too loud feels like it's for show. too quiet feels like theres shame in it.
theres more romance in quiet though. like you're so sure it doesn't need to be confirmed. the nice thing about loud is feeling like someone is proud of having your regard.
choosing one though, I'd go with quiet.
.Originally Posted by kassie
Well gee, wouldn't you guys like it both ways? Save one for parties and roller coasters and reserve the other for the bed, unless you like to mix the two
Both are awesome and relevant in the right context.
IEE Ne Creative Type
Someand role lovin too. (
) I
too...
!!!!!!
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Both are awesome and relevant in the right context.
Wouldn't it be actually best to have an almost "secret" relationship? To a person you can really trust, I mean. You don't need anyone to validate a relationship, nor is it anyones business who you like and why. This way, nobody would be interfering, it would be just you and the other person. Everything that matters, actually.
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
Wouldn't it depend on if you were deliberately keeping it secret? If you're purposefully keeping it hidden from others...then those others are already interfering, even if that interference is merely by letting your thoughts of them influence your actions in this relationship.
IEE 649 sx/sp cp
Ah, idk, I don't even think about loud love as something having to do with boasting with other people about your relationship. More like you know...loud stuff. Idk, like having sex outdoors, lol.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
For me? Yes, absolutely. For most people I know, not really. Or perhaps I'm wrong.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
My boyfriend says "I love you" to me at least 5 to 10 times a day; he's LSE. Even sometimes, when he's in bed with me, he'll turn around, half asleep and kiss me and tell me he loves me. He's very very affectionate with me, hugs and kisses; he'll cook for us and take out the garbage and do the laundry; he'll review next day plans with me and calls me SWEETIE. I call him HONEY.
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 10-24-2011 at 02:03 AM.
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
HI CILI WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?!@#Steamy.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
One of my dance teachers is IEE and she finds it weird to hear people in supermarkets call their SOs "honey" and "darling" when she calls her husband "boofhead"...
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Why do EII's have so much trouble figuring this out.
Reply With Quote
