Originally Posted by
chip
logical confusion
You are making a basic error here based on attempting to applying empirical consistency to an entirely non-empirical situation.
*waits of stone throwing*
An individual can either be rational or feminine. But they cannot be both at the same time. Learn to love it because otherwise you feed the feminine by attempting to enact 'change'. Just be stable and let them frolic.
Cases to Consider:
a) This is why when a woman is interested in you and continually approaches and you keep saying no they only become
more interested.
b) However if a woman says no to you and you run hot and then cold they will run very quickly because you are occupying their 'space' as it were.
c) If a woman says no and you just accept that without pushing the issue and then do whatever it is you are doing consistently and diligently within visible range of a woman they will be attracted to you. - Note, just leave them to make the 'change' move.
d) The problem: if you are ILI or SLI you will be in tune with asking
why they have changed and they will hate you for it and run away again. Inspection/observation can look suspiciously like 'challenge' and thus 'change' when it is merely an aspect of understanding.
In short, you must not change but provide them the space to do what they want without you having the right to question their motives. This is irrational and unfair: tough.