FUCK YEAH, SPECIAL OPERATIONS, BITCHES.
FUCK YEAH, SPECIAL OPERATIONS, BITCHES.
ESTj - Sturmtiger
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
Hmm... I was gonna pick SFOD-D/CAG ("Delta Force") for myself, but in my personal case the 160th SOAR (A) ("Night Stalkers") might be more appropriate.
I will ask if I may lend my dad's Waffen SS suit.
Fe:
the Angry Mob
AK-47s FOR EVERYONE
Hell yeah, Ashton
What do you think of this?
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...rcraft+carrier
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
I feel like Infantry is more fitting of EJ temperament, what with their being focused on a sort of "flooding" tactic and dependent on the same sort of constant balancing-control utilization that EJ functions work with. Elite units like Marines, Rangers, Seals, etc, which use fewer, more highly trained troops that play specialized roles, would be like the p sub EJs, having less overall impact and fewer numbers but a more specialized function (closer to IP "special ops").
IMO EP is more akin to bombers/jets (land warfare blah blah blah), that are designed to strike single targets quickly with overwhelming force and then disappear, although j sub EPs might be more akin to armor/mobile artillery, having the single-target high striking power with less mobility and more armor (closer to the stationary artillery IJ temperament but still offensive in nature). RPGs could also apply here, I guess, for major P sub EPs; I suppose the mean would probably fall somewhere in the realm of a Humvee.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Speaking on air war:
Blackhawk, Apache helicopters --> Ep
Stealth bombers --> Ip
Bombers --> Ij
Fighters --> Ej
Tankers--> ?
AWACS --> ?
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
In ancient battles, cavalry is the equivalent of tanks. However, cavalry was a last resort option, whereas tanks are the backbone of warfare nowadays, I think (at least in the video games!).
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
In strategy/tactic games I always prefer a stealthy approach with concealable units, sabotage, fighting behind the frontlines, ect. I don't know all common strategies but this guerilla style seems to be pretty effective. I also like to wipe out massive firepower with small hit&run attacks. Besides that, my second choice would be fast and manoeuvrable units with limited firepower similar to a Blitzkrieg tactic.
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
This thread is great.