Page 38 of 56 FirstFirst ... 2834353637383940414248 ... LastLast
Results 1,481 to 1,520 of 2611

Thread: Gamma Examples

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    TIM
    ILI - H/C 4w5 sp/sx
    Posts
    673
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default




    Not a real perrson, but Jesse is an ESFp?

  2. #2
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Megan Thee Stallion - SEE



    50 Cent - SEE
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  3. #3
    I don't play, I slay. Lolita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Near Whole Foods
    TIM
    SEE-N™ WPEL™ 863
    Posts
    1,146
    Mentioned
    85 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Megan is mos def SEE with her “real Hot Girl shit” but thought from a distance that 50Cent is SLE. Then I watched his interviews, and yeah, he’s SEE He’s pretty funny.



  4. #4
    I don't play, I slay. Lolita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Near Whole Foods
    TIM
    SEE-N™ WPEL™ 863
    Posts
    1,146
    Mentioned
    85 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    This is ILI singing about their SEE dual. I think Mayer Hawthorne is actually an ILI.

  5. #5
    I don't play, I slay. Lolita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Near Whole Foods
    TIM
    SEE-N™ WPEL™ 863
    Posts
    1,146
    Mentioned
    85 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    The actress who played Joi is also SEE, probably N subtype. She said her roles are really her. She’s the original Hoochie Mama


  6. #6
    I don't play, I slay. Lolita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Near Whole Foods
    TIM
    SEE-N™ WPEL™ 863
    Posts
    1,146
    Mentioned
    85 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Joi SEE. Note: she’s accusing her boyfriend of cheating on her but she’s got some dude in her bed



    The snippy attitude is the Fi.

  7. #7
    I don't play, I slay. Lolita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Near Whole Foods
    TIM
    SEE-N™ WPEL™ 863
    Posts
    1,146
    Mentioned
    85 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Amy March SEE-N
    Teddy SEE-H

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    2,115
    Mentioned
    108 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lolita View Post
    Amy March SEE-N
    Teddy SEE-H
    Yeah. Good one. Amy's usually typed SEE in the book and in earlier movies; for this most recent movie she's rewritten with some LIE-ish traits. Personality Database voters agree: https://www.personality-database.com...rsonality-type


    Laurie is most often typed ESI and IEI from what I can see, but I'm not sure, given he seemed 7w6 ish in the book (and that's how personality database voters have him down), and that is often an outgoing type. Could be SEE.

  9. #9
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    2,115
    Mentioned
    108 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    Someone on the forum said they thought I was N subtype, if IRC. I'm not sure, but this will be good for me to dig into.

  11. #11
    I don't play, I slay. Lolita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Near Whole Foods
    TIM
    SEE-N™ WPEL™ 863
    Posts
    1,146
    Mentioned
    85 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    John Fogerty SEE-N



  12. #12
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    stephen hawking - ILI
    robert oppenheimer - ILI

    watched a couple of interviews in the last 2 hours. was really enjoyable. I especially liked this one

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xSG_G5CVVlM
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  13. #13

    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    TIM
    ILI - H/C 4w5 sp/sx
    Posts
    673
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEW8c5MQ7io



    Gatts (the big guy) is ISFj?, Griffith (white hair) is ENTj. Dual isn't it?

    They are not gay but... they are soooo gayyyy.

  14. #14

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    2,115
    Mentioned
    108 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Moharu View Post
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zEW8c5MQ7io



    Gatts (the big guy) is ISFj?, Griffith (white hair) is ENTj. Dual isn't it?

    They are not gay but... they are soooo gayyyy.
    A) I'd pick that dude next to me over someone who talks like a confused 2 year old. Why are virtually all women anime characters voiced by concussed dolphins with agoraphobia?

    B) The duality between the dudes is exquisiiiiite. Sign me up.

  15. #15
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  16. #16

  17. #17
    I don't play, I slay. Lolita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Near Whole Foods
    TIM
    SEE-N™ WPEL™ 863
    Posts
    1,146
    Mentioned
    85 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Ciara SEE-H



  18. #18
    Northstar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    TIM
    SLE-C (ISTP)
    Posts
    2,241
    Mentioned
    248 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Max Planck - ILI




  19. #19
    Haikus SGF's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Location
    ┌П┐(ಠ_ಠ)
    TIM
    LSI-H™
    Posts
    2,165
    Mentioned
    181 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Northstar View Post
    Max Planck - ILI[/IMG]
    Not even his suit sits well on him. Narrow shoulders.. Looks like ILI yeah.

