I have noticed that some duals show very little emotion/enthusiasm. Maybe it has to do with circumstance (her being in the military); She might just be focusing on the activity/objective.Originally Posted by 1981slater
@Jessica
Do you display enthusiasm in real life?
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Maritsa, I am not your dual and we don't get along. We could, but you stuff your opinion down everyones throat and don't listen to anyone elses opinion but your own..something which you ironically keep calling ME out for. I am not LSE so let's just drop that. Nothing about me is Delta. I've met ThePirate and he typed me LSI and I like to think he's on point with his typings, I simply wanted others opinions on ESI or other possible types (aside from LSE).
No.
Yeah, but LSI do Ti where they take two other things that people write, outside themselves (for example, you would be reading two comments in this thread and posting one response with the two comments and then compare them to find a match between them) you don't do this ANYWHERE. HOW can you be Ti??? HOW????
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
@Maritsa33
HA!
When you're watching a game (sporting event)?
Jessica, my typing for you is not LSI.
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 02-13-2011 at 05:38 PM.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
No. I never get enthusiastic about anything. Ever.
You're right. I'll go with SLI too.IMO, very unlikely. She looks rather "anti-enthusiast"/creative
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
@jessica129
What was it that first interested you about Socionics and why drives you to continue learning about it?
I just showed how I listen to you by listening you tell me that you don't get enthusiastic. Now, I hope we'll get along just fine.
Ms. Rolleyes. She's your dual; isn't that great?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Exhibit A: A supposed like for ENFps, especially in that somewhat-recent "Post ENFp videos" thread.
Exhibit B: Being turned off by so-typed EXFjs (Tyra Banks, Kate Gosselin, others)
Exhibit C: VI-ing like Te-ISTp.
Judgment: See C
When I first came, it was to learn about relationships and interactions I had with other people. That's still why I come here along with trying to understand myself better...but it's mainly focused on understanding intertype relations.
@ Galen ..*sigh* I know. I honestly don't think i could ever conflict with an IEE for whatever that is worth...
Yeah I've noticed lol. This is mostly why I think an ISTj typing for you is bullshit.
I like your "head-in-the-sand" mentality and staying out of others' drama attitude. I see much of those same qualities in myself.
In all fairness though, jessica, sometimes you get in these weird cynical, seemingly angry moods that just make me want to shake you and demand that you tell me what's wrong :/
Also, why have the username jessica if it's not your real name?
Yeah, I haven't been in a very good place mentally this last year. A lot of changes that weren't for the better. I guess that comes out here...this place is often a place I come to dump all of the negative energy so I'm sorry haha. I need to keep that in check because I'm not this angry IRL, trust me.
I made Jessica as my SN one day because i didn't want anyone knowing my real name and I guess it just stuck.
Well i'm impressed that you've finally come to terms with the fact that I'm IEE.But i'm still not totally convinced Jessica is SLI.
Conflictors dont always feel like they'll conflict and actually do like each other from a distance. So Jessica saying she could never imagine herself conflicting with an IEE is really sweet(thanks Jessica) and I dont see anything completely abominable about her either, but I dont think that is evidence against her being LSI. If Jessica is not identifying with the SLI type, especially after interacting so much in the socionics community (so it's not like she's a newb who is just impulsively saying this without an understanding of the theory), I suspect she is probably not SLI.
Socionics is, as you have said yourself Maritsa, simple when it works. It's not something one should have to fight against, because it's a phenomenon that happens whether we are aware of it or not. So if SLI seems off to Jessica, that is likely not her type.
Jessica have you considered ILI as a possible type? I do remember seeing a couple of photos of you a while back and your face did seem awfully devoid of Fe. If SLI isn't fitting and LSI is off too, ILIs can sometimes look a little like SLIs too. But if you're saying you know you're not Te-valuing, then that's out. By the same token, LSIs can sometimes look a little like LIIs.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
oh ho!! I didn't even see this post when i brought up the ILI possibility in my previous post. Maybe we're onto something here...I like your "head-in-the-sand" mentality and staying out of others' drama attitude. I see much of those same qualities in myself.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
You're awfully convincing though Galen.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
ILI has always been a possibility but SLI/LSI seemed more likely. These are the only types I can see for myself so I'll narrow it down:
LSI
ESI
SLI
ILI
SLE
Exciteable as in enthusiastically happy? Cuz no, never. I mean, I smile a lot..haha but i'm not jumping around like a fool, I'd never, ever do that. People tell me too often I come across as very... composed if that helps. The only emotions I feel able to express is happiness and anger. Anything outside of that is a stretch for me.
Hmm do you ever get irritated/nervous when people randomly jump from topic to topic in conversations? I think this may ring true for lsis with ne polr.
No, I like that. When someone stays on a topic too long and drags something out, it's highly irritating to me.
Type Aptitude
Alpha
[**]
ILE[*]
LII
[**]
ESE[*]
SEI
[**]
Beta
[****]
SLE
[***]
LSI
[****]
EIE
[**]
IEI[*]
Gamma
[***]
SEE
[**]
ESI
[***]
LIE
[***]
ILI
[***]
Delta
[***]
SLI
[****]
LSE
[***]
EII[*]
IEE[*]
If I'm really bored I'll display this info graphically!
I believe you are an introverted type, T > F for sure, and ST. SLI>LSI.
That's alright, I just wanted to know what's up because it's kinda distressing to see things like that. Parkster did the same sort of thing a while ago. I also was just kinda musing that this seeming anger was partly a justification for typing as ISTj, although that doesn't seem to be the case so nevermind
I disagree with your interpretation of this fragment - it's largely irrelevant to what jessica asks, simply because "jumping from topic to topic" vs "quickly finish, summarize" are very different things. I actually tend to see dialectical-algorithmic as smoothly moving between topics, not focused on target, as opposed to vortex "conclusiveness" on a given topic, going back to it for this conclusion before moving on. Either one could be seen as jumping from topic to topic, I guess, but the former seems more like that.
Also, I happen to think most of this section seems to refer to things which are scarcely if at all type related (naturalistic/artificial, ffs!), so I'd take it, along with Gulenko's inspired comments on ILI programming skills or SLE battle geniuses, or evolution/creationism preferences (), with a (large) grain of salt
To not be completely and entirely off-topic: I don't really know you, I could see an LSI typing, I don't see Ip, and I realize people online and irl are two different things, so don't take it too seriously.
Stop caring, your cool as you are and you will never ever stop doubting your type anyway. And it is one of the reasons I don't buy that much that you are a j type. Also I don't see T > F as obvious (although it is more likely), you may just aswell be a serious type. INTp or ISTp makes most sense to me personally. But overall Id say that it doesnt really matter, be you, makes it more fun.
Looking for an Archnemesis. Willing applicants contact via PM.
ENFp - Fi 7w6 sp/sx
The Ineffable IEI
The Einstein ENTp
johari nohari
http://www.mypersonality.info/ssmall/
Lol, well I'd hesitate to jump to any conclusions based off just that. But FWIW, I always thought Jessica seemed cool and like someone I would get along with, we've just never really had the chance to interact before.
Rotflmfao. I think I'm adding the underlined part to my signature.
...And you said I don't have Se leading.
Just in general, I'd find it really weird for leading Fi to apologize about posting a thread, possibly drawing attention to themselves. ISFjs.... are just more confident, in general, that what they're doing is right. They have this own mode of ethics.
So I don't think ISFj makes sense, and from what I've seen so far. I thought ISTj fit fairly well with your posts.
See, I do acknowledge others who have been here longer than me, like Ashton, have a much better overall say than I do.
But like I said, what I've seen so far, ISTj fits pretty well. Perhaps slightly off, it's worth considering other types, but I don't think ISFj or INFj make any sense, cause I don't see Fi leading.
This is a perfect idea for my thread. I keep forgetting to mention, a large part why I think I'm SLE, is the strong mastery of tactics. Loving strategy games. War games, real-time strategy, etc. .......
...... But I'll bring that up in my thread.
That's actually the same opinion I've held about jessica for a while now lol
Well thanks guys. I always just assume no one likes me until they say otherwise.
that's how i feel as well...
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Lol, I usually assume the opposite.Well thanks guys. I always just assume no one likes me until they say otherwise.
If you do figure out your type, let me know, because you type/sound and, from the 'unofficial member's pics thread', I think you VI like this one girl I know. I'm unsure of her type too.
She's polite, shy, friendly, insanely humble, sometimes lacking self-confidence, loves to goof around and joke and have silly fun, loves hanging with other people who are silly and bring a nerdy atmosphere. One of her best friends was a self-confident braniac, nerdy, and they got along really well.
And there's also this side of her that's very much TOMBOY. She shoots guns, rides motorcyle, works on cars, has a high tolerance for physical pain, knows karate, etc. Quite honestly, she intimidates a lot of the guys she dates, without meaning to. But she's a sweetheart deep down.
She has lots of pictures of family and friends saved on her laptop, and loves sharing/creating moments with loved ones. Shes loves the goodness in people, and sometimes has a hard time understanding people's bad intentions.
Does any of that relate to you?
Kind of late to jump on this thread, but I'll give another vote to SLI. So much of what I'm seeing in Jessica is Te/Fi valuing. I haven't seen much suggestive of Ti/Fe valuing as would be the case with LSI.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
lol, me too.I always just assume no one likes me until they say otherwise.
@ Jessica: You have always seem ISTp to me imo. Anyway, whenever I read your posts, I thought you are pretty cool at times since you tend to speak out on what's on your mind and do not try to please people. I have to agree with what Galen had mentioned that you seem to gravitate towards ENFps, sometimes unknowlingly. I guess any of us here will tend to take on some of the beliefs of other quadras at times. Nevertheless, you seem to consistently demonstrate Delta and IP qualities imo.
Yes indeed....yeeesss indeed.
......
,
Hmmm...I only skimmed over these posts 'cause I'm lazy), heh, but I thought I'd chime in for what it's worth (considering I may not even remember this thread with as much as I get sidetracked on things
) Nevertheless, I have a very strong hunch you are indeed SLI. I'd be extremely--no, uberly
I've dwelled on it a bit before in the past and seemed to come to the conclusion about you being a Normalizing SLI. I could see LSI being your persona type and SLI your ego (if you buy into Gulenko's dual-type theory). I'm very bad at explaining myself logically when it comes to these things though (and lack the patience most days
), so I'm sure my opinion isn't going to hold much merit here, but I thought I'd speak my mind anyways
Mark my words though young lady, if you ever find duality bliss, it will be with an IEE
Don't mean to pry though
Let it be known--the wise sage from the sacred hilltop hath spoken
*edges backward ever so slowly, stealthily, like a......uh, sly, slippery snake*
*vanishes into thin air*
Well I sure am surprised with the SLI responses, I hope that the reason for people saying that isn't because I typed myself that and went by that for like 4 years. I didn't know anything about socionics then. And what video is everyone talking about? It's funny because I don't even remember...
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
