Could be LSE; has an LSE smile, but the pic isn't the best. Why don't you get her to stop drinking so much?Originally Posted by Agarina
I'm very effective at getting LSE to follow my "guides."
If the EII, knows them and out of concern says, "you're drinking too much, it's causing these things" and they can see it's detrimental to the things they care about, they have discipline and care about someone enough, they can stop doing things that are not good for them.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
<--
^ LSE confirm
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Cough COUGH COUGH^ LSE confirm
<--
Ive a LSE friend who look EXACTLY like your friend, Agarina. I almost hear her voice looking at the photo.
"The final delusion is the belief that one has lost all delusion."
-- Maurice Chapelain
I think one of my best friends is a non boring LSE. He's one of the funniest people I know. Hard to think of why though.. he might use more Ne. Strange sense of humor. Otherwise, he's cool for usual ST reasons (he's a airplane buff and mechanic).
This is him and his wife. link
Yeah, LSE
His wife is ESI? How do they get along? How long have they been married?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Yeah, I think ESI. Married at least 10 years. One of the happier couples I know.Yeah, LSE
His wife is ESI? How do they get along? How long have they been married?
How does he show off his HA?
"Ne : behavior aiming at showing how original and creative you can be, but making too much out of obvious and trivial ideas. "
I'm sorry stay, I have the tendency for extracting my favorite functions even from Te creativesLet me know when you get too tired of me.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I've known him forever, but I haven't seen how he uses it professionally. He sort of talks about his creativity at work, and/or gets pissed if his ideas aren't being listened to, but I don't know the specifics. But I like said, he has a bizarre sense of humor. Me and his wife find him funny at least. He's also more outgoing (could be an extratim thing). He reminds of some LSE-Si celebrities who are loosened up like that. He definitely not "all business".How does he show off his HA?
"Ne : behavior aiming at showing how original and creative you can be, but making too much out of obvious and trivial ideas. "
I'm sorry stay, I have the tendency for extracting my favorite functions even from Te creatives
i'm not sure i've ever met an LSE
but i may have, and i wouldn't exactly describe him as "boring". more like, inaccessible and preoccupied. (which i associate with ESTx's in general)
he reminds me of an SLE, but something is different. he seems more serious about whatever he says....? or at least jokes in a different way - with a different vibe i guess?
less playful, i suppose. in my eyes. but still very playful and energetic seeming? just not an ass. haha.
edit: ex., i imagine that if the possible LSE dude i know were to yell at me/confront me for some reason, he would be quite serious about it. but then again, i would be surprised if that were how he'd approach confrontation anyway... i imagine he would just correct me in a sort of calm and direct way but not really show much frustration (but probably show a little, not meant to affect me, but it'd probably make me feel stupid).
whereas the SLE i know would probably yell at me and be seemingly pissed off momentarily, laugh (/cackle) soon after and then go back to not giving a fuck about whatever i did that bothered him. then i'd yell at him and he wouldn't care.
i am conjecturing quite a bit about the LSE though; i've interacted with him much less.
Last edited by pluie; 06-29-2012 at 06:41 PM.
"If you can find out little melodies for yourself on the piano it is all very well. But if they come of themselves when you are not at the piano, then you have still greater reason to rejoice; for then the inner sense of music is astir in you. The fingers must make what the head wills, not vice versa."- Robert Schumann
they are serious, yes. they can have fun though, but on their terms and in their own timing. not spontaneously playful. More like "let's toss the football at 2:00 after I get these dishes done." LOL
IEI-Fe 4w3
lol
makes sense.
"If you can find out little melodies for yourself on the piano it is all very well. But if they come of themselves when you are not at the piano, then you have still greater reason to rejoice; for then the inner sense of music is astir in you. The fingers must make what the head wills, not vice versa."- Robert Schumann
I really liked Matt Damon in We Bought a Zoo, taking on a Delta ST fatherly role.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
I saw this movie We Bought A Zoo, and completely agree with you, I thought the dad was Delta ST as well. Big time dual seeking on his part, searching for a home for his family. Predictable movie, though. He seemed very typically Delta ST. Good call, park.
Yeah, thanks Wacey.
Benjamin Mee (the original author of the story) also seems like he could be LSE.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Another ethical typed as LSE by Maritsa? That's just impossible.
