- he identifies with descriptions of Ti and Se himself
- he gets along with Fe-valuing types and afaik relates to IEIs
- he is suspicious of IEEs, has even accused them of being "pathological liars", which is the usual dynamic for conflictors to grow suspicious of one another
Last edited by silke; 04-23-2012 at 08:14 AM.
First of all, this guy is not talking about Socionics, but about MBTI, so I have a few reservations about the things he says. First of all, the way MBTI describes information elements mostly reduces them to senseless Forer Effect ramblings that can be used to explain basically anything.
Then, he used Fe all the time, in a demonstrative fashion (sometimes mixed with Ne): e.g musically tapping his hands and fingers at 0:17 and 1:00 and 13:55. Makes funny faces and acts "super bubbly" at 1:22. He then rationalizes this by saying "I'm exaggerating right now, just for the sake of showing you the difference" (1:33, typical way of IEE making a point). "Once I start activating my Fe. I start... expressing myself and becoming a lot more interesting (4:33). IMO, he's giving perfect examples of demonstrative Fe.
He describes Ti with concepts that basically come down to what Socionics calls Si: "pretty passionless, pretty callous, kind of a monotonous voice" (1:14). "The way you physically use Ti...is just to relax all the muscles in your face" (2:09) Nowhere he mentions Ti as a form of "formal logic".
Another observation:
- 2:53-3:00 Fi emotionality, he relaxes his face around in demonstration 3:20, but the hurt still shows, even at 3:47 where he denies still feeling hurt.
I've listened very carefully to the video, but I guess I missed the part where he says ENFPs (I assume that's what you mean by IEE) are pathological liars. What I want to say about that: we should not forget that MBTI, as it is practised by many enthousiasts, is very much influenced by David Keirsey's descriptions of types, and the Keirsey ENFP is actually much more like Socionics EIE. BTW, He seems to critize leading and creative Fe types (in the Socionics sense) a lot.
So what type is this guy? I think it's pretty much clear only after a few seconds he's IEE! Typical IEE face (the guy looks like a Rick DeLong with blond hair), behavior is IEE, emotionality is Fi-creative, this whole video is basically an IEE rambling Ne and demonstrative Fe. He claims he can hide emotions, but in this video gloriously fails at the attempts. That he can be unemotional, as he claims it, is also not uncommon to IEEs:
Last edited by consentingadult; 02-13-2012 at 07:31 PM. Reason: typo
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
Oh, I haven't typed him from this video alone. There is a lot of information and context that you're missing here trying to type him from one short video, resulting in you coming to some rather wild conclusions.
What he is talking about in this particular video has no bearing on his socionics type. There are quite a few members of MBTI communities who dabble in various others typologies and he has said himself that he identifies with Ti-Se and beta quadra values.
Anybody can be unemotional at various periods in their life. I haven't seen a single human being who would be brimming with emotions all the time. This is a very poor argument for typing someone.
Last edited by silke; 04-23-2012 at 08:13 AM.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
Your level of caring is not important. He knows himself better than you ever will from watching a single video. So you can take your presumptuous, uninformed opinion and shove it where such opinions usually get shoved.
Btw, this is not the first Beta ST that you've tried to re-type into IEE which happens to be your own type - link. Taking into account your recent comments concerning having erotic preferences for victims link1 link2, one may wonder whether you're trying to overidentify with aggressors by believing them to be identical with you.
He isn't wrong about Ti since he isn't talking about socionics Ti in the first place. You're mixing up two typologies and being horribly inconsistent in your arguments.
Last edited by silke; 04-23-2012 at 08:13 AM.
Roza Shanina perhaps
George Mallory
"Have we vanquished an enemy? None but ourselves."
“[EVER*EST] WAS A PRODI*GIOUS WHITE FANG EXCRES*CENT FROM THE JAW OF THE WORLD… WE WERE SAT*IS*FIED THAT THE HIGH*EST OF MOUN*TAINS WOULD NOT DIS*AP*POINT US.”
“BECAUSE IT’S THERE… EVER*EST IS THE HIGH*EST MOUN*TAIN IN THE WORLD, AND NO MAN HAS REACHED ITS SUM*MIT. ITS EXIS*TENCE IS A CHAL*LENGE. THE ANSWER IS INSTINC*TIVE, A PART, I SUP*POSE, OF MAN’S DESIRE TO CON*QUER THE UNIVERSE.”
http://blog.theclymb.com/passions/ex...eorge-mallory/
Known for possibly being the first to reach the peak of Mt. Everest. He died in the attempt. EIE is also possible.
Yanina Wickmayer, Ti subtype.
I'm sorry, but I'm psychologically disturbed.
White Mamba Brian Scalabrine
Brian Scalabrine - Fe valuing, but SLE is unlikely, seems more like an intuitive, and logic is uncertain
EIE is possible
>InaLim - TIM SLE
>profile picture is Hobbes the stuffed tiger
yeah... I have my doubts
Sol's brainslug boy back from the dead, this time with unsolicited avatar-typology. Surreal.
Anson Mount