Originally Posted by
Rick
Originally Posted by
implied
http://www.socionika.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=201
not a bad topic on her. i'm surprised at the discrepancy of opinions here.
Those folks favor the "crystal ball" VI approach, rather than simply studying people directly. I think we are more advanced here then they are, actually.
i tend to agree that they do a sort of "crystal ball" approach and v.i. is hardly an exact science (btw, i do like that you reference videos for this.) i just find it sort of intriguing that one board would say ENTj/INTp while another board may say ISFp. i could easily buy her as ESFp. i don't see much
, either. i do, however, find it telling that no one really wanted to peg her as a
type. i think gamma works well.