...
Same same but different
...
Last edited by Hays; 05-30-2011 at 05:20 AM.
My guess is ILI>IEI
My life's work (haha):
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin/blog.php?b=709
Input, PLEASEAnd thank you
I think she's LII.
Alot of what she's talking about sounds like+
working; "reading into thing", creating something out of nothing, being filled with ideas and theories for the purpose of putting them in order to "make sense" of things.
She describes bits ofhere and there when referring to her stationary like reflective behavior and perhaps
role with how she deals with people
EII INFj
Forum status: retired
Where is the? I don't see it, so can't vote IEI.
ILI and LII both seem closer.
LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”
Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”
LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”
Definitely ILI > LII. LII's are known for being concise, and don't normally have difficulty with it. Also the being torn between thinking/feeling is a dead giveaway to being an irrational type.
ILI (FINAL ANSWER)
Yeah, ILI
yea, shes a dynamic type, so i agree ILI>LII.Originally Posted by Crispy
(D)IEE~FI-(C)SLE~Ni E-5w4(Sp/Sx)/7w8(So/Sp)/9w1(sp/sx)
you should actually watch her instead of focussing on what she saysI think she's LII.
Alot of what she's talking about sounds like
She describes bits of
I type people like that as well. I watch how they say it rather than what they say. Quick and easier, less confusing in my opinion, but I know if you are doing to do that, it's relating to your past socionics experiences with another person with similar types or a hintch. which if you gut feeling in the past is not wrong, should be enough.
Last edited by 07490; 12-24-2010 at 05:59 PM.
(D)IEE~FI-(C)SLE~Ni E-5w4(Sp/Sx)/7w8(So/Sp)/9w1(sp/sx)
Exactly.
Te-INTp / creative over-analysis, typical expert - 2:33 "I don't care if they don't understand it"
though she physically comes off as very Ni at 2:51, when she is explaining her philosophy - how she can be inspired without an "external stimulus" (probably because she has suggestive Se)
however the rest is about how she likes to think...anyway there is no way she is IEI, and jumbled thoughts are not at all typical for Ti-leading types
she really just overanalyzed this whole video and all of her own behaviors, perhaps it is just the woes of being simultaneously IP and NT 24/7...
Last edited by Nexus; 12-25-2010 at 11:13 PM.
Both ways are valid. But the former method is a little more subjective, and to have any kind of reasonable discussion we have to use objective methods.
She talks at length about how she has a need to put things into a logical order or framework. This is basically the definition of
As for watching her, she uses very discrete hand gestures and facial expressions (logical + rational) and puts a very clear emphasis on certain words, which is something I do a lot too.
lol @ a logical base type who is torn between logic/ethics. If she was LII she would be trying to choose between an ISTX and INTX and not be so sure about being intuitive.
ILI (FINAL ANSWER)
No apparent
I wouldn't distinguish NT types by their preference forbecause they usually master both aspects.
I second other opinions about the polarization thing being a good indicator (harder to sort F vs T)
PS: I didn't really listen to the video sound, but she has same eye movements and facial expressions as my ILI ex...
"Everyone carries a shadow, and the less it is embodied in the individual’s conscious life, the blacker and denser it is.
At all counts, it forms an unconscious snag, thwarting our most well-meant intentions."
C. G. Jung
-
Are you serious? First of all, this is Myers-Briggs. Second of all, it's perfectly possible to be sure about the creative function and not the base function. This is an incredibly indirect argument for typing someone.
-_-No apparent
I wouldn't distinguish NT types by their preference for
We need a sticky thread on typing methodology or something...
LII ftw.
The speech pattern she mentions - halting between words - definitely a
Agreed, but using a person's self-perception that is phrased in terms of another system (or even socionics) is a little...indirect, to say the least.There is no single proper method I'm afraid.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote