I'm Curious

[EyeSeeCold]

inb4 Bi curious

I don't want to know why I'm LII, I want to know: Why am I not ILI?


I can debunk any information you can bring up.

[Absurd]

Doesn't this taciturn stuff apply to you ?

[Capitalist Pig]

Because you are an ILI in motion.

[EyeSeeCold]

Doesn't this taciturn stuff apply to you ?

Askers

1. tendency to dialogue
2. much of what an askers says seems more question-like, even statements
3. always, as the other person talks, affirm the receipt of information with yeah, mhm, etc.
4. call talk to an audience as a whole very well
5. starts talking at times expecting someone to get interested and start paying attention
6. has a tendency to interrupt and feels comfortable pausing half way on the speech and with "questions allowed all the time" way, returning to what was said later if necessary
7. quite often asks a non-rhetorical question and answers it himself
8. often just asks questions to fill in time, without serious need to actually find the information asked

Declarers

1. tendency to monologue
2. much of what a declarer says seems more statement-like, even questions
3. listens attentively and silently to others' speeches to return to a long speech
4. finds it easier to talk to one person at a time
5. before starting to talk, first ascertains that attention is grabbed
6. is very patient in terms of others speeches in terms of letting finish
7. prefers to finish the speech before letting others talk, likes closure and that their point was conveyed
8. questions are often either rhetorical or only strictly motivated by serious need for certain information

If you go through my posts, when I ask questions, I don't ask to keep a conversation going. I want a specific answer from someone when I do that. In conservations, I take in what people present, but I prefer to respond as a whole without bringing up small points and trying to find consensus on little things. Check my VMs.

[Absurd]

If you go through my posts, when I ask questions, I don't ask to keep a conversation going. I want a specific answer from someone when I do that. In conservations, I take in what people present, but I prefer to respond as a whole without bringing up small points and trying to find consensus on little things. Check my VMs.

Thats sounds like something Maritsa said earlier. I mean the format she presents why she is or isn't such and such type. What do you type Maritsa as ? ILI ?

Thanks for the info, though.

[EyeSeeCold]

Thats sounds like something Maritsa said earlier. I mean the format she presents why she is or isn't such and such type. What do you type Maritsa as ? ILI ?

Thanks for the info, though.

Except I'm aware of what I'm doing. How else can I convince one of my type without presenting information and showing how I fit into it?

Is there a performance test I can do?

I don't have a type for Maritsa, her persona was too ridiculous.

[Absurd]

Except I'm aware of what I'm doing. How else can I convince one of my type without presenting information and showing how I fit into it?

I don't know ? Send me your photo(s) ? I'm terribly skilled in V.I.

Is there a performance test I can do?

http://www.socionics.us/tests/1/0.htm

Is good ?

I don't have a type for Maritsa, her persona was too ridiculous.

But it didn't stop you from agreeing with her, must be type related...

[ashlesha]

i'm not sticking to the framework, sorry. bc whats obvious to me is that you regularly condense concepts down into the smallest common denominator, like a bunch of information in a tiny package that i find difficult to try to understand because i'd have to read your mind to open it. and from my perspective this is classic Ti. i see it in other LIIs on the forum all the time. Ti demonstrative is one thing, but the demonstrative is not going to be the most obvious and common thing that a person shows in communication.

i'll try to keep my comments in this thread from now on, btw, sorry for poking you about this elsewhere.

[mirrorsoul]

inb4 Bi curious

I don't want to know why I'm LII, I want to know: Why am I not ILI?


I can debunk any information you can bring up.

It doesn't work that way, ESC. You can't prove a negative. The burden of proof is on the person making the claim.

Basically, you have to prove why you're ILI, they don't have to prove why you're not.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ignorance