Any ideas about this guy's type?
Any ideas about this guy's type?
Last edited by silke; 07-26-2015 at 06:48 AM. Reason: updated links
Ne-ENTp. A good portion of his humor consists of "how can ridiculous point be explained in relation to everything else," then he goes off on some tangent creating a long string of intentionally bad reasoning.
i see art criticism mainly as Irrational>Rational pursuit.
I love this guy's humor so he may very well be an ENTp
I'd had similar vibes, because he's very opportunistic about pointing out flaws and inconsistencies in a plot or stories logic and then milking it for lolz. Seems to point to an Fe-HA with Ti and Ne.
He seems more ILE than LII because he isn't as stiff and goes with the flow of things a lot more, he doesn't really seem to genuinely care or be confused by the lack of logical consistency, but rather is just using it to opportunistic get lolz.
not sure of his type, leaning on SLI-Te ... he makes for awesome gifs tho
LII hands down. (IMO, lol)
He reminds me of a roommate I recently had who I had typed as LII. Great conversations together, but eventually (even with tons of stuff to talk about) the conversations would peter out and he would eventually become somewhat annoying and I just wished that he would leave the room. : D
With NC, I can see Fe suggestive / producing.
SLI-like relaxed irreverence.
ILE or IEE. I lean towards IEE because he gets way too personally offended in his reviews. He’s extremely annoying to me. Watch CinemaSins for actual Ti critique of movies.
Last edited by Blue; 01-12-2019 at 05:30 AM.
Insert word critic think xLI. Anyway this style of thinking relies on introverted irrationality. Possibly SLI.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Unfunny ILE. His background is really funny though.
His first job, how he writes jokes, the BTS drama of his godawful 5 hour long midnight specials, his power tripping and ripping off people who donated him 500k to make a garage set talk show lol
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
No shit. You really thought I meant CinemaSins give actual film critiques? No I mean they use actual Ti in their critiques, unlike Nostalgia Critic. I mean, what do people make of 16:00 in that video above where he talks about how he was offended about Twilight lecturing about abortion, as he says. Why would ILE care in this way?
Last edited by Blue; 01-12-2019 at 11:20 PM.
I've watched him since probably 2010/2011. He's the perfect archetype of an ILE, imo. ILE strong Ne subtype, enneagram 7w6 sx/so. His brother Rob is definitely an LII-Ne subtype. I think of Channel Awesome as "Alpha Quadra Central"
Nostalgia critic as a persona, he's close to IEE. The actual critic strikes me as a logical type but I don't see Ti... LSE makes more sense to me than SLI. His face doesn't have the Fe PoLR "set in stone" appeal.
This guy is SLI:
He's smiling, but his face is "set." It doesn't change expression. He says everything with the same expression. Gives off the impression of a person who's not ready to laugh or make merry.
Compare to Doug (NC is just a character)
I would type him as SLI too, but I see too much control in the way he moves and talks. He comes across as an extrovert, and he seems like he's trying too hard... Te base would make sense, with Ne HA, which is why he's able to portray a caricature of IEE. Delta is obvious. Alpha is waaay more easy going. I did some digging into the controversy surrounding his channel, and I can confidently say that ILE are a lot more easy going.
Delta extrovert, I think. His review is him stating facts about the movie and his opinion of it. There's very little objective analysis going on. At the same time, he's not nearly as diplomatic as I'd expect IEE to be.
CinemaSins is absolute garbage shit. Their criticisms are hollow. They artificially inflate their "sins counter" from selectively cutting footage, making nitpicky sins out of nothing, and their inability to follow films properly. I'm not sure if that is Ti or not, but that sort of deception is certainly infuriating.
Johari Box"Alpha Quadra subforum. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious." ~Obi-Wan Kenobi
I would say that CinemaSins would be more Te than Ti. The critique of errors are not really being put in relation to each other, they don't form an overarching perception. They're pointed out because they are errors. The sin is the error, not what the error does to the other elements.
CinemaSins works by infuriating people.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Ok, please confirm.
Here are some pictures of me.
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/showthread.php/47951-Unofficial-Members-Picture-Thread?p=1255640&viewfull=1#post1255640
Uups, I did it again... An off-topic post.
Nostalgia Critic started to really bug me with all his skits in the reviews, so I haven't seen his stuff in years. Idk, I think I prefer RLM's more dry and sardonic videos.
Cinemasins just reminds me of some annoying kid from high school. Not really offensive at all, just more like the human equivalent to a buzzing gnat.