Results 1 to 40 of 2611

Thread: Gamma Examples

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    TIM
    ILI - H/C 4w5 sp/sx
    Posts
    673
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by one View Post
    I actually thought SEEs would have more expressive faces considering they are Ethicals.

    Those videos and her other videos are cancer
    You talk about my post? Yes I'm pretty sure that girl is an SEE (creative sub?), Se lead is obvious and no Fe value since she doesn't give a shit about the atmosphere and just say whatever she want to say

    Last edited by Tarnished; 03-13-2021 at 03:15 PM.

  2. #2
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Moharu View Post
    You talk about my post? Yes I'm pretty sure that girl is an SEE (creative sub?), Se lead is obvious and no Fe value since she doesn't give a shit about the atmosphere and just say whatever she want to say


    I don't know anything about her and I only watched a minute but some of her facial expressions reminded me of some EIE's I have typed. I might be totally wrong but I just wanted to mention it because my intuitive reaction was quite strong. can't really watch more because she's so in your face extroverted and I don't really like that.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Apr 2018
    Posts
    2,184
    Mentioned
    58 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Moharu View Post
    You talk about my post? Yes I'm pretty sure that girl is an SEE (creative sub?), Se lead is obvious and no Fe value since she doesn't give a shit about the atmosphere and just say whatever she want to say

    So, she hanging out with a ISFp male?

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    TIM
    ILI - H/C 4w5 sp/sx
    Posts
    673
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by timber View Post
    So, she hanging out with a ISFp male?
    As far as I known, they are not in relationship, just live in the same house. I'm not sure about the guy's type, but he's cute.

  5. #5
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by timber View Post
    So, she hanging out with a ISFp male?
    I think you might be right, he has that typical dumas face. so supervision at first glance I guess. the guy looks like he will have massive health problems in 10 years.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •