Based on the movie. Not taking the comicbook into consideration.
Charles Xavier: Ne-ENFp
Erik Lehnsherr / Magneto: Se-ISTj
Sebastian Shaw: Ti-ENTp
Moira MacTaggert: Te-ISTp
Raven / Mystique: Fe-INFp
Emma Frost: Ti-ISTj
Hank McCoy / Beast: Ne-INTj
Based on the movie. Not taking the comicbook into consideration.
Charles Xavier: Ne-ENFp
Erik Lehnsherr / Magneto: Se-ISTj
Sebastian Shaw: Ti-ENTp
Moira MacTaggert: Te-ISTp
Raven / Mystique: Fe-INFp
Emma Frost: Ti-ISTj
Hank McCoy / Beast: Ne-INTj
Charles in this movie seems like a quintessential INFj.
I'm not very set on any types but here's my list:
Charles Xavier: EII>IEE=EIE
Erik Lehnsherr / Magneto: LSI
Sebastian Shaw: No opinion
Moira MacTaggert: No opinion
Raven / Mystique: IEI=SEI
Emma Frost: ESI=LSI
Hank McCoy / Beast: LII
“No psychologist should pretend to understand what he does not understand... Only fools and charlatans know everything and understand nothing.” -Anton Chekhov
http://kevan.org/johari?name=Bardia0
http://kevan.org/nohari?name=Bardia0
It was the best one out of the X-Men instalment, imo.
INFj seems probable as well. The relationship between Xavier and Magneto is such that they got along pretty well and initially had a positive working relationship in terms of their goal to gather all the mutants to protect and bring out the potential in them.
I think so too. Was debating between ESI and EII, but near the end the Ne>Se was rather obvious
others...
Erik Lehnsherr / Magneto- Ne PoLR?
Sebastian Shaw- EIE
Alex Summers / Havok- LSE?
Sean Cassidy / Banshee- Alpha Ti?
Angel Salvadore- Se/Ni introvert?
Emma Frost- LSI>robot
Hank McCoy / Beast- LII?
EII INFj
Forum status: retired
Considering the relationships and the history, can someone explain why Magneto is chosen as an LSI?
Ceci n'est pas une eii.
Magnito - ISTp
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Do fictional characters need to make Socionics sense though?
Not that I think he's definitely Ne PoLR (Se/Ni at the very least); I slightly leaned towards ESI while watching it since I felt he and Charles did seem to share a lot of similarities, and I sensed that Erik was more motivated by vengeance more than a grande ideology (the latter progressed later, which made me question Beta)
I'll have to watch it again to pick up on things...
EII INFj
Forum status: retired
I just saw this. The original was way better in my opinion. Better acting, filming, style, plot, etc. It's typical for things these days to have higher public approval though, ie. "Inception," which wasn't a bad movie, but certainly not an 8.9/10. Hype, hype, hype.
Edit: but as far as the OP typings, I tend to agree. Not completely sure about Magneto but Beta sounds right.
He did seem more extroverted, imo.
Last edited by 717495; 06-20-2011 at 10:53 AM.
Based on X-Men First Class, Days of Future Past, and Apocalpyse(and also X1, X2, and The Last Stand)
Charles Xavier/Professor X: EIE-Ni?
Erik Lehnsherr/Magneto: ILI-Te
@Olimpia
Hank McCoy reminds me of my younger self, tbh... not the Beast part of course.
@chocobojohnx7
Thank you for assigning typing tasks to the people in this forum, without your requests there was an imminent threat of running out of activity
EIE-Ni seems a good choice to me for Professor X
Xavier EII, Eric ESI. Fi+ and Fi- difference