but I say that with the utmost reverence for king
Agatha Christie can inspire more fear in me then Stephen ever could, but that doesn't diminishes his genius at all. I did almost go insane when I watched 1408 in theaters though, that's some twisted shit. Loved it.
What's jojis type?
https://youtu.be/cw4-bqSpVdo
https://youtu.be/R3habuLgROU
He's the guy behind
Pink guy
https://youtu.be/OLpeX4RRo28
And
Filthyfrank
https://youtu.be/OFQQALduhzA
My own experience is that it's not until we actually interact that supervision shows itself. And when we interact it is not that I feel attacked or anything like that, just a strange inner feeling of uneasiness, that seems to come from nowhere, and also that the person seems to be in some strange way "above me" or "cooler than me", myself being gray. Even some kind of "compatibility" that makes things even more confusing. And this all just from simple everyday stuff like "Hi, what's up" There is something "devilish" about the supervision chemistry.
I often like watching Te people on youtube, like the woman you posted. The contrast with interacting with real people is huge.
Anyway, about her type. I think I have a problem with deciding about ego/superego. LSE/EIE LIE/ESE. I don't see it clearly because she has a strong persona. I see Te/Fe as base/role and Si/Ni as creative/polr, but to sort them out seems more difficult. But it's possible that I can't type her at all.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
that's a great description of supervision and I think its very true, because its an entire asymmetric dynamic that involves all the functions bouncing off eachother in a peculiar way. which means until you're in the person's presence certain functions are attenuated such that you may not feel the force of your supervisor to the full extent of what "supervision" really entails. for example, SEEs can blow me up in a moment, cause it usually takes me a while to make my point meanwhile they've got a crazy gish gallop going and they just bury you, same with ESE. online I can unwind any problems at my own pace which makes it much easier, so I don't feel nearly as supervised
@Tallmo @Bertrand
I actually described what I came to recognize and therefore name as Supervision after coming into Socionics based on observations of other people interactions/relationships. Because to be honest I'm yet to encounter someone who makes me feel exactly as described by theory.
EDIT: second part is now proven to be incorrect, so I took it off.
Last edited by PrettySavage; 11-04-2017 at 11:45 AM.
Acacia Brinley Clark (acaciacutie), ESE-Si:
2:05 onward, so much advice...not:
Ryan Higa: IEE
Maybe for Sean: EII
She seems ESI. Lots of Fi language in the first video (which arguably could be scripted), and in the second one she seems concerned with all the small details of the wedding while simultaneously seeming sort of naive and prone to making factual errors (his absurd jokes seem to go completely over her head). Also shamelessly advertises a scummy spam app in the first minute of the video. The second video as a whole also is about the rather "boring" and practical subject of planning a wedding with lots of attention to the budget.
Jaclyn Glenn - LSE
Honestly... I may be wrong and working off stereotypes, but something right here is super fucking Delta.
I normally trust people right away and then I'm proven wrong and then I'm disappointed every time which is like you know learn your lesson but I don't so I don't I just don't want to make this video because I think a lack of aggression in certain social settings is interpreted of weakness and I really kind of hate that and it's not so much that I don't like have emotional reactions to people when they treat me like shit but it's more that like I'm kind of dumbfounded because I trusted this person you know I make friends with people and have certain expectations in my mind of how you treat someone who is your friend or who is you know a partner in a relationship or who is a family member like you have certain expectations of these people and you give them the benefit of the doubt a lot of times.
Last edited by chrys; 11-10-2017 at 06:41 PM.
What type is this guy?
I'm torn between ILE and SEI for Simone Giertz. Alpha irrational but she doesn't struggle with Fe afaics. her Fe has a self-producing quality to it.
Last edited by wasp; 11-15-2017 at 06:42 AM.
Simone Giertz - SEI
JoseChoaTV - mb SEE
You wanted to be typed "correctly" without giving adequate typing material.
Now you want your disagreement to be taken seriously, while you are still doubting even in own type.
Also you overestimate a single mismatch in the situation when real average typing match between even experienced typers is <50% what makes mismatches common (to decide about match you need several tens of typings, at least; real match - when both did not know external opinions beforehand). Besides you have no objective basis to disagree with me.
To understand types better you may look at my bloggers list in the signature. For you it's more reasonable to trust more to who is far more experienced than you.
It's funny to see Socionics fans from Korea.
Enough typing material was provided for pages to your arrival, prior not to mention interactions with other members, you're the one stuck in your beliefs that video is the only and true method. All the while hiding yourself, you're a hypocrite.
I have said several times already: I ALREADY KNOW MY TYPE, I HAVE NO DOUBTS. Other people who are certain of their type opt to not put them up on their profile, if that's what you implying.
