Anyone else find it weird that this test consistently gives the 4 highest results as all being in the same club (NF, ST, etc)?
Anyone else find it weird that this test consistently gives the 4 highest results as all being in the same club (NF, ST, etc)?
I always get my top results as IP types. I'm pretty 'either or' when it comes to T/F and N/S, where as I and P are my strong dichotomies. Hmm actually the way the test puts ST and SF clubs and I don't find myself relating much to.
I got IEE, but I question the usefulness of the Vi section. I kept thinking, "I don't care in the slightest."
EIE-1Ni aka ENFj, The Actor, and Ethical Intuitive Extrovert
Other Possible Types
IEE (ENFp): 83% as likely as EIE
EII (INFj): 80% as likely as EIE
IEI (INFp): 72% as likely as EIE
- - - - -
I struggled with this test, although I really support the attempt to make a test and to introduce the VI element.
Ananke raised the issue that caused me the most trouble: false dichotomies. I also took exception to abstracting being opposed to concrete thinking, for the same reason, which is that intelligent people will be better at abstract thought regardless of their preferred IEs.
Some of the questions were phrased in (and, I guess, conceived in) ways that seemed removed from everyday life and lifted from typology. Transparently.
I also would be happy if I could take the VI test separately OR just see the results of it calculated apart from the written portion of the test. Curious about it, that's all.
There is one question about intro- versus extraversion that seems to draw on the "draining/recharging battery" idea, and I don't know--is that Jungian, is it Socionics, is it accurate? I've never known what to make of that notion, because I get highly energized in dealing with people and groups that I love or that matter to me, and drained by social interactions that I find unfulfilling.
Lastly, I had to begin this test three times. The first time it completely froze in the VI portion. The second time I didn't move enough sliders on page 1 to go to page 2, but when I went back to move more sliders, it never registered.
LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”
Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”
LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”
it didn't with me. but that ILE result should be more like .00000001% as likely, hah, and nowhere in my top results.
Sociotype: LSI-1Ti
aka ISTj, The Inspector, , and Logical Sensing Introvert
Other Possible Types
SLE (ESTp): 97% as likely as LSI
ILE (ENTp): 65% as likely as LSI
SLI (ISTp): 64% as likely as LSI
The test seems to conform with most people's self-typings, so that can be considered success I guess.
I think the previous time I took it (when it didn't have the photo section) I got ILI-Te, and LSE-[?] as the most likely alternative. So at least my results are (relatively) consistent. Nevertheless, I dislike some of the questions and what they're supposed to measure.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
I never really like online tests like this. =\
Haven't even tried this one. But understanding your type always *starts* with a test, before you must continue to study and learn to pick what is ultimately best for you.
And considering what others have said, about sliders, invalid dichotomies, etc., test must be fail.
And it includes VI? Ok, so it's fun, but... we all know VI is inconsistent in itself. That just makes the test more inconsistent (BUT FUN OF COURSE!)
And I wouldn't say the test is overall consistent with people's self-typings. Some truth, but a lot of people got results which aren't accurate for their type. Nowhere near consistent.
Hate to be a party-pooper, but I doubt I'm even going to bother taking this test.
Sociotype: IEI-1Ni
aka INFp, The Romantic, , and Intuitive Ethical Introvert
Other Possible Types
1. EII (INFj): 91% as likely as IEI
2. IEE (ENFp): 89% as likely as IEI
3. ILI (INTp): 70% as likely as IEI
Did the test for a second time and came out as INFp... hmm
Mine were almost all the same club.
First time taking it LII came on top followed closely by ILI, then LIE, and EII in fourth.
Second time in order of highest to lowest: ILI, LIE, LII, EII
So 3 NT types and one NF.
I wished I had copied down the percentages. I think they ranged from 95% down to approx. 70%
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
Haha, I don't think I saw half of those people when I took the test. Does it always give the same photos?
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Originally Posted by Gilly
That guy VI's as LII
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Okay, new results display both the aggregate result and the vi component result by itself. Fair warning, the vi component needs a lot of work, so don't expect too much from the results. Here's an example (my most recent result): http://www.sociotype.com/tests/index.php?est_id=676.
sociotype.com
LII
RSV3, what do the numbers before the subtype mean?
Sociotype: EII-3Fi
aka INFj, The Empath, , and Ethical Intuitive Introvert
Other Possible Types
1. ESI (ISFj): 87% as likely as EII
2. IEI (INFp): 85% as likely as EII
3. IEE (ENFp): 77% as likely as EII
EII INFj
Forum status: retired
Haha. According to VI results, ILI is my second favorite type... but Gamma is my least favorite quadra.
Oh and the other results (don't remember what I did differently this time?):
ILI-1Ni
1. LIE (ENTj): 74% as likely as ILI
2. ILE (ENTp): 72% as likely as ILI
3. LII (INTj): 70% as likely as ILI
VI Component Results (worth 30% of test)
Quadra Distribution
1. Delta: 28%
2. Alpha: 27%
3. Beta: 24%
4. Gamma: 22%
Top 4 Types
1. IEI
2. ILI
3. ILE
4. IEE
Edit: just noticed I picked four Np types by VI. Maybe there's something to it. Hm.
Here are examples of people I thought they could be compatible/incompatible with me. They are in no particular order:
I also tend to agree with most pictures of warrior-librarian's list.
