Results 1 to 29 of 29

Thread: What are Id block functions for? Ignoring and Demonstrative

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Airman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,541
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default What are Id block functions for? Ignoring and Demonstrative

    What are they used for? (functions 7 and 8).

  2. #2
    Creepy-male

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Air View Post
    What are they used for? (functions 7 and 8).
    They're the way of dealing with the world that you reject in favour of your ego functions. As such they tend to perceive information reactively and need to be "triggered", this is true of all vital functions.

    I suppose they can be "used" in that one is always aware of their Ignoring function, but pursues their base function instead, and similarly one can offer up their Demonstrative without reframing it in terms of their Creative (which is what normally happens).

  3. #3
    Exodus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    TIM
    LII
    Posts
    8,446
    Mentioned
    335 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    For doing my taxes.

  4. #4
    Lobo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    TIM
    EII 6w5
    Posts
    2,080
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I see them as complimenting your dual-seeking and hidden agenda functions respectively. Using your 7th can help bridge the gap of understanding between you and your dual and semi-dual, for one.

  5. #5
    Airman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,541
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Lobo View Post
    I see them as complimenting your dual-seeking and hidden agenda functions respectively. Using your 7th can help bridge the gap of understanding between you and your dual and semi-dual, for one.
    I have found this statement to be particularly interesting.

    imo these functions ARE used, but more rarely than Ego fctns, because they require the Ego (preferred) functions not to work at all in order to function.
    It is said they're used under stress, I agree, they can also be deliberately used in situations that demand them, because the person has quite a good grasp of them, though the person dislikes them.

  6. #6
    Lobo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    TIM
    EII 6w5
    Posts
    2,080
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Air View Post
    I have found this statement to be particularly interesting.

    imo these functions ARE used, but more rarely than Ego fctns, because they require the Ego (preferred) functions not to work at all in order to function.
    It is said they're used under stress, I agree, they can also be deliberately used in situations that demand them, because the person has quite a good grasp of them, though the person dislikes them.
    Hmmm, I don't think that's the case, actually. It's just that by using the 7th, you don't put as much attention on the function that is most linked to your sense of self-worth/confidence. As long as you're in a "safe" environment, where the function is taken under consideration, you shouldn't have any issues using your 7th. (what I just wrote is kind of crude, but I don't have much time atm).

  7. #7
    Azeroffs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    California
    TIM
    ENTj 3w4 sp/sx
    Posts
    2,200
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    In my view, 7 and 8 are elements that are, in terms of awareness, 'there' but not at the foreground of our thought. They heavily influence our subconscious. When brought to the forground by someone else, 7 is scoffed at as something that is superfluous and not worth spending energy on emphasizing, and 8 is regarded as obvious and was safely assumed. I think we see them as things that work themselves out because we always take care of it without thinking about it especially in the case of function 8. Function 7 is more or less something that is dismissed because it gets in the way of trying to pull out function 5 from wherever we can find it.

    For example, EIE may dismiss the idea that they are are infringing on someone's personal boundarys. Everyone is just having fun, they don't mean it that way. They may sigh in response because they just see it as an irritation. They may wonder why people emphasize such an irrlevance.

    OTOH, IEI are making the best of everyone's personal boundaries, and they already acted in a way that took that into consideration even though they didn't think about it. Their emotional engagement is more subdued and/or less frequent as a consequence, but more 'perfected' in the sense that all the details are taken care of. It's hard to even imagine an IEI or SEI making someone uncomfortable. So even if someone were to tell them they had to consider that, they wouldn't even take the statement seriously because it was so obvious and a complete non-issue. They might wonder why someone would bring up sosmething so obvious and ultimately not as high a priority anyway.
    3w4-5w6-9w8

  8. #8
    Slippery when wet Simon Ssmall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    ✈ ↺
    Posts
    2,225
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Air View Post
    What are they used for? (functions 7 and 8).
    It is used to deceive other in thinking you are another type. It helps to make friends with your conflictor to avoid hurting your Polar.
    Looking for an Archnemesis. Willing applicants contact via PM.

    ENFp - Fi 7w6 sp/sx
    The Ineffable IEI
    The Einstein ENTp

    johari nohari
    http://www.mypersonality.info/ssmall/

  9. #9
    Airman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,541
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by No Longer a Dating Site View Post
    It is used to deceive other in thinking you are another type. It helps to make friends with your conflictor to avoid hurting your Polar.
    lol I've found I can make people think I am beta ST by using the Id functions.

