Thanks, makes some sense. [Please note I type as Fe suggestive not Fe mobilising for the rest of my post.] I've had the experience with Fe egos where they usually are fine but then sometimes make a big deal out of something and then yeah I would listen to that totally. Even if at the same time it all just sounds like drama the way they put it lol, but I think the "dramatic expressing" makes it lighter for me somehow so as not to feel too reprimanded in some too hostile way. But yeah those warnings stick in my mind forever afterwards. And I find only Fe bases (at least I think they are Fe base) are able to do it in that way that I remember it forever.
Anyway I am thinking more on your previous post.
It all sounds a lot like trust issues too and some extra paranoia. Where you said
"does this person like me or are they just being nice", yeah that sounds like seriously trust issues which I personally did develop too after a while in life. After seeing enough people who would be like, being nice while having well-hidden self-serving goals or being unreliable in major ways.
More trust issues:
"The underlying thread is never being 100% certain about how people relate to you." Yeah, well I've experienced this in an intensified way after the above experiences, it isn't fun. How I solve it is, I often just don't give a shit. I was never 100% certain on it but I never really cared before it got intensified, then I was pissed enough after a while and went back to ignoring that kind of bullshit. I also did get better at perceiving nuances in how much someone actually cares or how much they don't care, like how much of it is social niceties, or in-the-moment enjoyment of "emotional connection", and how much of it is actually deeper based in a more reliable care/like where it is possible to trust more and let down the guard some.
But yeah overall, where you say
"are more attuned to understanding who really likes the Fi POLR and who doesn't", that I found to be a very useful skill to try and develop yeah. Tho not like Fi PoLR Iguess because it was always a no-brainer to me to see it in less close relationships/social situations/other situations if someone's just trying to do bullshit flattery or they genuinely are involved in the interaction, with genuine enough expressions. But in closer relationships, that's where I lack ability to see the nuances enough, OK I can see the person likes me but not beyond a point or yes...? That part gets complicated.
So your example where
"Fi POLR: "I can never tell if X likes me or not."
Fe Creative: "X likes you just fine s/he's just cranky.""
It sounds pretty cool, really, like, it just sounds like too easy. lol
Except I never bring it up like the Fi PoLR does. Even with the "trust issues" thing, I'm not as interested as to go as far to actually discuss such concerns with others. It just isn't enough on my mind. Because I don't really put stock into some temporary bad mood having any meaning for the entire relations with the person unless it's some really hostile thing. That tbh is when such advice would be useful to me. But especially when it comes to relationships that I wish to consider close.
And that's where I say this would be really useful and make some things a lot easier Lol
I still have one question. You also mentioned Fe creatives
"provide constant external emotional responses that the Fi POLR can read", but considering Fe suggestive descriptions, those also talk about how Fe suggestive really strongly needs the clarity on how others are predisposed to them. Like even more than Fe mobilising. Idk, I deal with it fine when I don't have that clarity. Ofcourse in a closer relationship it gets important to be clear on it & I have been seen as actively requesting clarification on that.
But yeah, the question is, why would you emphasise this specifically for Fe mobilising/Fi PoLR? This thread has other posts too where this is really emphasised and I don't see how it's specific to Fe mobilising. Any idea what differs here for Fe suggestive, specifically?