Sergei Ganin muddies the waters when he says that
is about understanding, or when he says in his posts that
is axiomatic logic or asking "why" questions, or when he says that ILI types are mainly interested in business while LII types are the ones interested in more academic topics. Anyhow, I think it's pretty clear that SG doesn't like INTps and makes every effort to describe them disparagingly, as in when he says that since INTps...
...can believe in things that are not necessarily there or actually true, INTps criticise a lot.