inb4 Bi curious
I don't want to know why I'm LII, I want to know: Why am I not ILI?
I can debunk any information you can bring up.
inb4 Bi curious
I don't want to know why I'm LII, I want to know: Why am I not ILI?
I can debunk any information you can bring up.
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
Doesn't this taciturn stuff apply to you ?
Because you are an ILI in motion.
If you go through my posts, when I ask questions, I don't ask to keep a conversation going. I want a specific answer from someone when I do that. In conservations, I take in what people present, but I prefer to respond as a whole without bringing up small points and trying to find consensus on little things. Check my VMs.Askers
- tendency to dialogue
- much of what an askers says seems more question-like, even statements
- always, as the other person talks, affirm the receipt of information with yeah, mhm, etc.
- call talk to an audience as a whole very well
- starts talking at times expecting someone to get interested and start paying attention
- has a tendency to interrupt and feels comfortable pausing half way on the speech and with "questions allowed all the time" way, returning to what was said later if necessary
- quite often asks a non-rhetorical question and answers it himself
- often just asks questions to fill in time, without serious need to actually find the information asked
Declarers
- tendency to monologue
- much of what a declarer says seems more statement-like, even questions
- listens attentively and silently to others' speeches to return to a long speech
- finds it easier to talk to one person at a time
- before starting to talk, first ascertains that attention is grabbed
- is very patient in terms of others speeches in terms of letting finish
- prefers to finish the speech before letting others talk, likes closure and that their point was conveyed
- questions are often either rhetorical or only strictly motivated by serious need for certain information
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
It doesn't work that way, ESC. You can't prove a negative. The burden of proof is on the person making the claim.
Basically, you have to prove why you're ILI, they don't have to prove why you're not.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance
i'm not sticking to the framework, sorry. bc whats obvious to me is that you regularly condense concepts down into the smallest common denominator, like a bunch of information in a tiny package that i find difficult to try to understand because i'd have to read your mind to open it. and from my perspective this is classic Ti. i see it in other LIIs on the forum all the time. Ti demonstrative is one thing, but the demonstrative is not going to be the most obvious and common thing that a person shows in communication.
i'll try to keep my comments in this thread from now on, btw, sorry for poking you about this elsewhere.
I don't know ? Send me your photo(s) ? I'm terribly skilled in V.I.
http://www.socionics.us/tests/1/0.htmIs there a performance test I can do?
Is good ?
But it didn't stop you from agreeing with her, must be type related...I don't have a type for Maritsa, her persona was too ridiculous.
I don't want proof, I want to know why you guys don't think I can be ILI. I'm curious.
But you don't realize that most everything I speak of on this forum is theoretical. We haven't had the opportunity to discuss things I don't experiment with i.e. things I know.
I don't explain every single because when I'm on a roll I don't like to wait for people to catch up, blame this on being a regular on an INTP forum.
Besides:
It's a pain for me to really explain myself.Demonstrative
xLI - Personal philosophy - > Getting people on your level to do business
Not down with familiarity.
Not a performance test, I mean like is there a task that I can perform.
I just went along to avoid problems, path of least resistance. Though a few things I liked what she said.But it didn't stop you from agreeing with her, must be type related...
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
Please...
Haha, drop dead ?Not a performance test, I mean like is there a task that I can perform.
Why are you running away from problems and what were the things you liked about her ? In a nutshell, of course.I just went along to avoid problems, path of least resistance. Though a few things I liked what she said.
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
Show us your face.
Did you came straight from MBTI and figure your type was the same in socionics? Something to consider. I tested as INTJ in MBTI but it seems I just got lucky.
Your uber-theoretical bent definitely speaks of leading, not . Although I don't agree with many of your ideas, I find you to be a reasonable and open-minded person and I feel like I understand your thought process (more so than if you were ILI). I think we're similar in other ways too, sense of humor for instance. Whereas with ILIs there is more of a gap in perspective.
Si?I just went along to avoid problems, path of least resistance. Though a few things I liked what she said.
Ne?I don't want proof, I want to know why you guys don't think I can be ILI. I'm curious.
you seem unproblematically ILI to me.
if there's one faulty tendency i see among practitioners of socionics it is that of assuming people within one type category form more homogeneous groups than they do in reality.
I went through that process 8 months ago. I've been here since October, been into Socionics since last Summer.
My initial thought was that INTP carried over and I started to put faith into Socionics theory. Then something, I don't remember what, caused me to believe INTP was closer to LII, then I reverted my Socionics beliefs to reflect that(and made huge mistakes I hope no one ever uncovers). However, as the energy from the many intertype relations I had kicked in(and a realization of other things), I knew definitely that LII was out of the question, and that ILI was the only choice. I mentioned a bit of this in my first thread.