As for "objective" basis please, that word doesn't belong in your mouth and everyone knows.
And Socionics is not a sport or art form, I'm not a "fan".
And trusting you? "Reasonable"? You're not an authority on anything but mistyping, so thanks but no thanks.
Jaclyn Glenn - F-N
Ok, I watched a little more and Gamma SF is possible (again, LIEs may *value* dressing for success but are less likely to be competent in the area of managing physical appearance due to weak sensing and ethics). I don't really feel like pursuing this typing further though.
Superficially looks IEE. Lots of NeFe, ESE is also possible.
ILE is possible. She seems technically oriented but also tends to fail completely at the hands-on part or making them actually work (hence the "shittiness"). Making a machine to feed you certainly seems like valued Si and more like suggestive Si.
She is also attuned to skill acquisition - when she got bored being locked in the bathroom she decided to try to teach herself a new skill. She also seems to be constantly doing new projects, again Ne/Te/extroversion. The common theme here is strength in ideation + weakness in execution.
Delta extrovert is worth considering too, not so much SEI IMO.
edit: also, it's worth noting she doesn't put much effort into grooming/clothes/physical appearance. Her hair is messy
Last edited by Exodus; 11-15-2017 at 10:03 PM.
She's definitely ExE, has a whole Walter Mercado thing going on. I don't see though, she doesn't give off conviction and to be honest, it all sounds like the Barrum Effect. Way to vague and generalized just sounds like she's repeating stuff she read somewhere, doesn't seem like she's intimate with the concept
Joni Patry - some F
Of course she's always talking about it, that's her occupation. As for predicting Trump election, that doesn't point to on its own at all, because the ones that pointed at Hillary weren't even trying to predict anything either. They were going with the most probable scenario, which just happened to be the one everyone preferred too.
I knew Trump would win two for two reasons: first, it was predecided, there was never a choice in first place, the whole election was a sham. Second, Trump had an emotional command over a mass of people akin to ******. Not that I think those two share a type at all, but the factor that made both very effective was the same, no real substance necessary.
I have issues with designing as a program or creative function to anyone who can accurately tell the future because I actually believe 100% in psych powers, I just don't think they are the same as cognitive functions at all. I for once come from a family involved in things like that so maybe I'm influenced by that knowledge and experience, because my ESE grandma was a seer who channeled spirits and read tarot. But in "normal life" it was pretty obvious she had no skills.
In any case, I don't know much about her neither am I interested enough to watch more, so this are just my two cents.
By that logic, then I can be nothing but a Ego type. I don't disagree with anything you've said about what is about, just don't see it in the one video you posted.
Had I followed this woman like I believe you do (?) I'd be able to spot a pattern ir there is one, my comment was on the basis that isolated, I can' t attribute what she's saying to use. She's talking about themes, but how much comes from her versus external sources? That's what I was getting at.
I used to be heavily into western astrology from a very early age until about four years ago, then I switched to Chinese astrology. Numerology is a passion of mine that came from my childhood too and has survived the test of time and my many belief updates. I'm not into Indian astrology but I follow my Dosha recommendations and felt a big change in my life since I began.
Besides numerology, tarot reading and dream interpretaion are my specialities. I've been doing it for people for years now, and have set a record of being highly accurate.
I'm rambling here but the point is, if what she's doing is a product (accurate esoteric predicting and interpretation of events and feelings), then anyone who can do it is Ego, including myself.
Of course I know you didn't claim that is only about esoteric/ spiritual things. But the other natural dot connecting leading to the aha! moments of insight...well I thought everyone did that, at least I do.
If not then it would explain why it frustrates me so much when people fail to see what to me it's obvious ( though not explicit or always externally apparent), I thought it was just intellectual laziness.
I would like more opinions on Good Mythical Morning. I think Rhett is SLE and Link is IEE. Link has a very similar personality to mine. The only problem with this is I uasuslly have a distaste for SLE myself and I (and Link) quite like Rhett.
And the try guys from BuzzFeed?
Keith- SEI-Fe
Zach- EII
Eugene- ILI (he actually tested INTJ on a mbti vid)
Ned- ESE
What's this guys type lol
https://youtu.be/-qRNnN9M7cc
https://youtu.be/9pZacP_tGc0
I can't tell the type of the guy in the video because he's too much of a creepy dickhead.
Cuivienen is nothing like that guy. Cuivienen may sometimes overshare what's on his mind to a point beyond parody, but as soon as he masters that, he's going to be a very adept, desirable guy.
The guy in the vid, on the other hand, will die a dickhead.