Yup, one can clearly see him talking about Moslems and their spell damage.
Yup, one can clearly see him talking about Moslems and their spell damage.
Wow, world of warcraft player loses it and kills 84 adolescents. Sue Blizzard!
I think INFp unfortunately
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
Actually Ive changed my mind, I think he isego, the ineffable's post convinced me of that, Im also still convinced hes
ego too, because he appearatly planned every detail of this attack for years. I would vote ENTp.
Join my Enneagram Discord: https://discord.gg/ND4jCAcs
Changed my mind
Thorough, methodical, fanatical, violent, self-justifying....ISTj?
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp![]()
DCNH: Dominant![]()
--> perhaps Normalizing
![]()
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
ISTjs are not good at long term planning though, this guy made claims about doing precisely this since 2009.
Join my Enneagram Discord: https://discord.gg/ND4jCAcs
Rational is an absolute certainty.
Also, he favoured neither S or N strongly. He was both the debater and the plotter, and also the actor himself. But I would have to give the edge to sensory component.
The meticulousness by which he proceeded and the willingness to be alone while being outwardly superficially charismatic all suggest a powerful thinking component.
I think xSTj can be relied on.
Now I would slightly lean toward ESTj. I base this on his willingness to adopt different roles rapidly throughout his life. He was a normal kid first, then a worker out of the country, a leftist tag artist, suddenly a right wing nut, an agnostic, suddenly "moderately christian", then a freemason and a "templar".
ISTj-Tis, in my experience, tend toward consistency.
Also, he made himself a successful businessman I believe. Suggesting willingness to push forward in the long term and well, ability in business logic.
I had one of those 9/11 / John Kennedy types of moments with this piece of news.
I think there's worse to come.
First eliminate every possible source of error. Thence success is inevitable.
Well, the socionics stereotype for such a systematic killing says that beta rationals are where we should look.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit