I vote for SLI.
I vote for SLI.
SEE
Do you people seriously like to talk about stupid and useless hypotheses for caricatures ? Does this shit amuse you for real ? How about "Which individuals are most likely to fail at life?"
SLI is obsessed with saving people. This makes them the most heroic.
response is quite reactive without stopping to think before they act. I wouldn't call that heroic. But, on the other hand, it was my father, SLI, who saved me from near drowning accident when I was 19 because of this quick heroic response. Yeah, I guess that would make them good, on the scene, respondents, hence fire fighters. But, they can also be impulsive and get themselves into fights that they can't estimate the damages to before they act/react, causing a lot of undue physical harm to themselves.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
This is not true. While they are perhaps the most inclined to take action and save people - "the firefighter doing his job" stereotype - they are certainly not "obsessed" by it. The way you put it sounds like an attitude Betas are prone to - looking forward for heroic deeds, craving for it. Neither Socionics says that, not I know SLIs IRL having such inclinations, in fact some I know expressed disgust for eager hero wannabes. They don't find ethical to look forward for catastrophes merely to boost your ego. They are modest and after doing some heroic shit they reply like "it was the right thing to do", "I just did my duty/job", "it was necessary", etc. They draw motivation out of necessity, they are interested in the practical, heroic idealism is one of the last things they're interested in, as far as I can tell.
Well if you consider our imperialistic american military heroic I have to go with Delta STs.
Lol at you seemingly taking me seriously.
First of all. The information gained here would most likely to come to the conclusion that oh lawl we have subjective criteria about which types are most likely to be thought to be heroic based on what brainfarts the individuals come with. Which are to some extent influenced by quandra values, as the individual identifies with certain quandra just makes it more likely. But other than that i find it extremely too subjective as its obvious that any type can behave within whatever criteria that someone thinks is worth calling heroic. Usually stemmed by some virtue that the individual projects as worthy of having. But of course you know this.
The comment about which individuals most likely to fail at life was mostly sarcastic and i didnt think about it in serious manner there is no way i would find that interesting either. It was mostly just expression of annoyment from the view that stemms from upper writing.
Im creep of a beast btw and i wondered upon as you introduced me to the nakshatra system and since then i have found it immensely helpful. I have been wondering, why do you think the system works ? Its almost magical.
I cant even explain how it works, it just does. It amazes me too
I'm going to take a wild guess and say that there are heroic people of all types and no one type is more heroic than the others.
It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. It's what you know for sure that just ain't so.-Mark Twain
You can't wake a person who is pretending to be asleep.
SEE, SLI, a reformed SLE, and an IEI with signs from God.
LII-IEI's
What? Oh, MBTI guy.
But yeah, I definitely say SEE, and yes it depends, any type could be a hero, but SEE Russell Crowe is the badass Gladiator who has a really hearty down-to-earthness, wisdom, depth of feeling. I see something very heroic in some SEEs, just how they're oriented to thrive in direct reality, and have a solid maturity, confidence, inner and outer strength and work ethic, esp. when older. I get the same feeling when I watch other SEEs like Mickey Rourke and Johnny Knoxville, even if it doesn't compute to external codes of conduct. It's the inner naturalness of filling their body and seeing everything they need to see in the moment that makes it more real for me. Not all of them can take that SeFi power and harness it wisely like a true hero.
thanks - and yep, if something needs done, I have a way of just doing it... hell, the last time I went shopping for food at Buehler's, I cleaned up all the carts out of the parking lot for everyone there - how are cars supposed to go nice and fast in the parking lot with those carts littered everywhere?
Last edited by woofwoofl; 06-21-2011 at 06:16 AM. Reason: poli was being awesome again and I had to quote all the new stuff too :)
p . . . a . . . n . . . d . . . o . . . r . . . a
trad metalz | (more coming)
Have I ever told you how much I love you?Originally Posted by crazedratsshadow
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...