?
?
ESE- Thomas O'Malley
EIE- Every villain fucking EVER (except Gaston).
IEI- Ariel
SLE- Gaston
EII- Belle
SLI- The Beast
LSE- The Matchmker (Mulan)
ESI- Mulan
What do these signs mean—,
, etc.? Why cannot socionists use symbols Ne, Ni etc. as in MBTI? Just because they have somewhat different meaning. Socionics and MBTI, each in its own way, have slightly modified the original Jung's description of his 8 psychological types. For this reason,
Just one example: in MBTI, Se (extraverted sensing) is associated with life pleasures, excitement etc. By contrast, the socionic function(extraverted sensing) is first and foremost associated with control and expansion of personal space (which sometimes can manifest in excessive aagression, but often also manifests in a capability of managing lots of people and things).
For this reason, we consider comparison between MBTI types and socionic types by functions to be rather useless than useful.
-Victor Gulenko, Dmitri Lytov
Sounds plausible.Originally Posted by Aleksei
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
I kind of see Cinderella as ESE.
ENTp--Belle's Father
ISFp--Peter Pan? (Although he could just as easily be ILE, I suppose.)
INTj--Rabbit(?), Cogsworth
ESFj--Baloo, Lumiere
ESTp--Gaston, Tigger(!)
INFp--Ariel(?)
ENFj--Ursula, Hades
ISTj--Claude Frollo?
General Gamma-Captain Shang has a gamma vibe to me
ESFp--Phoebus
INTp--
ENTj--
ISFj--Jasmine? (I'm pretty sure she's an Se-valuer...)
ENFp--Simba!
ISTp--
ESTj--
INFj--Belle
Not a rule, just a trend.
IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.
Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...
I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.
Simba is SEE IMO.
Oh boy, it's my chance to shine!
Disney is the most Delta thing. You cannot be Delta and dislike (the good) Disney films at the same time
Most Disney heroes have been ENFp E6s from what I can tell
Ne-ENFP: Mowgli, Robin Hood? (could be Fi, is too E7 to tell), Bianca, Quasimodo?
Fi-ENFp: Simba!, Perdi, Todd, Ariel
Fi-INFj: Belle, Serabi?
Ne-INFj: Esmeralda?
Te-ESTj: Mufasa, Bagheera, Beast
Te-ISTp: Phoebus, Pongo, Bernard, Nala
Most villians have also been Beta extroverts
ENFj: Cruella DeVille, Ursula, Maleficent, Scar, Medusa (Rescuers), Claude Frolo
ESTP: Gaston
Pooh is Delta NF
Tigger is SEE
Piglett is probably LSE lol, always chiding Pooh
Gaston, definitely EJ, not SLE...LSE probably, only they could be so proprietary about women. Belle is IEE and Beast is SLI, I guess.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
The Hunchback of Notre-Dame is probably my favorite Disney movie. It’s a complete bastardization of the Hugo novel, but they do get a lot of it right: the darkness and injustice of the times, Frollo’s sexual obsession with Esmeralda, even some of Hugo’s humor comes through. Also, I think the musical score is probably in the top 3 as far as Disney films go. I mean, look at the juxtaposition of "Heaven's Light" and "Hellfire" -- chills, I get:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_r9xNKHOekM
Here are my typings:
Quasimodo: EII
Esmeralda: ESI
Phoebus: SEE
Frollo: No clue. He doesn’t seem like an ethical type. Or really extroverted… not sure. The man was just pure unadulterated corruption. Much less nuanced and complex than in the novel.
Clopin: EIE
In the novels, though, I think Esmeralda is EII and Phoebus is a stereotypical SLE. Quasimodo in the novel is untypeable because he’s basically mentally handicapped. Frollo is… a really intense and interesting character in the novel. Not sure about his type. Similar to Javert in Les Miserables, but much more intuitive > sensory. If Javert was LSI, Claude Frollo might be LII? Or even an EII turned bad? He really sacrificed himself for his brother Jehan (probably SLE) and took in Quasimodo out of a compassion and duty to God to make up for his brother’s lasciviousness. Yeah, I’m actually liking the evil EII for Frollo, lol. (BTW, if anyone is interested in reading the novel, I highly recommend Alban Krailheimer’s translation. It’s amazing.)
"How could we forget those ancient myths that stand at the beginning of all races, the myths about dragons that at the last moment are transformed into princesses? Perhaps all the dragons in our lives are princesses who are only waiting to see us act, just once, with beauty and courage. Perhaps everything that frightens us is, in its deepest essence, something helpless that wants our love."
-- Rainer Maria Rilke, Letters to a Young Poet
Frollo is LSI imo in the movie. In the book he's EII. Imo Quasimodo in the book is SLI.
Reply With Quote