  20. #20
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Northstar View Post
    Max Planck - ILI
    I remember watching this video one or two years ago to figure out his type but while I did think he was an Ni dom I couldn't really figure out if he was ILI or an IEI with a normalising subtype.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5mwHXBn6mcM

    ILI probably makes more sense overall. I just wish there was more footage to analyse.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  21. #21
    Northstar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    TIM
    SLE-C (ISTP)
    Posts
    2,241
    Mentioned
    248 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    I remember watching this video one or two years ago to figure out his type but while I did think he was an Ni dom I couldn't really figure out if he was ILI or an IEI with a normalising subtype.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5mwHXBn6mcM

    ILI probably makes more sense overall. I just wish there was more footage to analyse.
    Not to insult the intelligence of IEI but considering the scope of his contributions to physics it's a fair bet he was a logical type.

    His views on religion (found on wikipedia) were interesting and fitting of Ni dom, I can respect them and wouldn't fundamentally disagree:

    In his 1937 lecture "Religion and Naturwissenschaft", Planck expressed the view that God is everywhere present, and held that "the holiness of the unintelligible Godhead is conveyed by the holiness of symbols." Atheists, he thought, attach too much importance to what are merely symbols. He was a churchwarden from 1920 until his death, and believed in an almighty, all-knowing, beneficent God (though not necessarily a personal one). Both science and religion wage a "tireless battle against skepticism and dogmatism, against unbelief and superstition" with the goal "toward God!"[40] Planck said in 1944, "As a man who has devoted his whole life to the most clear headed science, to the study of matter, I can tell you as a result of my research about atoms this much: There is no matter as such. All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent spirit (orig. geist). This spirit is the matrix of all matter."[41]

  22. #22
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    16,852
    Mentioned
    1604 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Northstar View Post
    Not to insult the intelligence of IEI but considering the scope of his contributions to physics it's a fair bet he was a logical type.

    His views on religion (found on wikipedia) were interesting and fitting of Ni dom, I can respect them and wouldn't fundamentally disagree:

    In his 1937 lecture "Religion and Naturwissenschaft", Planck expressed the view that God is everywhere present, and held that "the holiness of the unintelligible Godhead is conveyed by the holiness of symbols." Atheists, he thought, attach too much importance to what are merely symbols. He was a churchwarden from 1920 until his death, and believed in an almighty, all-knowing, beneficent God (though not necessarily a personal one). Both science and religion wage a "tireless battle against skepticism and dogmatism, against unbelief and superstition" with the goal "toward God!"[40] Planck said in 1944, "As a man who has devoted his whole life to the most clear headed science, to the study of matter, I can tell you as a result of my research about atoms this much: There is no matter as such. All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particle of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent spirit (orig. geist). This spirit is the matrix of all matter."[41]
    I agree with the assertion that Max Planck was a Gamma, but he VI's ESI. https://physicsworld.com/a/max-planc...revolutionary/

    For what it's worth, I know two ESI's with PhD's in Physics and two with Masters degrees. One of the guys (he's a good friend of mine) looks almost exactly like Planck's picture in the following link, or he will in a few decades. The expressions are exactly the same: https://www.sapaviva.com/max-planck/

  23. #23
    Northstar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2020
    TIM
    SLE-C (ISTP)
    Posts
    2,241
    Mentioned
    248 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Strange View Post
    I agree with the assertion that Max Planck was a Gamma, but he VI's ESI. https://physicsworld.com/a/max-planc...revolutionary/

    For what it's worth, I know two ESI's with PhD's in Physics and two with Masters degrees. One of the guys (he's a good friend of mine) looks almost exactly like Planck's picture in the following link, or he will in a few decades. The eyes are exactly the same: https://www.sapaviva.com/max-planck/
    To be fair, almost anyone can work their way to degrees (yes, even PhD, it's just grueling work), but I find it hard to believe a type with 1-2D intuitive and 1-2D logic functions would have revolutionarized subatomic physics.

  24. #24
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Adam Strange View Post
    I agree with the assertion that Max Planck was a Gamma, but he VI's ESI. https://physicsworld.com/a/max-planc...revolutionary/

    For what it's worth, I know two ESI's with PhD's in Physics and two with Masters degrees. One of the guys (he's a good friend of mine) looks almost exactly like Planck's picture in the following link, or he will in a few decades. The expressions are exactly the same: https://www.sapaviva.com/max-planck/
    I really feel like you type every person as an ESI. must be a nice world to see everyone as your dual.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  25. #25

    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Germany
    TIM
    LIE
    Posts
    722
    Mentioned
    48 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Raymond Thiry, the Dutch actor, is an ESI

    Probably of Se subtype.