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
I do wish you could skip some of the VI pics and only select the ones you felt strongly about. Some of 'em I picked just because their photo wasn't as grainy.SLI (ISTp): 73% as likely as SEI
IEI (INFp): 72% as likely as SEI
ESI (ISFj): 60% as likely as SEI
VI Component Results (worth 30% of test)
Quadra Distribution
Gamma: 31%
Delta: 26%
Beta: 23%
Alpha: 20%
Moonlight will fall
Winter will end
Harvest will come
Your heart will mend
.
Last edited by mfckr; 12-25-2014 at 01:05 AM.
ILE-0
1. LII (INTj): 81% as likely as ILE
2. SLE (ESTp): 56% as likely as ILE
3. LIE (ENTj): 55% as likely as ILE
I also had trouble with the VI. I definitely tended to pick people who seemed softer/gentler around the eyes, but there were a few times where my gut reaction was nota.
ILE
7w8 so/sp
Very busy with work. Only kind of around.
Hm, it's also difficult to compare our choices because we don't all see the same set of pictures.
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
I took it again, because I overlooked the percentages.
ILI-0 changed to ILI-1Te
LIE is still the second type
My ideal dual would be ESFp-Fi or ISFj-Se
Quadra Distribution:
Delta: 29%
Gamma: 28%
Alpha: 24%
Beta: 19%
Top 4 Types:
SLE
ILE
LSE
SEE
http://www.sociotype.com/tests/index.php?est_id=710
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
Results on the updated version:
ILI-1Ni
Other Possible Types:
1. LIE 98% as likely
2. LII 94%
3. EII 76%
VI Component Results
Delta 29%
Gamma 29%
Beta 22%
Alpha 21% (what? alphas last???)
Top 4 types:
1. ESI
2. EII
3. SEI
4. IEI
Interesting- all four introverted ethical types on the top. Maybe they just looked the friendlist and least threatening to me.
Ni: 40%
Te 35%
Si 10%
Fe 15%
Se 10%
Fi 15%
Ne 40%
Ti 35%
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
took the test again because i was curious what would come out of the VI component. i was kind of lazy about answering the first set of questions because i was in a hurry to get to the VI part. so the result probably isn't as accurate as it was before.
Sociotype: EII-0
aka INFj, The Empath, , and Ethical Intuitive Introvert
Other Possible Types
1.IEE (ENFp): 75% as likely as EII
2.LII (INTj): 62% as likely as EII
3.ESI (ISFj): 59% as likely as EII
__________________________________
VI Component Results (worth 30% of test)
Quadra Distribution
1.Alpha: 31%
2.Beta: 28%
3.Delta: 25%
4.Gamma: 16%
Top 4 Types
1.ILE
2.LII
3.SLE
4.ILI
__________________________________
well...that's interesting.
I declare the following as compatible with me, for the sake of testing
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
Seems I moved on to preferring STs this afternoon.
Sociotype: ILI-0
aka INTp, The Critic, , and Intuitive Logical Introvert
Other Possible Types
LII (INTj): 78% as likely as ILI
LIE (ENTj): 77% as likely as ILI
ILE (ENTp): 74% as likely as ILI
VI Component Results (worth 30% of test)
Quadra Distribution
Beta: 29%
Alpha: 27%
Delta: 22%
Gamma: 22%
Top 4 Types
SLE
LSE
SLI
LSI
ILI 2 Ni
87% ILE
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
new results:
Sociotype: LSI-0
aka ISTj, The Inspector, , and Logical Sensing Introvert
Other Possible Types
SLE (ESTp): 96% as likely as LSI
SLI (ISTp): 65% as likely as LSI
SEE (ESFp): 63% as likely as LSI
VI Component Results (worth 30% of test)
Quadra Distribution
Beta: 28%
Alpha: 26%
Delta: 23%
Gamma: 23%
Top 4 Types
SLE
SEE
ESI
SEI
. . . I guess I like sensors? hmm.
lol, I got more deltas too, maybe you need to add some hotter alphas
http://www.sociotype.com/tests/index.php?est_id=695
Took the test again and it told me I'm still LSE. That means I'm smart.
L=sm
S=ar
E=t.
EDIT: Oh yea, I forgot about the more conclusive result:
Sociotype: LSE-1Si
aka ESTj, The Director, , and Logical Sensing Extrovert
Other Possible Types
SLI (ISTp): 82% as likely as LSE
LIE (ENTj): 62% as likely as LSE
SLE (ESTp): 60% as likely as LSE
VI Component Results (worth 30% of test)
Quadra Distribution
Gamma: 29%
Delta: 28%
Beta: 23%
Alpha: 21%
Top 4 Types
LIE
EII
EIE
IEE
Last edited by Absurd; 02-06-2011 at 05:33 PM. Reason: DAMN
Wait, where did it give VI results? I never saw that part, maybe I should take it again.
lol what the shit
Sociotype: EII-1Fi
aka INFj, The Empath, , and Ethical Intuitive Introvert
Other Possible Types
IEE (ENFp): 96% as likely as EII
IEI (INFp): 79% as likely as EII
ESI (ISFj): 72% as likely as EII
VI Component Results (worth 30% of test)
Quadra Distribution
Gamma: 27%
Beta: 27%
Alpha: 24%
Delta: 22%
Top 4 Types
EII
LII
ESI
IEI
http://www.sociotype.com/tests/index.php?est_id=736
yes plz:
lol no: