IEI. His writing is heavily symbolic and Te PoLR. He can’t just get straight to the point by explaining anything clearly. He describes everything in metaphors, adds a mystical veil to everything. He said in an interview during the 1920s that he’s not good with reality despite liking the sensory world (Se suggestive). Apparently he self identifies as either Ti Se or Ti Ne but I don’t think that’s a reasonable assessment. Ti is heavily concerned with logical consistency and definition, which he’s really fuzzy on.