That may be so, but I think the difference(if any) between Acc/Cre [+Ti/-Te; -Ti/+Te] should be taken into consideration.Your uber-theoretical bent definitely speaks of leading, not .
Perhaps you're not LII?Although I don't agree with many of your ideas, I find you to be a reasonable and open-minded person and I feel like I understand your thought process (more so than if you were ILI). I think we're similar in other ways too, sense of humor for instance. Whereas with ILIs there is more of a gap in perspective.
The path of least resistance is definitely Gamma/Delta Seriousness(+, -).Si?
I don't understand people's perspective. Curiosity has been tied to . I see it as wanting to know the truth or "Why".Ne?
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
Some people think you're TiNe because you're interested in mental masturbation. Exact same thing happened to Aiss. Both wrong.
Technically speaking, that's still an erroneous perspective. No one thinks that you CAN'T be an ILI. For all we know, you could be an ESE and your online persona is a total fake.
People just happen to think that another type is a better fit, while not saying that ILI isn't a possible fit.
Just because someone believes that another type fits you better, it does not follow that they believe you can't be ILI.
So you're asking for data supporting an illogical conclusion which you will always be able to refute.
Some people have claimed with apparent certainty that I'm LII. If I'm LII then I cannot be that which is ILI. So I want to know: what rids people of doubt of ILI?
Regardless of me refuting claims, I want perspective. I want to know why. So I can see it from their eyes.
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
FWIW, I think you're ILI/INTp, you sweat and fart , but I'm still curious to see what you look like (obviously for VI purposes).
You may say, "Why?" to which you know what I will say: "Why not?" It's not going to kill you, it's not going to hurt anybody, you're not going to lose anything. The only other reason I can see why you wouldn't want to put it is probably some sort of inhibition or fear, whatever it is, it's all good. You don't have to anyway.
Just a thought.
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
Why do you identify as Ti-Ne on the INTP forum?
Your characteristic arguments are essentially reductionist sets of non sequiturs bisected by equals signs. Their emphasis on form often comes at the expense of clear content. In their deductive, mathematical construction and hoped-for equilibrium they're rather similar to Krig's recent verbal mandala of quadra IEs. Both could be easily read as Ne-Ti, and for his own part I doubt Krig would disagree that he is an LII.
You've complained of being derided for your self-admittedly Ti-heavy ideas and their presentation, excusing their ineptitude by claiming they were born of demonstrative Ti. However, tcaud catches his own share of flack for his Ne-Ti contributions, and though he generally explains himself in prose rather than formulation, I don't recall anyone recasting him as anything but LII. The degree to which your thinking converges with his is unknown but you've openly lent him moral support, agreed with him, and even cited him numerous times when other self-styled Te-egos have rejected what he's said out of hand. Also like him, your musings are often catalyzed by fantasy games, though your fantasy-of-choice has a martial flavor rather than anime.
Then there's the business of your agreements with maritsa, which is curious since her analytical skills are just crap. Perhaps it's her damsel-in-distress act that appeals to you and you're just humoring a floundering airhead, or she might actually be an ESE as has been suggested, and her antics kindle a natural fire in your LII loins. In any event, I don't see other self-typed ILIs or LIEs concurring with her typings or their rationales, such that they are, as frequently as you do. Nor do the same individuals appear to accept your self-typing as ILI. I bring this up because the traits that one gravitates toward in others can reveal much about one's own qualities, as does one's reception and compatibility with others. That's something we all knew well before socionics landed in our laps.
Beyond all that you just don't give off the same vibe I've come to expect from the diverse range of other ILIs that I know, online or in person. None of this precludes your self-typing being correct but from what you've shown it strikes me as improbable, and I think you're an LII.
I've long since been out of that MBTI mindset. MBTI - > Socionics requires a perspective shift, so it wouldn't do my typing any justice to bring that up.
Does not ILI posses both and with which to produce and argue?
I have said elsewhere that given I am working with theory, I am out of my element, so to speak, as I have to constantly justify what I state, as I am very opinionated. I am kept on my toes being on a forum such as this with many valuers who need that kind of reasoning in order to accept my positions. As such I haven't been given a chance, since first joining, to settle in my natural state.
Just because a person is a different type doesn't mean they can't give moral support or agree or even cite them(which I've only done three times). Not to mention you're ignoring our conflict back when we were trying to find consensus when we were redefining elements.You've complained of being derided for your self-admittedly Ti-heavy ideas and their presentation, excusing their ineptitude by claiming they were born of demonstrative Ti. However, tcaud catches his own share of flack for his Ne-Ti contributions, and though he generally explains himself in prose rather than formulation, I don't recall anyone recasting him as anything but LII. The degree to which your thinking converges with his is unknown but you've openly lent him moral support, agreed with him, and even cited him numerous times when other self-styled Te-egos have rejected what he's said out of hand.
