Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 44 of 44

Thread: Female LIIs, INTj women

  1. #41

    Join Date
    Jun 2022
    TIM
    SLI
    Posts
    1,437
    Mentioned
    81 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default


    Ruby Granger
    mb

  2. #42
    Ikite iru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,565
    Mentioned
    268 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nifl View Post

    Ruby Granger
    mb
    Seems IEI. I really have a hard time seeing my type uploading videos on youtube, especially since I often feel like I don't have any subjective feelings to share. I mean she has video ideas like "living as a romantic poet"
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  3. #43
    Ikite iru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,565
    Mentioned
    268 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default



    This person is maybe LII but I'm not entirely convinced. Says she is a driven person and looks a lot into the camera. Also looks somewhat like @Aster, so maybe IEI, but it's one of the better examples

    Too many fake LII out there who are actually just IEI that think they are logical types, like this one

    https://youtu.be/EeaKBLZn6mg
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  4. #44

    Join Date
    Jun 2022
    TIM
    SLI
    Posts
    1,437
    Mentioned
    81 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default


    Teri Hatcher


    Katie McGrath
    Last edited by nifl; 12-30-2022 at 10:51 PM.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •