.
.
Last edited by mfckr; 12-25-2014 at 12:24 AM.
Hey Ashton, you know who this guy is ?
EDIT: I don't want to be a killjoy or something but this is a slippery topic. He had ties in England.
Last edited by Absurd; 07-23-2011 at 12:38 PM.
He is a model type. Therefore EIE. His Se HA drove him to seek blood.
D-SEI 9w1
This is me and my dual being scientific together
VI wise he seems Ti-ISTJ.
Nah, hes ego, probably without in the ego block.
Yes, ENFps can be serial murderers too, I mean look how naive and nice this guy looks, hes all bubbly and and emathetic in his expressions, yet look at what he did.
Join my Enneagram Discord: https://discord.gg/ND4jCAcs
Join my Enneagram Discord: https://discord.gg/ND4jCAcs
Te-ISTp
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
He appears to be SLE. Strange... I think there are a lot of things going on behind the courtain.
He talks about himself in his book: http://www.kevinislaughter.com/wp-co...dependence.pdf. From page 1376 onwards there's some sort of interview, he talks about his childhood, too.
He also put a video online: http://www.veoh.com/watch/v21123164bZCBQeZ8
He prepared everything in advance meticulously, including putting up information directed against the attempts to picture him differently than he is. Regarding his beliefs, he said that he made allegiance with Christianity and pan-European values based on pragmatism, to have appeal to as many Europeans as possible. He was previously pretty much involved in business and describes the evolution of his finances in detail. I have little doubts he is a Logical type, and likely Ti: among other things, he qualified his actions as a necessary evil.
Eww gross!Hobbies: Political analysis, studying new topics, Free Mason, Heraldry, Genealogy, gaming (MMO
or Modern Warfare 2)
ILI (FINAL ANSWER)
Ouch, that video is his justification? He should probably be punched in the dick. To death.
Moonlight will fall
Winter will end
Harvest will come
Your heart will mend
You're welcome. That was on his Wikipedia article, BTW, seems it gets updated as we speak .
I agree but I was referring to the way he puts the problem, how he sees the matter and his reasoning along the way. I think he is very precise and has a logical analysis on everything, adding a lot of rigor. He uses a strongly deductive reasoning and backs virtually every conclusion with premises. He tries to describe himself as objectively as possible, including flaws and the description of their causes (eg page 1401). Along the way he rejects humanism (1), all he speaks about comes from a purely technical though idealistic perspective: necessity, survival, prevention, etc. Calculated and systematic, kept track of everything, did all the stuff alone all the way. That book looks like a military manual, that was apparently a very tough job.
Regarding my personal relationship with God, I guess I’m not an excessively religious man. I am first and foremost a man of logic. However, I am a supporter of a monocultural Christian Europe.If you are not willing to sacrifice your own life, then I would strongly advise you to make babies and ensure that they will be willing to sacrifice theirs when the time is right.But sacrificing yourself for others who probably detest you for it doesn’t necessarily have to be a miserable experience. After all, we have the truth and logic on our side and we will learn to find rewards and comfort in our actions. After all, sometimes being uncompassionate is the most compassionate thing you can do.---"It's strange that he didn't kill himself, like the guys that have carried out school shootings," another police official said. [note: I've made this association at first, too, which normally corresponds to a feeler, but it's apparently not the case]
He said the attacks appeared to be the work of a lone madman, without links to any international terrorist networks. "He's obviously cold as ice." Police were interrogating the man at a police station in Oslo, saying the suspect is cooperating.
"He is clear on the point that he wants to explain himself," a police spokesman said.
(1) I can't wait for BBC to come out with psychanalytical "facts" about him.
Which personality type does he belong to? I somehow concluded at ESTJ, but this could be wrong.
Some of his written posts on the forums for World of Warcraft can be found here:
http://elitistjerks.com/f31/t16979-m...54/#post556603
http://elitistjerks.com/f31/t16979-m...40/#post674884
http://elitistjerks.com/f31/t24323-m...p7/#post721547
Leon
Yup, one can clearly see him talking about Moslems and their spell damage.
Wow, world of warcraft player loses it and kills 84 adolescents. Sue Blizzard!
I think INFp unfortunately
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
Actually Ive changed my mind, I think he is ego, the ineffable's post convinced me of that, Im also still convinced hes ego too, because he appearatly planned every detail of this attack for years. I would vote ENTp.
Join my Enneagram Discord: https://discord.gg/ND4jCAcs
Changed my mind
Thorough, methodical, fanatical, violent, self-justifying....ISTj?
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
ISTjs are not good at long term planning though, this guy made claims about doing precisely this since 2009.
Join my Enneagram Discord: https://discord.gg/ND4jCAcs
I am not one. I cant say for sure. But I would Imagine so. is related to planning as far as I understand it, even though ENTps tend to embark on adventures without thinking...idk maybe hes INTj then. I dont care anymore lol. Hes some creepy fucked weirdo - dont get me wrong Ashton's idea for posting this was good but I dont wanna think about this guy anymore.
Join my Enneagram Discord: https://discord.gg/ND4jCAcs
Rational is an absolute certainty.
