Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan
Sergei Ganin muddies the waters when he says that is about understanding, or when he says in his posts that is axiomatic logic or asking "why" questions, or when he says that ILI types are mainly interested in business while LII types are the ones interested in more academic topics. Anyhow, I think it's pretty clear that SG doesn't like INTps and makes every effort to describe them disparagingly, as in when he says that since INTps...

...can believe in things that are not necessarily there or actually true, INTps criticise a lot.
It is not very difficult for that to occur, especially, I would imagine, if you had more and more conflicting nature in regards to INTps..

=========
=========

!!!

Oh, here's a question, and something I've had on my mind for the last 24 hours:



How about LII in terms of relation to other types?
Duality, conflict, and even reaction to INTps come to mind... -- how what do the rest of you think about that, or, using such relationships to gain perspective on a person's type (or designations of an LII) ?