Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: LIIs-INTjs and reading manuals

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,937
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    I don't typically pore over any manual for months; but with that qualification removed it sounds like something people in general do (i.e. erring on the side figuring things out yourself and not letting the manual confuse you).

  2. #2
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,937
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    This had ended badly several times.
    If it goes wrong once for ever five times it goes right, you've probably already made the favorable time investment.

  3. #3
    Ti centric krieger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5,937
    Mentioned
    80 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    C++ is potentially something you'll be using lots of times throughout a lifetime, so it's something I'd be more likely to read up on the details of than, say, a video recorder.

    unfortunately it generally happens when it's my stuff he's meddling with.
    When configuring another person's "stuff", tiny differences in habits turn into major obstacles and undermine the assumptions that enable you to configure things quickly in your own domain. I think it's pretty common for people to underestimate the difficulty of the task, regardless what type they are.

    I'm personally reluctant to ask people for help on such things for this reason. They always end up being confused by something I do "different".

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    BC
    Posts
    205
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by octopuslove View Post
    If it helps, they were more like C++ textbooks.
    C++ itself isn't really a well design language that you could figure out using 'common sense'. It has so many gotchas that it's justifiable to read it while trying to program. The question is: why isn't he using .NET/Java?

  5. #5
    jason_m's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    1,309
    Mentioned
    45 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Something that has deep, interesting logic to it - yes.

    Something that is as dry and voluminous as a telephone book I leave to someone else...
    Last edited by jason_m; 06-06-2019 at 09:00 PM.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    TIM
    LII-Ne
    Posts
    5,830
    Mentioned
    537 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ozz View Post
    C++ itself isn't really a well design language that you could figure out using 'common sense'. It has so many gotchas that it's justifiable to read it while trying to program. The question is: why isn't he using .NET/Java?
    Don’t use .NET, but isn’t it difficult to use on any platform that’s not Windows? And Java can’t do all C++ can. Too abstracted. Can’t manage memory directly, no pointers, and there’s the syntax which is annoyingly verbose. But I started with C, so I’m biased.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •