Particle physics, or any attempt to "objectively" conceive of the world, will break down at the barriers of perception. It's only natural; an infinite loop like everything else.
Personally I'm of the belief that every dimension of existence/experience is "reaching" into the next. Physical life forms as we think of them have 3-dimensional coherency/consistency and attempt to "reach" into the 4th dimension, which is the one we perceive ourselves most accutely as navigating. A fractal is kind of like a ray's equivalent of a human perceiving time; it's the dimension that their very existence suggests the necessity of (a ray exists in one dimension, but it travels in two), and it is through interaction with some being or entity or form of existence that is beyond itself that it comes to be projected into, rather than exist in as itself, the dimension above itself. Humanity's "fractal" is our sense of our evolution as a species, which, IMO, is the next step in the "evolution" or, more precisely, the progressive organization of matter. However, given that the brain is already in itself a quantum computer, we could very well accomplish this individually; hence the extant struggle between individuation and the collective will. Our collective unconscious is acutely aware of this divide, that a choice must be made to attempt progress in either one direction or the other (collective or individual) and I think it is the mission of our current psycho-social stage to decipher where our best bet lies. But perhaps this is the answer in itself? Or perhaps our extant failure should speak. I could go on.Dimension 1: Particle/ray. This is what most people consider the first dimension.. It is the first, but they forget zero typically. Anyway it's a particle/ray. I visualize it as just a dot with an energy tail. It's kind of like a photon. But it's peculiar in that it has both acceleratory and fractal properties. Like light again.
I find it interesting that you describe the ray as ; the dimensions seem to oscillate in their necessity of the "other" in terms of assigning their basic properties as energy in a limited environment vs. intertia in an unlimited one. Our dimension, the third (in traditional naming, obviously not in your model), is one of progressively greater inertia/collectivism, and the fourth seems quite clearly progressive rather than static.Light is a spiraling negative charge around a central positive charge (i.e. particle wave properties... in math these 2 properties correlate to the fibbonacci sequences, & are illustrated in sacred geometry's expanding rectangle & fractal spiral made with phi.. everyone has seen or should have seen diagrams of that. The fibbonacci sequence is actually the mathematical equivalent of light), and massless.
Viewing this from the perspective of the third eye- the eye is now watching itself. It realizes it has both an up and a down. To put it better, an expanding and fractal spiral. Imagine seeing yourself in a mirror, but the person in the mirror was also a person looking at you; and they believed you were infact the image in the mirror... That is what is happening in this dimension. That's why the dot has the energy tail. The energy tail is the separation of other and self, the dot is the other (and also the self) (in astrology this corresponds to aries, the sign of the self & the first sign in the zodiac).
Dimension 2: Line- a neverending line of particles. You could call it a stable frequency. The line consists of particles (those mentioned in D1); therefor the line itself is characterized by both a matter and energy state. This is just a frequency of light. I think most people know everything is just a frequency of light (you should know that anyway). This is where the name string in string theory comes from.
Dimension 3: Plane [...]
To be continued next time I'm high, coming down too much to continue
It's interesting, I think you can actually make analogies to Ne/Si vs. Se/Ni in this sense.