Philosophy of Types (Gulenko)

[Absurd]

Hey, ******, learn the socionics definition of "sensory."

Hey you homosexual cunt, I don't give a shit about some definitions nor your feelings seeing you talk shit.

Awesome, you should specify substantiate your claims instead of letting your metaphorical dick flap limp in the wind. Or you could be content to look like an idiot. Either way is fine with me.

I'm so metaphorical as soldiers sin. Having said that, I'm going to wait till you, provide arguments(?) for you being this or that type, according to Gulenko's Cognitive Styles you love so much.

As for me disagreeing with it, you don't even know what I'm disagreeing with.

[Gilly]

Hey, ******, learn the socionics definition of "sensory."

Hey you homosexual cunt, I don't give a shit about some definitions nor your feelings seeing you talk shit.

You're really bad at this. You should go back to being the chatbox drunk.

I'm so metaphorical as soldiers sin. Having said that, I'm going to wait till you, provide arguments(?) for you being this or that type, according to Gulenko's Cognitive Styles you love so much.

Kind of hard to justify the cognitive styles as it's pretty much exclusively experiential...the Dialectical Algorithmic style fits me well because my thinking style mostly consists of balancing opposites, finding middle grounds and relative truths based on the relative strength of opposing internal dispositions; when I'm under stress it kind of feels like I'm walking a tight rope, trying to balance what's going on in my head. To me it feels like a constant balancing act of my own internal tendencies for the things that I consider good and evil, the things I consciously do to improve myself and the world and my ability to promote my own vision of how I think things should be vs. the evils I am compelled to do either by my own impulses that I struggle to control or by circumstance. Everything I do is weighed on these scales, every word that comes out of my mouth, every emotional signal I send, every action I take, and the final outcome, what comes out of me and goes into the world, is dependent on how the scales are balancing inside me.


For example, writing this right now, I am balancing whether or not I should respond, based on how little I care about your opinion and how little I am inclined to respond to your obvious petty bullshit; I balance this with how it would look to others and how it would affect my credibility if I just wrote you off and refused to exlpain myself and the fact that by my own principles I should treat you civilly to some extent even though you royally piss me off and I think you have little use or place in this forum, if not the world (assuming your real self resembles the one you present here, but that's not an assumption I feel safe making because it just might not be true).

If you want to look for examples of the dialectical "balancing act" in my writing I'm sure you could find them, but honestly I don't give a flying fuck about your opinion so you can go find them on your own.

As for me disagreeing with it, you don't even know what I'm disagreeing with.

What? You said that you think I'm a different "philosophy" type.

[Gilly]

lol ILIs are the "nihilist" type.

[Korpsy Knievel]

lol ILIs are the "nihilist" type.

That's only true if the following is taken to its logical extremes:

"I only know that I know nothing" - Socrates

The statement in itself is paradoxical and spoken for rhetorical effect, not to present a dogmatic view that knowledge is wholly inaccessible. Bear in mind, too, that like Diogenes of Sinope (essentially the Don Rickles of antiquity), Socrates was a very clever troll.

[Gilly]

lol ILIs are the "nihilist" type.

That's only true if the following is taken to its logical extremes:

"I only know that I know nothing" - Socrates

The statement in itself is paradoxical and spoken for rhetorical effect, not to present a dogmatic view that knowledge is wholly inaccessible. Bear in mind, too, that like Diogenes of Sinope (essentially the Don Rickles of antiquity), Socrates was a very clever troll.

I actually didn't mean to say nihilist; the word I was looking for was solipsist.

[Korpsy Knievel]

I actually didn't mean to say nihilist; the word I was looking for was solipsist.

In that case you'd better re-read Jung on introverted thinking or the works of various rationalists like Kant or Descartes. Posts by B&D or tcaud will also suffice.

[717495]

- Lyric (TE, IEI): the world is ruled mood state. The most volatile type of mentality, severely dependent on their internal attitude. Because of this, it is relatively easy to convince on any issue, to be quite persistent. But he just as easily and refuses to imposed beliefs.

I reacted negatively to these because they seem lacking and unbalanced, I feel like I got one of the crappier ones, yet this whole thing is highly true for me (people always mention my volatility, on the forum as well, and I pick up on the other half that my internal attitude just runs carefree with other's viewpoints as though bearing an unstable skepticism.) It can be a big problem when I just react negatively to other's thoughts and don't think things through enough, taking it all too personally. It helps to have some self-control and to dig deep.

[Gilly]

I actually didn't mean to say nihilist; the word I was looking for was solipsist.

In that case you'd better re-read Jung on introverted thinking or the works of various rationalists like Kant or Descartes. Posts by B&D or tcaud will also suffice.

lol BnD is IEI

[Absurd]

Don't want to be killjoy or something, but I hate Socrates.

[717495]

I assume the "...I know nothing" is a paradigm of their overall uncertain attitude in weighing information and making "rushed" decisions. That's at least part of the picture I get with ILI descriptions. The idea is pretty relateable however it seems like a more accurate reflection of Te-creative's ability to account for details and make workable sense of things, than it does just speculation.

[Absurd]

You're really bad at this. You should go back to being the chatbox drunk.

I'm always drunk seeing you post and I, actually, drink with real people Gilly.

Kind of hard to justify the cognitive styles as it's pretty much exclusively experiential...the Dialectical Algorithmic style fits me well because

And this is why you took the time to explain it to me after you dismissed me chatbox drunk. Go get some, I don't know, brain.

For fuck's sake, it's like reading this paedophile guy, Cat King Cole.

What? You said that you think I'm a different "philosophy" type.

I do.

[Gilly]

You're really bad at this. You should go back to being the chatbox drunk.

I'm always drunk seeing you post and I, actually, drink with real people Gilly.

Aww so cute, he thinks he's cool now.

And this is why you took the time to explain it to me after you dismissed me chatbox drunk. Go get some, I don't know, brain.

Well I had to do something to reconcile the fact that I really didn't want to respond, so I threw in a barb to make myself feel better about it. Scales gotta balance somehow.

For fuck's sake, it's like reading this paedophile guy, Cat King Cole.

blah blah blah

I do.

blah blah blah

[Absurd]

Aww so cute, he thinks he's cool now.

I'm never cool, I'm always hot. Too hot to handle.

[Gilly]

Aww so cute, he thinks he's cool now.

I'm never cool, I'm always hot. Too hot to handle.

Don't make me go Jim Morrison on you now.

[Absurd]

I'm never cool, I'm always hot. Too hot to handle.

Don't make me go Jim Morrison on you now.

Fire away, even though I don't know who Jim Morrison is.