please thoroughly decide before voting, thanks.
please thoroughly decide before voting, thanks.
Divorced again ?
EDIT: I'm going to vote "the same way as before but different this time", I bet you remember the last time.
Last edited by Absurd; 12-29-2010 at 08:34 AM.
I say Ni-ILI.
I don't totally rule out EII but I think it's rather unlikely. IEI sounds not very convincing as well. I think ILI is still the best way to describe you.
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
ILE-Ti.
And I'm highly confident about it.
i wish i could fully decide ahh
i would say ILI except there have been a couple times ive gotten weird or taken things too personally and youve butted in with some non-sequitor that has taken a bit of the pressure off (unless it was just coincidental and i read too much into it, which is totally plausible). if not coincidental, it signifies higher awareness in that area than i would expect from an Fe-polr.
you seem soooo IP though, so if not Fe polr that would leave Fe creative, which you dont seem to identify with.
i could also consider LII or EII, though i don't know why. i guess the only thing that seems salient to me is: introvert, not Se ego.
and narrowing it down more, my agreement with crispy in that other thread...INxP then LII then EII.
i dont see where ILE is coming from, really.
i couldnt vote. sorry this wasnt very helpful.
You remind me of eldanen in some ways. You're way more mature than him but you have the same vibe, or at least the same aesthetic appearance. You're like a more mature eldanen.
You're kinda cute and interesting. It's kinda neat how you want to be nice to people but then again you also want to play with them and get under their skin a little. I think you'd like argumentative hate sex.
my second option would be LII-Ne for what it's worth.
ILI -> no way
ethical -> no way
Oh nawh, not again!...
ILI -> maybe no way, but ethical -> yes way. I mean I never saw him strict about things & stuff... He's rather a creative, social and artistic kind, or something. Not only that he doesn't take facts and reasoning strictness seriously, but he's often mocking them, reducing everything to the human dimension.
Shouldn't his "Logicalness" be based on something?
This could be because he's a type with leading intuitive function or the intuitive subtype of a rational type. Ne-LIIs for example aren't as straightforward than the typical T-type. I wouldn't neccessarily conclude this is connected with a F-preference, it can have multiple reasons.
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
Polly's quest - finding a type that will last and he can wear with pride.
Will someone please take him somewhere other than Walmart to get a type. The quality of the types there just don't last very long.
Poor Polly.
he's not an identical.
He writes strange things in a strange language (from my point of view)
In the beginning when he was here, most people thought of him to be an Alpha NT. I don't understand why everybody is into ILI for him nowadays, but maybe more people have to vote, if they aren't tired from polikujm type threads that is.
He's French; that explains his weirdness.
Yeah that happened with Phaedrus anf many others, the masses are extremely subjective. Nevermind this, polls and consensus lists are just a delusion. If I had a Socionics forum and was serious about it, I'd allow these only in "anything goes" (but related) sections, they're ridiculous when you think about them as evidence.
been gone 4 months and still you are figuring out your type
stick to ILI and be done with it
<Crispy> what subt doesnt understand is that a healthy reaction to "FUCK YOU" is and not
screw the denialists; polikujm is INTp.
Last edited by Exodus; 12-30-2010 at 10:43 PM.
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
I think it was in a previous chat. Or maybe I'm wrong and somebody else said it. I'm generally saving my chats, but I'm sitting in front of the wrong pc.
Sorry for not expressing myself more clearly. I think it was something like: Ti egos base their self typing on own assumptions, that's why they question their type more often. They tend to re-evaluate their own type because they always think their conclusions could be wrong as well. But I guess everyone needs assumptions for a self-typing. Or maybe I misunderstood something...
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
Hmm, I think shindaiwa on here probably said something like that, but I don't know if he still thinks that.
I think this would have to do with the nature of Ti as being based in assumptions. As Ti has no real means of judging whether or not a piece of external information has merit by itself (which would be more of a Te means of doing it), it has to sorta create a set of things that are assumed true in order for the pieces to be put together. Or so my understanding goes, someone please tell me if I'm wrong. That said, I wouldn't expect Te/Fi valuers to base their self-typings on a series of assumptions, because they'd be much more interested in the veracity of the external bits of information themselves.
There are two main requirements in understanding:
- accurate facts;
- correct interpretation of facts.
You can't dismiss either in favor of the other. Indeed the interpretation can be used on assumptions as well as on facts - maths is such an example - but that does not mean that this interpretation is a set of assumptions.
Facts and figures cannot valitate everything by themselves, in fact they reveal very little - read my sig. Deep interpretation, expansion and rules are required in order to understand a lot of things. For example, you can't tell the radius of the Sun by measurements, such thing is impossible, but you use the known correct mathematical functions to do it.
If you understand the nature of Ti and Te, you can actually realize that Socionics typing is rather a Ti field - at least someone needs to use primarily Ti to understand: unlike MBTI, where the type is determined by identifying as many typical traits and behaviors, in Socionics it is a formula so that a certain representative can behave in pretty many ways, although this formula is pretty strict and clear.
In a simplistic manner:
Te = chart: a set of actual definite inputs (Bodies), an experimental procedure, actual interactions (Dynamic), a result strictly based on them (External); "when ... action ... then ..."
Ti = function: one or more arguments/variables that can take different undefined inputs (Fields), an abstract rule, no actual interactions (Static), a result strictly based on this rule (External); "if ..., because ..., then ..."
*bump*
I thought I'd attract more attention to myself now.
.
Last edited by 717495; 09-02-2011 at 12:12 AM.
Lack of neanderthal genes. It is obvious you are INTp and you need to meet a lovely SEE.
Looking for an Archnemesis. Willing applicants contact via PM.
ENFp - Fi 7w6 sp/sx
The Ineffable IEI
The Einstein ENTp
johari nohari
http://www.mypersonality.info/ssmall/
GEE I WONDER WHO THIS PERSON IS
Looking for an Archnemesis. Willing applicants contact via PM.
ENFp - Fi 7w6 sp/sx
The Ineffable IEI
The Einstein ENTp
johari nohari
http://www.mypersonality.info/ssmall/
No, this person is not Alpha. Alpha people would not look like this. Here let me help:
Do you notice the difference?? Also he is not Si valueing as it is my valuign function adnd I would notice.
Looking for an Archnemesis. Willing applicants contact via PM.
ENFp - Fi 7w6 sp/sx
The Ineffable IEI
The Einstein ENTp
johari nohari
http://www.mypersonality.info/ssmall/
don't listen to them!`111222111!!!!
Looking for an Archnemesis. Willing applicants contact via PM.
ENFp - Fi 7w6 sp/sx
The Ineffable IEI
The Einstein ENTp
johari nohari
http://www.mypersonality.info/ssmall/