Also, he favoured neither S or N strongly. He was both the debater and the plotter, and also the actor himself. But I would have to give the edge to sensory component.
The meticulousness by which he proceeded and the willingness to be alone while being outwardly superficially charismatic all suggest a powerful thinking component.
I think xSTj can be relied on.
Now I would slightly lean toward ESTj. I base this on his willingness to adopt different roles rapidly throughout his life. He was a normal kid first, then a worker out of the country, a leftist tag artist, suddenly a right wing nut, an agnostic, suddenly "moderately christian", then a freemason and a "templar".
ISTj-Tis, in my experience, tend toward consistency.
Also, he made himself a successful businessman I believe. Suggesting willingness to push forward in the long term and well, ability in business logic.
I had one of those 9/11 / John Kennedy types of moments with this piece of news.
I think there's worse to come.
First eliminate every possible source of error. Thence success is inevitable.
Well, the socionics stereotype for such a systematic killing says that beta rationals are where we should look.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
He was making cash knowing already he's going to do it, preparing, gathering materials for one purpose. People he has been discussing "things" with went apeshit after hearing what has he done, at least those on Stormfront.
I think you know how EDL took it.
I can say that he had a dream.
Last edited by Absurd; 07-24-2011 at 07:22 PM.
I wish propensity to evil not to be type related. I wish wish wish.
My motivation here is to try make as certain as possible that he's NOT ESTj which I can't rule out as of yet, so I'm hoping someone will "prove" me wrong here.
Thing is, ESTjs are also known as "good soldiers". I certainly wouldn't rule out an ESTj serial killer and frankly I think there have been several. ESTjs tend to approach things from the point of one-upping, proving that something that something can be done. It's like a game. Killing the other person might not be construed by the psyche even as violence if the other person is someone who "is supposed to die".
I certainly have no trouble cutting people open in the surgery room, which is violence for a good purpose.
I guess I'd like to find something else, but the violence, to prove this guy was Se.
The tagging thing might be one. That smacks of vandalism, disrespect for property. Also he does look more like an ISTj. Thing is, I'd like more proof.
First eliminate every possible source of error. Thence success is inevitable.
Cutting people open and making a bomb using way too much, let's call it, ingredients, is two different things.
The quote above about his relation to logic is certainly another point in favour of ISTj. And since I don't really particularly much hang out with them, maybe I'm making a mistake, maybe they do methodically try out different identities when looking for themselves. Anyhow I can't fully trust myself in this one since I'm too motivated to want to see him as ISTj. Bugger.
...
As for the other thing, I'd think bombing a building would be easier than cutting people open with a small knife. I certainly had trouble in the anatomy theatre dissections.
First eliminate every possible source of error. Thence success is inevitable.
Having read the beginning of his book, he strikes me as being -dominant. Based on VI, I'd say he's ISTj > INTj.
The maximum sentence for any crime in norway is 21 years. This guy is actually going to get out of jail in his early 50s. That astounds me.
Gee, do you think?
This is a classic case of consequentialism. High functioning at that. No Lelouch Lamperouge "sins of the world" pining here.
Almost like he's the yin to Julian Assange's yang.
He sure took the job seriously. Someone's been watching too many Danger Bros. cartoons.
Lol nobody wants him in their quadra.=p
Join my Enneagram Discord: https://discord.gg/ND4jCAcs
Do I think what -- that Norway's laws are as I described them, or that he will continue to pose a threat to society even after 21 years? As a matter of fact, I'm not sure about either -- I have no idea how imprisonment will affect a particular person, and it is possible that I read about the former from an unreliable source. Indeed, it is entirely possible that, in this instance, the criminal will find that he acted wrongly and repent his actions (cf. Raskolnikov).
That is not my impression; he seems to be quite romantic in his thought, as opposed to clear-minded. That is, he views himself as a "knight" (his word) whose duty is to sacrifice himself for the betterment of the world. The methods he employed are indeed consequentialist, but they are motivated by narcissistic delusions of grandeur. In other words, he valued fame and martyrdom more than actually achieving his goals.This is a classic case of consequentialism. High functioning at that. No Lelouch Lamperouge "sins of the world" pining here.
This is a not altogether inapt comparison, as Assange also suffers from pomposity and egomania, subsumed under an ideological mission.Almost like he's the yin to Julian Assange's yang.
In the Enneagram I would say he is a 1w9.
That isn't a nice thing to do. Shoving people out of "YOUR QUADRA" because they don't meet your expectations of not only your type or your close relations won't change who they are.
You're basically saying, "lets put all the bad humans in beta;" which isn't true. I've met more loving and kind LSI men in my life than my very own hard ass, rude, unkind, impolite, womenizing duals than ever in any quadra. Now chew on that!!!!
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 07-25-2011 at 06:27 AM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Yeah, this is really messed up. Especially noted in other deltas on here, just refusing for anyone to be in their quadra for no good reason, which they dislike by some piece of moral code that has nothing to do with type. Often times they can't look at the person as a real-time individual anymore, they obsess over general ideas and stereotypes.
I did say I VI Breivik Ti-ISTJ. Investigating more of his background, this sounds right.