    THIS IS SO FUCKING FUN AND MAKES ME JUST WANT TO PUNCH SOMEONE IN THE FACE LOLOLOL.

    lol

  10. #10
    Coldest of the Socion EyeSeeCold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Holy Temple of St. Augusta
    Posts
    3,682
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Air View Post

    Someone said sometimes it's difficult to see whether someone is beta ST or delta ST because both have very good grasping of all S and T functions and can use them with proficiency. I have used lots of Se and use it with proficiency though I clearly prefer Si and use it much more.
    Knew an ESTp who was the new girl. She was definitely using her Id, as I thought she was a workaholic ESTj. But as she became one of us, she relaxed greatly, and started being all Beta-ish.
    (i)NTFS

    An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
    and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI

    31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
    My work on Inert/Contact subtypes

    Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
    Socionics Tests Database
    Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites


    Fidei Defensor

  11. #11
    Airman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Posts
    1,541
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EyeSeeCold View Post
    Knew an ESTp who was the new girl. She was definitely using her Id, as I thought she was a workaholic ESTj. But as she became one of us, she relaxed greatly, and started being all Beta-ish.
    that could be a rebellious ESTJ, there are beta-ish ESTJs and ISTPs. I dunno what exactly you mean by beta-ish, but look at 50 cent people type him ISTP and he's all beta-ish.

  12. #12
    Coldest of the Socion EyeSeeCold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Holy Temple of St. Augusta
    Posts
    3,682
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Air View Post
    that could be a rebellious ESTJ, there are beta-ish ESTJs and ISTPs. I dunno what exactly you mean by beta-ish, but look at 50 cent people type him ISTP and he's all beta-ish.
    Nah as time progressed everything became obvious. Very characteristic of an ESTp so I don't want to go into details, but DS and her HA insecurity were extremely clear. She's the one that got me into astrology.
    (i)NTFS

    An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
    and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI

    31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
    My work on Inert/Contact subtypes

    Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
    Socionics Tests Database
    Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites


    Fidei Defensor

  13. #13
    Slippery when wet Simon Ssmall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    ✈ ↺
    Posts
    2,225
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Air View Post
    lol I've found I can make people think I am beta ST by using the Id functions.

    THIS IS SO FUCKING FUN AND MAKES ME JUST WANT TO PUNCH SOMEONE IN THE FACE LOLOLOL.

    lol
    Yes yes,, this is exactly how it is used. You are perfectly aware of your Id functions and use them well.
    Looking for an Archnemesis. Willing applicants contact via PM.

    ENFp - Fi 7w6 sp/sx
    The Ineffable IEI
    The Einstein ENTp

    johari nohari
    http://www.mypersonality.info/ssmall/

  14. #14
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,937
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't think they're used. At best, I think people just attempt to emulate them through their ego fxns.
    i agree. i would argue that the absence of the non-ego functions explains their lack of prominence in the psyche better than any theory of them existing in a secondary capacity. the fact that it looks like a person is somewhat capable of using the ID functions is explained by the fact that these functions have things in common with the ego functions that allow them to be emulated by these.

    in short, they're a redundant postulate.

  15. #15
    Coldest of the Socion EyeSeeCold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Holy Temple of St. Augusta
    Posts
    3,682
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tcaudilllg View Post
    This is good. But it seems like each of those relationships can be inverted.
    Indeed. They need more consistency and precision.
    (i)NTFS

    An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
    and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI

    31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
    My work on Inert/Contact subtypes

    Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
    Socionics Tests Database
    Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites


    Fidei Defensor

  16. #16
    Coldest of the Socion EyeSeeCold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Holy Temple of St. Augusta
    Posts
    3,682
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Demonstrative

    xLI - Personal philosophy - > Getting people on your level to do business
    xEE - Personal influence - > Getting people on your team to make allies
    xII - Personal outlooks - > Getting people aware of the future to acknowledge the ability to change
    xSE - Personal territory - > Getting people to behave to create a controlled environment
    xEI - Personal allies - > Getting people to be allies to increase your influence
    xLE - Personal business - > Getting people to work together to understand their structure
    xSI - Personal comfort - > Getting people to be comfortable to declare your territory
    xIE - Personal abilities - > Getting people to acknowledge your abilities to change their outlooks(the future)

    Limiting / Observing / Ignoring
    (the words can be used interchangeably, so use them as such!)

    LxE - Philosophy - > Observing the structure of people and situations to control its business
    ExI - Influence - > Observing the influence of people and situations to control allies
    IxE - Outlooks - > Observing the outlooks of people and situations to control their abilities
    SxI - Territory - > Observing the territory of people and situations to control its suitability
    ExE - Allies - > Observing the allies of people and situations to control your influence
    LxI - Business - > Observing the business of people and situations to control its structure
    SxE - Suitability - > Observing the suitability of people and situations to control the territory
    IxI - Abilities - > Observing the abilities of people and situations to control the future
    (i)NTFS

    An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
    and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI

    31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
    My work on Inert/Contact subtypes

    Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
    Socionics Tests Database
    Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites


    Fidei Defensor

  17. #17
    Creepy-male

    Default

    What.

    SEI = Ignoring Se = Base Si = aware of power structures and power plays, but preferring to not take part in them.
    SEI = Demonstrative Fi = Creative Fe = aware of how actions impact relationships, and capable of forming right/wrong moral judgements of behaviour, but focuses on maintaining a relaxed, harmonious atmosphere that keeps people on good terms. Also inclined to discard judgements formed--why Fi PoLRs come across to Fi Demonstratives as "loveable assholes".

    See how this is just a restatement of the SEI's ego functions? The Mediator can equally refer to either SiFe Ego or FiSe Id.

    EDIT

    And what the hell does "suitability" even mean?

  18. #18
    Coldest of the Socion EyeSeeCold's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Holy Temple of St. Augusta
    Posts
    3,682
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by The Egbert Human View Post
    What.

    SEI = Ignoring Se = Base Si = aware of power structures and power plays, but preferring to not take part in them.
    SEI = Demonstrative Fi = Creative Fe = aware of how actions impact relationships, and capable of forming right/wrong moral judgements of behaviour, but focuses on maintaining a relaxed, harmonious atmosphere that keeps people on good terms. Also inclined to discard judgements formed--why Fi PoLRs come across to Fi Demonstratives as "loveable assholes".
    Agreed.

    See how this is just a restatement of the SEI's ego functions? The Mediator can equally refer to either SiFe Ego or FiSe Id.
    Definitely.

    However, the idea is to see how a type directs their Id toward Ego pursuits. This is for people who need to understand how it works, and what it looks like.

    Also, types who have similar Creative/Demonstrative:

    FPs are diplomatic.
    TPs are resourceful.
    FJs are socially controlling.
    TJs are business-like.

    EDIT

    And what the hell does "suitability" even mean?
    Still trying to figure this one out. It encompasses comfort, "rightness", like good vibes about a situation.
    (i)NTFS

    An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
    and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI

    31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
    My work on Inert/Contact subtypes

    Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
    Socionics Tests Database
    Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites


    Fidei Defensor

  19. #19
    Contrarian Traditionalist Krig the Viking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Canada's Prairie Farmland
    TIM
    C-LII
    Posts
    2,608
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ashton View Post
    I don't think they're used. At best, I think people just attempt to emulate them through their ego fxns.
    This is of course one significant area where we differ.

    Quote Originally Posted by The Egbert Human View Post
    SEI = Ignoring Se = Base Si = aware of power structures and power plays, but preferring to not take part in them.
    SEI = Demonstrative Fi = Creative Fe = aware of how actions impact relationships, and capable of forming right/wrong moral judgements of behaviour, but focuses on maintaining a relaxed, harmonious atmosphere that keeps people on good terms. Also inclined to discard judgements formed--why Fi PoLRs come across to Fi Demonstratives as "loveable assholes".?
    An excellent description; pretty much exactly how I would have described it.

    The Id is just as aware of the details and complexities of what's going on with its elements out there in the world, but prefers to handle them quickly and quietly, without talking or thinking too much about them. An LII, for example, will be quite good at improving the efficiency or productivity of a task (Te), and will do so if necessary, but gets really bored and even annoyed if people want to talk about it and focus attention on it too much. It's a bothersome task that he feels like he has to take care of before he gets back to the things he really cares about: his Ego functions.
    Quaero Veritas.

  20. #20
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    TIM
    TiNe
    Posts
    7,858
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by EyeSeeCold View Post
    Demonstrative

    xLI - Personal philosophy - > Getting people on your level to do business
    xEE - Personal influence - > Getting people on your team to make allies
    xII - Personal outlooks - > Getting people aware of the future to acknowledge the ability to change
    xSE - Personal territory - > Getting people to behave to create a controlled environment
    xEI - Personal allies - > Getting people to be allies to increase your influence
    xLE - Personal business - > Getting people to work together to understand their structure
    xSI - Personal comfort - > Getting people to be comfortable to declare your territory
    xIE - Personal abilities - > Getting people to acknowledge your abilities to change their outlooks(the future)

    Limiting / Observing / Ignoring
    (the words can be used interchangeably, so use them as such!)

    LxE - Philosophy - > Observing the structure of people and situations to control its business
    ExI - Influence - > Observing the influence of people and situations to control allies
    IxE - Outlooks - > Observing the outlooks of people and situations to control their abilities
    SxI - Territory - > Observing the territory of people and situations to control its suitability
    ExE - Allies - > Observing the allies of people and situations to control your influence
    LxI - Business - > Observing the business of people and situations to control its structure
    SxE - Suitability - > Observing the suitability of people and situations to control the territory
    IxI - Abilities - > Observing the abilities of people and situations to control the future
    This is good. But it seems like each of those relationships can be inverted.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •