Gamma Examples

[Adam Strange]

Thanks for the reply. I do not ask questions so often.
Taking into account the additional data ESI seems as correct.

If I'd saw only that clip I'd could did not suppose ESI for her. She's very cute as should on 2nd and gives close to terrible impressions from the posted clip. I even had doubts it's the same girl! It's so interesting situation, so I wanted to know how other possible Te perceives her. She discusses there a conflict with someone and probably made the video being in rather nervous state, - in which one I do not see ESI in common - they are quiet and restrained people. I saw when ESI were rude in moments [it's better to ignore when they are such. as being sensitive on the opposing they'll feel insulted and will become worse. if to stay polite with them in those moments - they quickly turn to white&fluffy state], but not so loud and weird.

> As for how I react to her, I think she is much too heavy for me to consider.

On 2nd clip she mb in more natural state to consider. She's ESI. Seems sx what you prefer. As you relate yourself to E8 so her possible E8 may fit your taste too. About type's accentuation mb said that her ethics is more flexible than I'd expect from Fi accented type. In sum, it's mb an examle of girls you are seeking for, if to assume the duality and exclude nontypes factors which may influence significantly (as the nonverbal is strange in one of the clips).

Thanks, @Sol. I do seem to like sx-first women, but I tend to have longer relationships with sp-first women. Two sx-firsts seem to have lots of great sex but still seem to have attachment issues. I'm looking for an sp/sx, and either an e6 or an e9 ESI.

On a two sx/so couple, Amber said: Sx first is the most compatible .... to such an extent that a relationship with an Sx often proves superior to one that should be mana-from-the-sky socionically.
Sx/so is incredibly compatible, but there's lots of tension as well due to a form of "total commitment anxiety". You feel the Sx pull that wants to merge and give it all, but at the same time Sx/so has to feel free to be safe. If you let them be, they come to you. If you make them jealous, they can be like puppies. If you make claims, you risk losing them.

> You get the idea.

The photos show you prefer thin figure. Their types and other personal traits by photos, especially without good seen face, is hard to suppose. Except: 3 - mb EII, 4 - T.

Since you seem to have saved the pictures, I can tell you what types they are. I know all these women very well.
#1. SLI-Te
#2. ESI-Se
#3. ESI-Fi
#4. LII
#5. LSI-Ti

> In any case, I don't get feelings of "personal sympathy and irrational trust" from her.

I may link on more her materials if you'll want.

Please do. Thanks.

> Now, of course, you could say I am not LIE.

I see the possibilities for different types. There is no video. Also IR test can help, with some chance. Not a single case, as IR effects is more correctly to take into account in the comparision of groups of people.
In my own perception I feel the sympathy on 2nd clip only.

> I think this woman doesn't evoke that feeling in me because I won't allow myself to feel anything toward her.

IR related sympathy should be out of will control. You see a smile and notice it's cute or bad. People may allow or supress the development into deeper feelings.

Most often, yes, the feelings are out of my control. However, if a woman is far from my Imago, then I don't try to get close at all.

> The woman in the video does remind me of this female ESI whom I'm considering asking out.

by the photo seems F. not sure in other traits
they have the similarity in the look. types may differ

> If I do, she'll be the heaviest woman I've ever dated. But I haven't asked her yet and I'm not sure she'd even consider me.

it needs a practice to check when types differ much like, for example, duals - it's possible to get an adoption step. in bad IR people have no sympathy enough to adopt, opposite to good IR

Yes, we'll have to see how things go. The woman in the picture is very smart and appears to be similar to the woman in picture #3, but she looks a bit too passive for me. IDK, we'll have to see.

[Sol]

Since you seem to have saved the pictures, I can tell you what types they are.

I remember them and may to look again with a browser's history.
Nice to see some matches.

> Please do. Thanks.

pm'd

> but she looks a bit too passive for me

Se types should not give an impression of being passive. higher chance of N-I

P.S. before pm I've looked only at the part where asked about the interest in the additional info about her