Oh, the "you" wasn't referring to you directly; it was kind of a generalized "you"Originally Posted by Director Abbie
You tried to tell me a bunch of things about how I interact with IEIs and LIIs, and it's not true. I work well with my LII brother and I have very little in common with IEIs. My conversations with my LII brother are informative, and my conversations with my IEI coworker irritated her.
My ESE cousin irritates me more than my SLE friend.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
So now you're generalizing me? Please define "you" for future reference regarding your posts.
No. There's a misunderstanding here. Let's change "you" to "one person"So now you're generalizing me? Please define "you" for future reference regarding your posts.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Super-ego conflict. LOL.No. There's a misunderstanding here. Let's change "you" to "one person"
P.S. Maritsa, do you still think I'm LSI?
Change her to three persons, it is less confusing this way.No. There's a misunderstanding here. Let's change "you" to "one person"
lolSo now you're generalizing me? Please define "you" for future reference regarding your posts.
DA, do you seriously not understand her use of the word "you" or are you just being difficult for fun?
and Maritsa, although I do think illusionary has problems, I can't see how it would be worse than conflictor. I love my illusionaries -- I have a couple close friends who are ILE. I have zero close friends who are LSE. I think they avoid me.
IEI-Fe 4w3
agree with this. actually the model A explains illusionary quite well. you connect really well on half the levels and disconnect on the other half. so if you decide to pay attention to the connecting half, the relationship is a good one!DA, do you seriously not understand her use of the word "you" or are you just being difficult for fun?
and Maritsa, although I do think illusionary has problems, I can't see how it would be worse than conflictor. I love my illusionaries -- I have a couple close friends who are ILE. I have zero close friends who are LSE. I think they avoid me.
ILE
those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often
Neither and/or both.DA, do you seriously not understand her use of the word "you" or are you just being difficult for fun?
I take things as they are said, not as they are meant, and it's pretty offensive for someone to tell you what your relationships are like when they don't know you and are wrong.
IEI-Fe 4w3
I like activation, duality and mirror most.
Btw calm down Abbie
I understand and somewhat agreeNeither and/or both.
I take things as they are said, not as they are meant, and it's pretty offensive for someone to tell you what your relationships are like when they don't know you and are wrong.
p . . . a . . . n . . . d . . . o . . . r . . . a
trad metalz | (more coming)
can't you people cut some slack. does everyone have to be perfectly specific and correct in their speech all the time???I understand and somewhat agree
And, I don't think Maritsa was slinging the word "you" around carelessly, in this instance. "You" is commonly used to mean "the person in question". WORK HARDER to understand WHAT IS MEANT, not only the specific words a person says. Sure it's their responsibility to communicate to the best of their ability but it's TO YOUR BENEFIT to try to see around little errors, inconsistencies and slip-ups (if they even exist and in this case they do not) for the higher goal of mutual understanding.
I don't know why this really got my goat, but it did. I feel like too many people on this forum PICK ON Maritsa. Sometimes she deserves it but usually, she does not. Stop it.
That said, I like you, woofwoofl, and Abbie, you know I like you too!
IEI-Fe 4w3
can't you people cut some slack. does everyone have to be perfectly specific and correct in their speech all the time???I understand and somewhat agree
And, I don't think Maritsa was slinging the word "you" around carelessly, in this instance. "You" is commonly used to mean "the person in question". WORK HARDER to understand WHAT IS MEANT, not only the specific words a person says. Sure it's their responsibility to communicate to the best of their ability but it's TO YOUR BENEFIT to try to see around little errors, inconsistencies and slip-ups (if they even exist and in this case they do not) for the higher goal of mutual understanding.
I don't know why this really got my goat, but it did. I feel like too many people on this forum PICK ON Maritsa. Sometimes she deserves it but usually, she does not. Stop it.
That said, I like you, woofwoofl, and Abbie, you know I like you too!
I like you too, and I like Maritsa, and I like Director Abbie, and I don't want any of you to feel thumped on by me
I agree with the overall message of this; it still feels rotten to get hit by a wild pronoun though, and I hope I haven't been responsible for doing that too much myself...
p . . . a . . . n . . . d . . . o . . . r . . . a
trad metalz | (more coming)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote