Aamir Khan (Bollywood actor): Te-ESTj
He reminds me of Eminen to a certain extent. The similarities are more pronounced in his videos (i.e. in terms of facial expression, the way they talk and gesticulate, energy level) as compared to their photos:
Aamir Khan (Bollywood actor): Te-ESTj
He reminds me of Eminen to a certain extent. The similarities are more pronounced in his videos (i.e. in terms of facial expression, the way they talk and gesticulate, energy level) as compared to their photos:
There's a fairly good chance that Aamir Khan could be an Indian clone of my husband!Originally Posted by eunice
Aamir Khan (Bollywood actor): Te-ESTj
This helps me in thinking that I am correct in typing my hubby as an LSE, though I still sometimes consider SEE and some here have suggestedleading function for him or even IEE. I just find my husband too ambitious and competitive to be
When interacting with my husband and others of this type I notice they quite often have this way of portraying with their face and speech something which conveys that they have spoken something important...though often it was not really that significant but still it works for them and is difficult to resist, lol.
Aamir also does what I am attempting to describe and here is a good example of this at 32 seconds through the below video clip:
Last edited by Hays; 07-02-2012 at 02:46 AM.
woow major joshua jackson resemblance
is this set LSE-ishly or what
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
I can watch this LSE work for hours on end and I do
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vs6_fUPVf4g
Maritsa's quick method of typing an LSE:
Watch the way they talk. LSE have a tendency to not be very dramatic mouth movers. They lock the muscles on either side of their lips so the lips look like they hardly move but in actuality when you listen to them their voice comes out stronger and more apparent than the lip movement. Watch carefully and you'll notice the same.
-
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Reply With Quote
