Yes I do. I think you have a very POOR understanding of what Se is and this is probably why you neither relate with it nor can you see your base function in action like I can. You write such negative remarks towards Se type choosing to describe only actions that in your mind help you associate the characteristics to the Se base types, which again are mostly very negative. I wouldn't see LII doing thing at all.Originally Posted by warrior-librarian
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Sorry but I'm just not SEEing it. Any specific posts you've seen of mine that in your mind were particularly characteristic of SEE?
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
This one lacks Ti but has a lot of Ne...ever consider being ILE, like I VI'd you the first time? I feel like I'm supervising your posts, pointing my fingers saying "don't pattern this and that and consider individual characteristics of this type and that."
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
ILE makes a helluva alot more sense than SEE. I have alot in common with ILE, considering we share a club and quadra values but, no I'm not ILE, I don't think, even though I did consider it for a while in the past.
I relate to IJ temperament more than EP.
Considering the functions and their placements in the model A, LII is a better fit overall than ILE.
I identify with basemore than base
I identify withPoLR more than
PoLR
Pattern making in my case, I think is just creative
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote