Cutting people open and making a bomb using way too much, let's call it, ingredients, is two different things.
Cutting people open and making a bomb using way too much, let's call it, ingredients, is two different things.
The quote above about his relation to logic is certainly another point in favour of ISTj. And since I don't really particularly much hang out with them, maybe I'm making a mistake, maybe they do methodically try out different identities when looking for themselves. Anyhow I can't fully trust myself in this one since I'm too motivated to want to see him as ISTj. Bugger.
...
As for the other thing, I'd think bombing a building would be easier than cutting people open with a small knife. I certainly had trouble in the anatomy theatre dissections.
First eliminate every possible source of error. Thence success is inevitable.
Having read the beginning of his book, he strikes me as being-dominant. Based on VI, I'd say he's ISTj > INTj.
The maximum sentence for any crime in norway is 21 years. This guy is actually going to get out of jail in his early 50s. That astounds me.
Notwithstanding the maximum initial sentence of 21 years, criminals can be detained for longer periods of time if it is determined that they pose a continuing threat to society.Originally Posted by crazedratsshadow
Gee, do you think?Notwithstanding the maximum initial sentence of 21 years, criminals can be detained for longer periods of time if it is determined that they pose a continuing threat to society.
This is a classic case of consequentialism. High functioning at that. No Lelouch Lamperouge "sins of the world" pining here.
Almost like he's the yin to Julian Assange's yang.
He sure took the job seriously. Someone's been watching too many Danger Bros. cartoons.
Lol nobody wants him in their quadra.=p
Join my Enneagram Discord: https://discord.gg/ND4jCAcs
In the Enneagram I would say he is a 1w9.
Do I think what -- that Norway's laws are as I described them, or that he will continue to pose a threat to society even after 21 years? As a matter of fact, I'm not sure about either -- I have no idea how imprisonment will affect a particular person, and it is possible that I read about the former from an unreliable source. Indeed, it is entirely possible that, in this instance, the criminal will find that he acted wrongly and repent his actions (cf. Raskolnikov).
That is not my impression; he seems to be quite romantic in his thought, as opposed to clear-minded. That is, he views himself as a "knight" (his word) whose duty is to sacrifice himself for the betterment of the world. The methods he employed are indeed consequentialist, but they are motivated by narcissistic delusions of grandeur. In other words, he valued fame and martyrdom more than actually achieving his goals.This is a classic case of consequentialism. High functioning at that. No Lelouch Lamperouge "sins of the world" pining here.
This is a not altogether inapt comparison, as Assange also suffers from pomposity and egomania, subsumed under an ideological mission.Almost like he's the yin to Julian Assange's yang.
Yeah I looked up everything I could on him as soon as I saw the news. Fucking disgusting, why kill healthy, innocent teens to prove a point? Idk why that pisses me off the most. Go after old farts who you think fucked your country over if you must. 98 killed and only MAXIMUM 21 years . thats disgusting. Copy cats will follow suit. I want to torture him myself. slowly.
world of warcraft drives man insane, mows down 100+ children with automatic weapons. blizzard has done it again
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote