You can view the page at http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...SFp-by-Beskova
You can view the page at http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...SFp-by-Beskova
Wasn't Napoleon very good at maths and therefore went to the artellery besides that the artellery was less aristocratic than the chivalry?
You know i am a asking type by reinin dichotomy. They tend to hide statements behind questions.
Don't cut it just yet, I like this conversation. It hides questions behind statements.
she's banned
Napoleon was an exception among all men. Why wouldn't he be an exception among ESFps...?
He was a genius, and geniuses - even being Ti polr - can perfectly master mathematics or any science. In fact, in Gulenko's ESFp-Fi description it's written "Calculates well". Hahaha
I met Napoleon, he thinks like a computer. To the point where it's actually stupid. Need to write instructions like code, and have no mistakes, otherwise error. I can do it, but it's annoying.
Actually, calculating is a Te thing, not Ti. SEE have mob Te so they’ll do fine with calculations.
If Napoleon is SEE-Fi, it means either D (Te+Fe) or N (Ti+Fi) subtype and in which case, is going to be good at calculating. I was always the top math student from grade school through college. I scored the highest test scores in 200 and 300 level college calculus classes. I can do anti-derivatives in my sleep. I calculate probability of basically everything because that’s just how I think. My LSI-N dad makes fun of how “uptight” I am because I am very calculating (finances, expenditures, time, etc.). He’s super Ti but he don’t care about calculations (ignoring Te). My mom is SEE-D and her master’s is in economics and she’s a CPA. She’s worked for big corporations handling their multimillion dollar accounts to the exact penny.
Cognitive type doesn’t measure intelligence or lack thereof, just shows how a person thinks. For one to show that they’re vulnerable with Ti is to show internal inconsistency, someone who doesn’t live their life in an orderly or methodical way. Ti isn’t about “figuring things out.” It’s about the constraints of what one already accepts, the rigidity of logical concepts that cannot be changed. SEE is Ti PoLR because they commonly don’t adhere to any structure, but that doesn’t mean they’re stupid or can’t learn.
I still think Napoleon could be an LIE...