With #1, probably largely work issues, but also whether I'd make a good mom. With #2, probably how it would affect #1.
I think #1 is IEE. Not sure about #2. Introvert, maybe SEI.
With #1, probably largely work issues, but also whether I'd make a good mom. With #2, probably how it would affect #1.
I think #1 is IEE. Not sure about #2. Introvert, maybe SEI.
Oh yeah, and Sept. 11 happened early in my pregnancy with #1, and there was a certain amount of "Oh god what kind of world am I bringing this baby into?"
Isn't there a contradiction in the results?
Sociotype is determined by pregnancy, but all the twins had different sociotypes.
But when the mother was pregnant, she was pregnant of both at the same time, how can they have different sociotypes then if the pregnancy determines sociotype?
WorkaholicsAnon is an identical twin.
I think it could be partly genetic and partly random, or partly genetic, partly womb conditions, partly random. I feel skeptical of the theory in the OP though.
Since my Mom is my super-ego I guess she was just being herself.
ILI (FINAL ANSWER)
thanks everybody. maybe it's a little bit too half baked an idea. seemed worth asking about though.
i tried to google the researcher in question and didn't find anything to further explicate what the wiki article was saying about the mother's concerns. for myself i just went with my own interpretation.
but it seems that my concerns are very similar to Mariella's and i bet most moms. so the idea seems captivating but perhaps is ultimately too supernatural.
lol
ILE
those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often
Yeah, it all seems rather unplausible to me. And self-contradictory (as someone else ponited out, how can the author claim that the mother's concerns during pregnancy determine the PoLR function, but then go on to say that twins rarely share the same type?).
The theory, sadly, was probably formed by some IEE type...
My life's work (haha):
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/blog.php?b=709
Input, PLEASEAnd thank you