i wouldn't spend a second on a forum like this if there wasn't some extent to which i had found the phenomenon this theory describes manifests in reality. why the hell are you people even here.
i think some people are confusing the issue of whether the phenomenon is perfectly well described in all of it's nuances with the issue of whether anything about it is real. yes to the second, no and duh to the first.
there's a bunch of people on this forum who have a
schizofrenic attitude toward socionics. on one hand they spend hour upon hour, year upon year discussing, writing about and thinking about the theory. on the other when the opportunity to write skeptical remarks about it supposedly being a delusion or pseudoscience arrives they jump on the chance. sorry, but your actions mark a stronger commitment than your words in this regard. you can't just erase the obvious fact that you think this theory has merit just by writing a dismissive paragraph for once.
Not at all, it's not tangible.
wrong. tangibility is not a criterion for reality.