Haha, the problem is not how a single one person types some other person, problem is how it is viewed and filtered through this consensus on this site some other sites. I bothered to check and they sing the same tune [the sites] - NF.
So which kind of ST are you, Maritsa?
Oh man, this forum.
I don't have a socionics viewpoint on Ashton Kutcher, nor do I consider it valuable to have one.
And yet you still managed to come up with a comment, besides, the more celebrities Maritsa dates, not only Maritsa, but people on this forum after typing them their duals, the less threads like these. I mean, when people actually focused more on doing than talking, I'm sure, none of it would have even taken place.
Indeed!
I've been reading your posts too much.
Well then, good for you, now get off my tits.Indeed!
I've been reading your posts too much.
Let me make you more efficient, don't read his posts at all.Indeed!
I've been reading your posts too much.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
People who type their LSE duals versus your LSE duals, don't need to be told who is LSE and who is not, just like with every single sociotype, unless you usurped yourself the monopoly on typing LSE duals who are, in fact, out there on a screen. Easy there, I'm sure every single one of you is going to dualise with them, I mean let's look at this realistically once and for all...
Oh, and the highest type of efficiency is that which can utilize existing material to the best advantage, and I don't think you're going to squeeze anything more out of Jim, he's already efficient in his time spent on here, but it is your call, Maritsa.
So, when are you going to marry Ashton Kutcher?
LSE's are a buncha coke snarfing mc****** fucking Jewbee scooby doos
Oh hey, Ath.
Anyway, Maritsa, are you going to continue talking to yourself, there's so many Kutcher like "LSEs" waiting for your attention. You know, efficiency.
Consensus ahoy, land ahoy.
http://www.justjared.com/2012/04/18/...ay-steve-jobs/
Last edited by Absurd; 12-22-2012 at 06:29 PM.
Liev Shreiber
Te-LSE.
And many of his movie characters.
Last edited by wacey; 02-23-2013 at 12:00 PM.
You presented yourself on a silver plate to an LSE, but the guy was too drunk to recognize a great opportunity to get laid! Awesome, non-boring LSE indeed!
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
CG????!!!! NO. I wanted to listen and see if I could train my ear to listen to the tone of the LSE speaking; but he noticed me too fast and stopped talking. Bummer.
anyway, I have a boyfriend, if you haven't heard...Jadae, Michael.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Here are some video examples.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrYSG...=results_video
Watch this movie, the guy, Liev Shreiber, is so stereotypical TE-LSE and his friend, Ned Beatty I could say is Fi-EII. A nice example of this strange duality pairing:
"Spring Forward"
http://www.reelz.com/movie/208067/sp...OnReelzChannel
The movie is very "Delta", lots of just chatting around at work, being productive and taking about personal convictions, all in a non-chalant no nonsense way. There is even a IEE who shows up as a love interest for Liev. Really heartfelt BUT nonsentimental. I liked it, maybe some other deltas could watch it and let me know. It is on netflix. The trailer really over does the emotional aspects, tthere just is not a string quartet blasting in the background all the time. "Spring Forward". Plus I worked as a landscaper for private companies and a city municipality, so I could relate to the job the two actors were doing.
Last edited by wacey; 01-17-2013 at 06:23 PM.
Bla bla bla. I see right through your rationalizations: you are keeping your options open. You don't fool me!
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
He was 90 years old. Need I say more? LOL
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Lots of women fall for older guys, it happens every day!
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
Ah, Delta NFs are so cute when they try to hide their horniness.
[| NP | 3[6w5]8 so/sp | Type thread | My typing of forum members | Johari (Strengths) | Nohari (Weaknesses)
You know what? You're an individual, and that makes people nervous. And it's gonna keep making people nervous for the rest of your life. - Ole Golly from Harriet, the spy.
For some reason I have a negative reaction to that actor's appearance creeping up from somewhere deep in my memory. Maybe it's some movie where he played an asshole villain that left traces in my brain, I don't know. Will watch Spring Forward, even though the trailer doesn't really deliver.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
He often plays a slimy asshole villian. For example, "Phantoms", "Scream", and "The Manchurian Candidate". So that could be it. He is funny enough in a play on broadway that also stars Scarlett Johansson, your starlett crush?
I see you became an adult without my consent, consetingadult.
Reply With Quote
