LSE type.
LSE type.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Hemoglobin is my aunt on facebook and I'm her makeup doll.
언제나.
What relation do you have with moredhel?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Originally Posted by octopuslove
I see Se-valuing, but not really Se-dominant. Se-HA, I think.
I agree with HunterX, except I have no opinion on subtype.
You want quotes? Okey-dokes.
Se-valuing
(this is Se-HA>>>Se-ego)
(some people might see that as Te-valuing, but I think it's just Se/Ni ambition)
You're too aristocratic to be Gamma I think. You naturally judge people and put them in categories.
This is beta>>>gamma behaviour
This is EIE >> SLE
This sounds a bit Ni>Se-ego, but it could just be depression:
This sounds Ni>Se too, or at least not Ni-DS:
And SLEs are Si-ignoring, but still quite hedonistic, so this sounds EIE>SLE.
This could be Te-valuing, but everything else screams beta:
And this could also be Te-valuing, but it just sounds like control-freak to me (Se-HA or E8) and it's aristocratic as fuck.
I can't stand whiners. Or lazy bums when it comes to the job. Listen to my plan, don't whine that it can't work or be pessimistic about it because it gets on my nerves. Offer something constructive if you want to do well in solving the problem, or get ignored entirely. I can't do anything about lazy bums. Those people shouldn't even come to class.Why do you want to know?! xDDDDD
언제나.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
wat
why Fi? o.o What is that Fi standing for?
언제나.
I don't appreciate joking around; I am a serious type. Answer my question. You're on a Socionics site; if you don't know what it is by now then there are many sites where you may access the information.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
because it's purple, duh!
as for type I agree Ni-ego > Se-ego for you but I'd go with gamma values over beta values - Te-LIE most likely
see which quadra values sound more like you, beta or gamma: http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.php?title=Quadras
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote