Last edited by silke; 07-08-2017 at 08:12 AM. Reason: updated links
Has a bit of the ISFP-ish look again.
MAYBE I'LL BREAK DOWN!!!
Originally Posted by vague
here she looks ISFp
she also looks a bit like alyssa milano and a teensy bit like hilary duff though
Check out my Socionics group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546362349012193/
Shes yummy.. She seems innocent and naughty at the same time
ENFp (Unsure of Subtype)
"And the day came when the risk it took to remain closed in a bud became more painful than the risk it took to blossom." - Anaďs Nin
Yeah, that's ISFp.Originally Posted by meatburger
I thought the 3rd photo of her reminded me of the isfp pic under the VI game in socionics.com.....
wow you went SEI? there was another thread in here i think she was typed INTp.
I believe she is p and a T because her "feminine" qualities like style of dress don't seem to be natural for her but an afterthought (i hope the T females relate, i do myself)
a good word for SEI is simplicity, not sure if that is innocence or not. scarlett seems quite aware/mature and appears that way too; i find SEIs have a disconnect between the two-- that's what makes them "cute" and such.
Not ISFP, perhaps ESTP?
Well I am back. How's everyone? Don't have as much time now, but glad to see some of the old gang are still here.
Whatever she is, she is my favorite current mainstream actress My inner-pervert is showing
Currently she's in my favourite female actresses top list:Originally Posted by Jadae
How did you derive SEE?Originally Posted by Rick
Well, I watched several video interviews:Originally Posted by eunice
I think she is base . Part of it is the assertive, masculine voice and bits of forcefulness when she's being funny. Part is the heavy facial features and impulsive body movements. In the last video she reminds me of Britney Spears. Also, she's not very expressive in the way she talks ( ), but mostly just smiles, chuckles, and says nice words here and there.
not a bad topic on her. i'm surprised at the discrepancy of opinions here.
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
Those folks favor the "crystal ball" VI approach, rather than simply studying people directly. I think we are more advanced here then they are, actually.Originally Posted by implied
i tend to agree that they do a sort of "crystal ball" approach and v.i. is hardly an exact science (btw, i do like that you reference videos for this.) i just find it sort of intriguing that one board would say ENTj/INTp while another board may say ISFp. i could easily buy her as ESFp. i don't see much , either. i do, however, find it telling that no one really wanted to peg her as a type. i think gamma works well.Originally Posted by Rick
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
I agree with Rick's typing.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
That thread was funny. They were looking only at intuitive types (bizarre, huh??), and Lytov pops in and says that she is known in Hollywood for being sexually uninhibited, and they argued back, "you mean ILIs and LIEs can't be uninhibited??"Originally Posted by implied
Here's a somewhat more respectable forum (in Russian) where she is typed primarily as SEE, with a few saying SEI and one dude from the Vilnius school popping in with LIE again. Lytov seems undecided as to SEE vs. IEE.
So I think the Vilnius boys are smoking something.
Originally Posted by Rick
i think she'd be ethical sub SEE. she's relaxed yet sort of aggressive, too. she has the sort of assertiveness that you can sort of "feel." (honestly, she reminds me of my dad's ex-wife, who i thought was ESI.) i agree that she has a really typical "heavy" lower face like some SEEs do. i think this has been nearly the most reliable SEE giveaway i've seen so far.
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
Yeah I guess that makes sense.Originally Posted by Rick
I 'd like to jump her bones.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
I would say SEE
Gosh I wish I looked like her
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
ESFp has always worked for me.
i forget socionics, but i say more SEI.
whenever the dog and i see each other we both stop where we are. we regard each other with a mixture of sadness and suspicion and then we feign indifference.
Jerry, The Zoo Story by Edward Albee
I thought Parker would love this thread lol
I've heard Ni-ENFj, and I see no real reason to think otherwise.
Her character in Iron Man 2 was kind of ungodly hot.
so overrated. plastic surgery and still theres a plethora of other hot girls out there. The chick in watchmen for her acting and sexuality >>>>
I would've thought she'd be an Ni type.
Types examples: video bloggers, actors
For some reason she always seems like she's on the verge of becoming fat.
lmao, it's the cheekbones.
I think SEI.