You mean what's boring about them? Their boringness, I suppose.
Also yeah, people in this thread are gay for not posting LSE women. Won't watch fag spawns.
You mean what's boring about them? Their boringness, I suppose.
Also yeah, people in this thread are gay for not posting LSE women. Won't watch fag spawns.
No, it's our predictability, of course. Even our spontaneity is predictable. You even know what my next post will be, and I don't have to tell you.Originally Posted by poli
Actually you're not boring or predictable to me, even YOU can be confusing, trust me. You just need to get involved in better RPGs.
loialksnfjkawejkthiudrsyoihsdrty
Mulgrew does an impeccable Katharine Hepburn impression too
Dats hip
Wow, I've never seen here like this before. I think I'm getting infatuated with her. And she's only ten years older than I am! Look how cute she is:
A much more irrational vibe in this pic.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
She seems pretty physically tense tin that pic, more than I'd imagine seeing from any irrational in a candid photo like that. She's pretty fucking cool in that vid though.
EIE tritype 5w4, 4w5, 9w1
As far as we can discern, the sole purpose of human existence is to kindle a light in the darkness of mere being.
Carl Jung, "Memories, Dreams, Reflections", 1962
J. Robbins - Si-LSE
p . . . a . . . n . . . d . . . o . . . r . . . a
trad metalz | (more coming)
Rebecca Solnit: ESTj-Te 1w9
the woman on this show: ESTj-Se 1w9
Lying, Spending Spouses
Colbie Caillat: LSE-Te
on topic of whether Si-creative/Ni-PoLR are capable of theoretical/abstract thinking
this is Steven Gubser, professor of physics at Princeton, I typed him as Te-LSE and likely e6
Last edited by silke; 12-29-2013 at 07:45 AM.
wtf he's such a nerd
AronRa: Te-ESTj, E8?
I don't get how you people type. Doesn't look anything like an LSE; he's an intuitive type.on topic of whether Si-creative/Ni-PoLR are capable of theoretical/abstract thinking
this is Steven Gubser, professor of physics at Princeton, I typed him as Te-LSE and likely e6
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
define boring...
maybe my d-cousin is boring by your standards
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Reply With Quote