Evidence for fantasy?Also like him, your musings are often catalyzed by fantasy games, though your fantasy-of-choice has a martial flavor rather than anime.
Two things I can recall: The Matrix and my "Fighting Styles" thread. This is highly insufficient evidence for a typing.
I'm not into animated fantasy nor anime, I'm barely into current television programming or movies, so again, this is insufficient data.
Your understanding of the situation is inadequate. I was never "on Maristsa side", nor did I see her as a reliable source of information. I have said already that I entertained her because it was harmless fun just going along with her naivety, all the while engaging in other discussions on this board. I have truly agreed with maybe a few things she said, although what she agreed with me on is an entirely different subject.Then there's the business of your agreements with maritsa, which is curious since her analytical skills are just crap. Perhaps it's her damsel-in-distress act that appeals to you and you're just humoring a floundering airhead, or she might actually be an ESE as has been suggested, and her antics kindle a natural fire in your LII loins. In any event, I don't see other self-typed ILIs or LIEs concurring with her typings or their rationales, such that they are, as frequently as you do.
What you fail to realize is that I am fairly new and Maritsa hadn't had the time to annoy me to the point of most members here. I just didn't give a damn if she was her or not, she didn't really bother me.
True, although you ignore situational factors. I have been in a different energy state than I have been the first few months, so I am more accepting of other people, at the same time, more active.Nor do the same individuals appear to accept your self-typing as ILI. I bring this up because the traits that one gravitates toward in others can reveal much about one's own qualities, as does one's reception and compatibility with others. That's something we all knew well before socionics landed in our laps.
Assuming you know ILIs, regardless, it's not about opinion, but relational fact.Beyond all that you just don't give off the same vibe I've come to expect from the diverse range of other ILIs that I know, online or in person. None of this precludes your self-typing being correct but from what you've shown it strikes me as improbable, and I think you're an LII.
I doubt your own ILI typing.
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
you used the word "fun". your Alpha typing is sealed. you will never be able to convince these people again.
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
Let's try this:
Assuming I'm ILI, what's my subtype?
I was thinking ILI-C.
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
I know nothing about you, but assuming you're ILI, you're not ILI. Assuming that is like assuming that a homeless black man won't rape your mother: it's just silly.
In seriousness, though, the "Assuming X, what about Y" as a post is pretty uncharacteristic of how ILIs operate in most conditions. You're probably alpha NT like me. Get over it. It's awesome being alpha NT. Chicks think it's hot when we act silly.
I love you
JRiddy
—————King of Socionics—————
Ne-ENTp 7w8 sx/so
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
Whatever. Have fun in your wacky, subjective, magical world of pretend and make believe. "Hey, this should prove I'm a type, let's entertain outlandish hypothetical alternate reality-dimensions where up is down and Mexico is Canada and Charlie Chaplin was really ****** after all! Who cares if none of my hypotheticals have any bearing on reality, even potential reality, we're just assuming for the sake of satiating my own retarded sense of self-identity within the boundaries of a -infested personality theory!"
QED, bitch.
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
The funny thing is that before Gilly made that thread, no one had trouble with ILI.
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
You seem to be afraid of not being the type you are thinking you are . Anyway do you really believe what you write about your energy, Hordes of Ti valuers here etc.? And do you think that asking why you are not ILI is a normal approach for a debate? You know, prove me why I am not a green anteater and I will refute your statements..
And this is really nothing like Aiss case, she IS ILI and I have little doubts about that. They are nowhere near similar.
Looking for an Archnemesis. Willing applicants contact via PM.
ENFp - Fi 7w6 sp/sx
The Ineffable IEI
The Einstein ENTp
johari nohari
http://www.mypersonality.info/ssmall/
Looking for an Archnemesis. Willing applicants contact via PM.
ENFp - Fi 7w6 sp/sx
The Ineffable IEI
The Einstein ENTp
johari nohari
http://www.mypersonality.info/ssmall/
Right, so what does that tell you about now? Couldn't this be situational? I wasn't that active until Gilly forced me into the limelight, now I'm everywhere cause everyone's seen my name now.
It was better being a small fish.
I wasn't looking for a debate, I don't want to destroy anyone.
Yes, because Aiss and the other few ILIs here that may not even be ILIs are a source of exhaustive examples of of the full extent of the ILI; And you guys imposing typings have full understanding of my psychology, behavior, personality, and tendencies to the extent that you can really make a definitive decision of a psychological type. -__-You know, prove me why I am not a green anteater and I will refute your statements..
http://fuck-you-im-an-anteater.com/i...n-anteater.jpg
And this is really nothing like Aiss case, she IS ILI and I have little doubts about that. They are nowhere near similar.
Screw this
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor