Humor me. Watch the video. I think you'll be glad you did.
http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/sa..._daughter.html
And if you think she's not SEE then you're dumb.
Humor me. Watch the video. I think you'll be glad you did.
http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/sa..._daughter.html
And if you think she's not SEE then you're dumb.
Yup, willpower and overcoming difficult situations and talking about it. Very little rosy colored Ne (idealism or possibility of something that could exist that isn't realistic) in there.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I'm jealous, she speaks so fast, so fluidly, so extravertingly.
quite a bit of Fi, the injustice of things...feeling reactions based on judgement of things.
Glimpse of Ni, using the experiences of the past to understand the coming things.
Nice amount of Ne there, in covering what many people will think of the poems.
Fe demonstrative about the Anderson deal there.
Back to Se in "conquer" your fears kind of way. Strong will.
Back to Ne in finding the best way to do something, exploring options.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
If I have to hear Colbie Cailet (ESFp 7w6) on the radio one more time, Im going to ice pick my ears out. Its the same shit over and over. At least Michael Buble (ESFp 2w3) changes the themes and tone, even if its all still radio pop + really oddly hyper creative Fi.
Fuck you. I love Colbie Caillat. And chances are she's Ne not Se base.
She is wiseWhy I love LSEs:
beyond words
beautiful within
her soul
brighter than
the sun
lovelier than
love
dreams larger
than life
and does not
understand the
meaning of no.
Because everything
through her, and in her, is
"Yes, it will be done."
Originally Posted by Abbie
She seems nice, but a little forward in a way that makes me just roll my eyes.