Fi ignoring/Fe leading and adapting behavior for ENFjs and ESFjs

[Rebelondeck]

........ the openness to outside parameters can make EJs better analysts in certain situations. Ijs can sometimes have a narrow scope of understanding .......

Ejs are excellent at ferreting out information; homing in on solutions and rolling with the punches; they have many desirable processing abilities and are certainly action oriented. I doubt though that their cognitive toolboxes or patience will permit them adequate analysis of total situations although I'm sure that they could make a good stab at it when all else fails. They shine in dynamic situations that require ad hoc performances. Some Ijs can have so broad a focus that they fail to comprehend soon enough (if at all) for it to be useful so "narrow scope" doesn't really apply. Many Ijs like routine and others end up living in ruts because it helps them narrow their scope and perhaps make their worlds a little less daunting.

a.k.a. I/O

[Number 9 large]

Ejs are excellent at ferreting out information;

this is more indicable of EP temperaments since they have Ne or Se as their leading perceiving function

they have many desirable processing abilities and are certainly action oriented.

being action oriented has more to do with Se.

homing in on solutions

indicative of Ti

and rolling with the punches;

indicative of Se's flexible and on the spot thinking and acting, especially Se leads.

They shine in dynamic situations that require ad hoc performances.

EPs shine better in dynamic (and therefore unpredictable) situations because of their ''flexible/maneuvering'' qualities. Pe functions are natural improvisers, whereas Je functions are more routinely oriented.
Fe and Te attach to common known facts (te) and customs (fe). those are not necessarily vital when it comes to improvising/thinking on the spot as much as seeing the whole picture instantly (Se) or seeing new opportunities (Ne).

a.k.a. I/O

just put it in a signature bro

[Rebelondeck]

this is more indicable of EP temperaments since they have Ne or Se as their leading perceiving function
being action oriented has more to do with Se.

indicative of Ti

indicative of Se's flexible and on the spot thinking and acting, especially Se leads.

EPs shine better in dynamic (and therefore unpredictable) situations because of their ''flexible/maneuvering'' qualities. Pe functions are natural improvisers, whereas Je functions are more routinely oriented.
Fe and Te attach to common known facts (te) and customs (fe). those are not necessarily vital when it comes to improvising/thinking on the spot as much as seeing the whole picture instantly (Se) or seeing new opportunities (Ne).

just put it in a signature bro

Se and Ne-leading are nosy but not action oriented in the situation-control sense; they can be very reactionary if cornered and are dynamic in game-like activities but that's where it ends. SLEs can be knights but are too detached and reactionary to control many dynamic situations - single purpose missions like slash-and-burn, they would be good at. Homing in on something is more closed-loop functioning and Ti isn't in such a configuration, and rolling-with-the-punches doesn't refer to kamikaze activities. You cannot have seen equal-status LSEs and SLEs going at it in meetings; the latter only seems to win when occupying positions of greater power. I addressed the signature in other posts.

a.k.a. I/O

[Number 9 large]

Se leading are nosy but not action oriented in the situation-control sense

He feels the need to influence people, to control their desires and actions. - Gulenko on SLE
source: https://web.archive.org/web/20210108202041/http://www.wikisocion.net/en/index.php?title=SLE_Profile_by_Gulenko

Se leading are nosy but not action oriented in the situation-control sense

Zhukov’s message to his troops, if not exactly inspirational, had the virtue of clarity: “All commanders, political workers, and soldiers who abandon the indicated line without written order from the front or military council will be shot immediately.” By organizing a deep, echeloned defense of the city with dense minefields, he managed to stabilize the front. “In less than a month, Zhukov had mastered the gravest crisis, organized an effective defense, and repaired morale, as well as restoring discipline which had crumpled disastrously before his arrival,” Roberts quotes Erickson as saying. The American military historian David Glantz spoke of “the miracle on the Neva.”
source: https://www.hoover.org/research/zhukov-soviet-general



Google on dynamic:
dynamic

adjective

• 1.
  (of a process or system) characterized by constant change, activity, or progress.
  "a dynamic economy"
• 2.
  (of a person) positive in attitude and full of energy and new ideas.
  "a dynamic young advertising executive"

On EJ temperament: ''They are sharp and implacable, and their actions are totally predictable. They often end up being the victims of the surroundings – non-dutiful other people, unstable situations and chaotic occurrences.''
source: https://www.the16types.info/vbulleti...8-Temperaments

''Dislikes sudden, abrupt changes'' - Viktor Gulenko on LSE in his LSE description
https://web.archive.org/web/20201112...ile_by_Gulenko

You cannot have seen equal-status LSEs and SLEs going at it in meetings; the latter only seems to win when occupying positions of greater power.

maybe before you spew ur gibberish on this forum for new readers to be misled, get your facts from actual sources instead of your biased LSE-dicksucking POV.