    Attached Images Attached Images

  26. #26
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zero View Post
    Raymond Thiry, the Dutch actor, is an ESI

    he visually reminds me of zinedine zidane, who I have typed as ESI-D.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  27. #27

    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Germany
    TIM
    LIE
    Posts
    722
    Mentioned
    48 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    he visually reminds me of zinedine zidane, who I have typed as ESI-D.
    Interesting. The way an ESI male treats other men has a pattern and it seems to exist with Zinedine Zidane as well. In this matter, I've seen similarities between Raymond Thiry and Marc Anthony, even though they come from vastly different backgrounds and cultures; they're also similar to the ESI men I've met in person.
    I really like your website by the way, it was truly needed in the German language and in an orderly form. The people you have picked for your gallery are also mostly contemporary figures I have analyzed or at least come across before.

    Btw, do you have an idea about the type of Pim Fortuyn?

  28. #28
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    LIE

    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  29. #29
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ESI



    this woman looks like adam's dream girl. Si kinda mixed with gamma architecture. basically designing a comfy place where LIE can meet tons of people and talk ad nauseam while ESI analyses the interpersonal relationships:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pt_5Faa_J-U
    Last edited by Still Alive; 04-28-2021 at 10:10 PM.
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  30. #30
    Adam Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    Midwest, USA
    TIM
    ENTJ-1Te 8w7 sx/so
    Posts
    16,852
    Mentioned
    1604 Post(s)
    Tagged
    2 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alive View Post
    ESI



    this woman looks like adam's dream girl. Si kinda mixed with gamma architecture. basically designing a comfy place where LIE can meet tons of people and talk ad nauseam while ESI analyses the interpersonal relationships:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pt_5Faa_J-U
    Thanks, @Alive. She's nice, but something's off. I'm not attracted to her. Not sure why.

  31. #31

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    2,115
    Mentioned
    108 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Alexis Ohanian talks to his kid so much like I talk to kids. Is he LIE?

  32. #32
    I don't play, I slay. Lolita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Near Whole Foods
    TIM
    SEE-N™ WPEL™ 863
    Posts
    1,146
    Mentioned
    85 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    What ESI sounds like; exemplifies Fi-
    I also think Mick Hucknell is ESI.


  33. #33
    I don't play, I slay. Lolita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Near Whole Foods
    TIM
    SEE-N™ WPEL™ 863
    Posts
    1,146
    Mentioned
    85 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Joe Rogan and CT Fletcher both SEE



  34. #34
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

  35. #35
    I don't play, I slay. Lolita's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2020
    Location
    Near Whole Foods
    TIM
    SEE-N™ WPEL™ 863
    Posts
    1,146
    Mentioned
    85 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Terry Crews SEE. He’s talking to another SEE and they’re in agreement that using violence to subdue others isn’t the way. That’s Se+. It’s the power to not let others push you into violence and be in control of your situation and not let it get out of hand. It’s the Fi that makes SEE wants others to feel what they feel, but they regret using violence as a vehicle. Fi+ Is forgiveness.


  36. #36

    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    TIM
    ILI - H/C 4w5 sp/sx
    Posts
    673
    Mentioned
    22 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    An angry SEE from my childhood anime



  37. #37

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    whatever
    Posts
    610
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    SEE

  38. #38

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    whatever
    Posts
    610
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    ILI

  39. #39

    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    whatever
    Posts
    610
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    SEE



    SEE

  40. #40
    Still Alive's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    TIM
    LII-C
    Posts
    4,953
    Mentioned
    279 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Arthur Conan Doyle - ILI
    Quote Originally Posted by idiot View Post
    I have been thinking about what Alive was saying about everyone on here being IEI, and I conclude that he is right, or at least he is on to something.

    If Jung based his theories on the people he met in his life, even if he met more people than the average person, that means that he based his theories on a certain type of person. The type of person who might go to him for therapy or talks, or who might believe the esoteric ideas he was spouting at the time. Thus it's possible that he did not categorize all humans into types, but just made subtypes for a specific type of person. This overarching type of person is the same type that is heavily interested in theories of this kind, and whom Alive says is an IEI.

    Therefore, Alive is right. We are all IEIs with subtypes. With that, I'm off this forum
    https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...ung-s-subjects

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •